Liang Yan, Xu Shuai, Zhao Yongfei, Liu Haiying, Mao Keya
Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
The Chinese PLA General Hospital (301 Hospital), Beijing, China.
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2021 Jun 23;12:20406223211027108. doi: 10.1177/20406223211027108. eCollection 2021.
This study aimed to explore the effects of vertebral rotation on the position of the aorta relative to the thracolumbar and lumbar spine, and to identify risk factors for vertebral rotation in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS).
A total of 71 patients with ADS were divided into left scoliosis (LS) group ( = 40 cases) and right scoliosis (RS) group ( = 31cases) with well-matched demographics. Apical vertebrae, Cobb angle (°), coronal horizontal movement, thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK) and Nash-Moe rotation classification were measured on X-ray. The Cartesian coordinate system was established on T2-MRI for each level of intervertebral disc on thracolumbar and lumbar spine, where aorta-vertebrae angle (α), aorta-vertebrae distance (d), and vertebral rotation angle (γ) for each level of T12-L1 to L3-L4 on MRI were defined within the Cartesian coordinate system.
There was no statistical difference in the distribution of apical vertebrae between LS and RS groups. Nash-Moe classification was of no significance between the two groups. When there was a larger Cobb angle and coronal horizontal movement, a greater γ in LS group and a lower γ in RS group were noted (both < 0.001). There was no correlation among γ, α, and d in LS group ( = 0.908 and 0.661, respectively) nor in RS group ( = 0.738 and 0.289, respectively). In LS group, Nash-Moe classification correlated to Cobb angle, coronal movement and TLK. In RS group, it correlated to Cobb angle and coronal movement. Cobb angle was the risk factor for Nash-Moe classification in RS group while no factors were identified in LS group. Coronal movement was independent risk factor for γ ( = 0.003) in LS group. Moreover, γ was affected by Cobb angle ( = 0.001) and coronal horizontal movement ( = 0.006) in RS group.
Vertebral rotation could be predicted by Cobb angle or coronal horizontal movement measured on X-ray in ADS patients and aorta maintained in a relatively normal position in patients with ADS.
本研究旨在探讨椎体旋转对主动脉相对于胸腰段及腰椎位置的影响,并确定成人退变性脊柱侧凸(ADS)患者椎体旋转的危险因素。
将71例ADS患者分为左脊柱侧凸(LS)组(n = 40例)和右脊柱侧凸(RS)组(n = 31例),两组人口统计学特征匹配良好。在X线片上测量顶椎、Cobb角(°)、冠状面水平移位、胸腰段后凸(TLK)及Nash-Moe旋转分级。在T2-MRI上为胸腰段及腰椎的每个椎间盘水平建立笛卡尔坐标系,在该坐标系内定义MRI上T12-L1至L3-L4各水平的主动脉-椎体角(α)、主动脉-椎体距离(d)及椎体旋转角(γ)。
LS组和RS组顶椎分布无统计学差异。两组间Nash-Moe分级无显著性差异。当Cobb角和冠状面水平移位较大时,LS组γ值较大,RS组γ值较小(均P < 0.001)。LS组γ与α、d之间无相关性(分别为P = 0.908和0.661),RS组也无相关性(分别为P = 0.738和0.289)。在LS组,Nash-Moe分级与Cobb角、冠状面移位及TLK相关。在RS组,它与Cobb角和冠状面移位相关。Cobb角是RS组Nash-Moe分级的危险因素,而LS组未发现相关因素。冠状面移位是LS组γ的独立危险因素(P = 0.003)。此外,RS组γ受Cobb角(P = 0.001)和冠状面水平移位(P = 0.006)影响。
ADS患者的椎体旋转可通过X线片测量的Cobb角或冠状面水平移位进行预测,且ADS患者的主动脉保持在相对正常的位置。