Analysis of the Resistance of the Meshes to Infection.

The mesh infection is mostly related to the gram-negative bacteria, such as Escherichia coli () for emergency surgery of incarcerated hernia. However, few study investigated the effects of concentration, mesh materials and antibiotic prophylaxis on mesh infection after hernioplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate the bacterial resistance to for three different materials of mesh, and to measure the minimum concentration for mesh infection with and without antibiotic prophylaxis in a rat model. Three types of mesh (polytetrafluoroethylene, polypropylene, and biologic meshes) were used in the repair of an acute ventral hernia rat model in the setting of different concentrations of loads and antibiotics. At the 8th day after surgery, mesh samples were sent for microbiologic and histologic analyses. The positive rates of bacterial culture increased with concentration. The biologic mesh showed better bacterial resistance compared to polytetrafluoroethylene mesh and polypropylene mesh when the concentration of ranges from 10 CFU/ml to 10 CFU/ml ( = 0.002 and = 0.029, respectively). Prophylactical ceftriaxone treatment could not decrease the colonization rate of at 10 CFU/ml or 10 CFU/ml in each group ( > 0.05). The scores of neovascularization in polypropylene mesh and biologic mesh were similar, which was higher than that of polytetrafluoroethylene mesh ( < 0.05). Compared with other meshes, biologic mesh showed better tolerance to 10 CFU/ml with respect to inflammation, depth of inflammation, neovascularization, cellular repopulation and foreign body giant cells. The biologic mesh had better resistance compared to polytetrafluoroethylene mesh and polypropylene mesh when the concentration is higher than 10 CFU/ml in rats. Antibiotic prophylaxis was useful when the contamination was not particularly severe.