Suppr超能文献

概念化社区心理健康背景下的参与:以会所模式为起点。

Conceptualizing participation in the community mental health context: Beginning with the Clubhouse model.

机构信息

Department of Social Welfare, Tokyo Fukushi University, Tokyo Japan.

Center for Social Work Education, Widener University, Chester, PA, U.S.A.

出版信息

Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1950890. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1950890.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Although participation is key to community mental health, the concept remains elusive. The study explored a conceptualization of participation in the community-based mental health agencies context from a first-person perspective, using the Clubhouse model as an example.

METHODS

Qualitative data, collected from 21 Clubhouse service users through three focus groups (1 UK and 2 US) for primary analysis and secondary data from 104 individual interviews, were analysed using a grounded theory approach.

RESULTS

Focus group narratives revealed three main domains of what may be named everyday participation process, Making Decisions, Doing Work, and Locating Oneself in Community, blended with each other rather than forming clear-cut stages. Sixty-six extracted primary codes, with two underlying interrelated core categories identified, named Autonomy and Egalitarian Connection, were organized by domain and by category.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings suggest a 3 × 2 axial model of participation that participation signifies a behaviour, comprised of three blended activity domains, entailing actions and interactions that concern Autonomy and Egalitarian Connection, which, dynamically interacting with each other, appear to condition meaningful participation the next day. Egalitarian relationship skills development appears critical for training practitioners to help promote service users' quality everyday participation and getting-a-life-back experiences towards well-being, or meaningful life.

摘要

目的

尽管参与是社区心理健康的关键,但这一概念仍然难以捉摸。本研究从第一人称的角度探讨了社区心理健康机构背景下的参与概念,以会所模式为例。

方法

通过三个焦点小组(1 个在英国,2 个在美国)对 21 名会所服务使用者的定性数据进行了主要分析,并对 104 名个人访谈的次要数据进行了分析,使用扎根理论方法进行了分析。

结果

焦点小组的叙述揭示了日常参与过程的三个主要领域,即决策、工作和在社区中的定位,这些领域相互融合,而不是形成明确的阶段。从 66 个提取的主要代码中,确定了两个相互关联的核心类别,分别命名为自主性和平等连接,根据领域和类别进行了组织。

结论

研究结果表明,参与是一种行为,由三个混合的活动领域组成,包含涉及自主性和平等连接的行动和互动,它们相互动态地相互作用,似乎是第二天有意义参与的条件。平等关系技能的发展对于培训从业者来说至关重要,有助于促进服务使用者的日常参与和恢复生活的体验,以实现幸福或有意义的生活。

相似文献

2
Staff views on member participation in a mental health clubhouse.员工对会员参与心理健康会所的看法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 May;27(3):788-796. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12697. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
6
Recovery at the Clubhouse: challenge, responsibility and growing into a role.会所康复:挑战、责任与角色成长。
Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2021 Dec;16(1):1938957. doi: 10.1080/17482631.2021.1938957.
7
Autonomy Support and Recovery Practice at a Psychosocial Clubhouse.心理社会俱乐部会所中的自主支持与康复实践
Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2017 Jul;53(3):175-182. doi: 10.1111/ppc.12149. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
10
Peer support within Clubhouse: a grounded theory study.俱乐部内部的同伴支持:扎根理论研究。
Community Ment Health J. 2012 Apr;48(2):153-60. doi: 10.1007/s10597-010-9358-5. Epub 2010 Oct 24.

本文引用的文献

2
Why We Come: Clubhouse Members Seek Connection, Purpose and Meaning.我们为何而来:俱乐部会员寻求联系、目标和意义。
Community Ment Health J. 2021 Apr;57(3):446-456. doi: 10.1007/s10597-020-00685-6. Epub 2020 Jul 15.
3
Staff views on member participation in a mental health clubhouse.员工对会员参与心理健康会所的看法。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 May;27(3):788-796. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12697. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
5
Mental rehabilitation in China: the clubhouse model.
Lancet Psychiatry. 2018 May;5(5):386-387. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(18)30047-6.
7
Sense of clubhouse community belonging and empowerment.会所社区归属感和赋权感。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2018 May;64(3):276-285. doi: 10.1177/0020764018759134. Epub 2018 Feb 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验