• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在意大利急诊部进行的一项吸烟咨询的有效性和可行性:随机对照试验。

Effectiveness and feasibility of smoking counselling: a randomized controlled trial in an Italian emergency department.

机构信息

Department of Translational Medicine, Università degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale, Novara, Italy.

Emergency Department, "Maggiore della Carità" University Hospital, Novara, Italy.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2022 Feb 1;32(1):119-125. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab114.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckab114
PMID:34252178
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8807080/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

5A's counselling is recommended for screening and treating patients with smoking addiction. The emergency department (ED) setting might be a suitable environment for conducting interventions for smoking cessation. The present study aims to determine the feasibility and effectiveness on smoking cessation of 5A's counselling administered to ED patients by nurses.

METHODS

Parallel group randomized trial assessing 5A's counselling for smoking cessation vs. usual care at a University Hospital in the North of Italy. The primary end-point was prevalence of tobacco-free patients. The secondary outcomes at 6- and 12-month follow-up were (i) consecutive past 30-day smoking abstinence; (ii) past 7-day 50%, or more, decrease in daily tobacco consumption over baseline; and (iii) number of attempts to quit smoking.

RESULTS

A total of 480 patients were randomized to intervention (n = 262) or usual care (n = 218). Intention to treat analysis displayed no differences in primary and secondary outcomes between groups. A slight but not statistically significant enhancement in cessation was recorded in the intervention group [relative risk (RR) = 1.04, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.58-1.87] at 6 months, whereas a reversed observation at 12 months (RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.50-1.47). Similar results were obtained for the secondary outcomes. Per protocol analysis increased the size of the results. Of the 126 smokers receiving counselling, 18 were visited and treated at the local smoking cessation centre, with 12 of them successfully completing the treatment.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicate that the ED is not a suited environment for 5A's counselling.

摘要

背景

5A 咨询被推荐用于筛查和治疗吸烟成瘾患者。急诊科(ED)环境可能是实施戒烟干预的合适环境。本研究旨在确定由护士在 ED 患者中进行的 5A 咨询对戒烟的可行性和效果。

方法

一项在意大利北部一所大学医院进行的 5A 咨询戒烟与常规护理的平行组随机试验。主要终点是无烟草患者的比例。次要结局在 6 个月和 12 个月随访时分别为:(i)连续 30 天吸烟戒断;(ii)与基线相比,过去 7 天每日烟草消耗减少 50%或更多;和(iii)戒烟尝试次数。

结果

共有 480 名患者被随机分配至干预组(n=262)或常规护理组(n=218)。意向治疗分析显示两组在主要和次要结局上无差异。干预组的戒烟率略有但无统计学意义的提高[相对风险(RR)=1.04,95%置信区间(CI)=0.58-1.87]在 6 个月时,而在 12 个月时则出现相反的观察结果(RR=0.86,95%CI=0.50-1.47)。次要结局也得到了类似的结果。方案分析增加了结果的规模。在接受咨询的 126 名吸烟者中,有 18 人接受了当地戒烟中心的访视和治疗,其中 12 人成功完成了治疗。

结论

本研究结果表明,ED 不是 5A 咨询的合适环境。

相似文献

1
Effectiveness and feasibility of smoking counselling: a randomized controlled trial in an Italian emergency department.在意大利急诊部进行的一项吸烟咨询的有效性和可行性:随机对照试验。
Eur J Public Health. 2022 Feb 1;32(1):119-125. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab114.
2
The emergency department action in smoking cessation (EDASC) trial: impact on cessation outcomes.急诊科戒烟行动(EDASC)试验:对戒烟结果的影响。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2013 Jun;15(6):1032-43. doi: 10.1093/ntr/nts219. Epub 2012 Nov 2.
3
Randomized controlled trial of emergency department initiated smoking cessation counselling and referral to a community counselling service.随机对照试验:急诊科启动的戒烟咨询和向社区咨询服务转介。
CJEM. 2018 Jul;20(4):556-564. doi: 10.1017/cem.2017.345. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
4
A smoking cessation intervention plus proactive quitline referral in the pediatric emergency department: a pilot study.儿科急诊科的戒烟干预加主动戒烟热线转诊:一项试点研究。
Nicotine Tob Res. 2008 Dec;10(12):1745-51. doi: 10.1080/14622200802443494.
5
Computer-Facilitated 5A's for Smoking Cessation: A Randomized Trial of Technology to Promote Provider Adherence.计算机辅助 5A's 戒烟法:促进提供者遵嘱的技术随机试验。
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Jul;55(1):35-43. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.04.009. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
6
The 5A's vs 3A's plus proactive quitline referral in private practice dental offices: preliminary results.私人执业牙科诊所中 5A 法与 3A 法加主动戒烟热线转诊的比较:初步结果
Tob Control. 2007 Aug;16(4):285-8. doi: 10.1136/tc.2007.020271.
7
Combined pharmacotherapy and behavioural interventions for smoking cessation.联合药物治疗与行为干预以戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD008286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008286.pub2.
8
Medical student INtervention to promote effective nicotine dependence and tobacco HEalthcare (MIND-THE-GAP): single-centre feasibility randomised trial results.医学专业学生促进有效尼古丁依赖和烟草保健干预(MIND-THE-GAP):单中心可行性随机试验结果。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Dec 11;17(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-1069-y.
9
Oncology healthcare providers' implementation of the 5A's model of brief intervention for smoking cessation: patients' perceptions.肿瘤医疗保健提供者实施简短干预戒烟 5A 模式的情况:患者的看法。
Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Mar;86(3):414-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2011.06.016. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
10
Are Chinese pediatricians missing the opportunity to help parents quit smoking?中国儿科医生是否错失了帮助家长戒烟的机会?
BMC Pediatr. 2016 Aug 20;16:135. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0672-0.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of nurses in smoking cessation interventions for patients: a scoping review.护士在患者戒烟干预中的作用:一项范围综述
BMC Nurs. 2024 Nov 5;23(1):803. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02470-2.
2
Standardised Practice-Based Oral Health Data Collection: A Pilot Study in Different Countries.标准化基于实践的口腔健康数据收集:不同国家的试点研究。
Int Dent J. 2023 Aug;73(4):566-573. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2023.02.002. Epub 2023 Mar 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Smoking cessation intervention for patients with head and neck cancer: A prospective randomized controlled trial.头颈部癌症患者的戒烟干预:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
Am J Otolaryngol. 2021 Jan-Feb;42(1):102832. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2020.102832. Epub 2020 Nov 14.
2
Nursing interventions for smoking cessation.戒烟的护理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 15;12(12):CD001188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001188.pub5.
3
Quit attempts and smoking cessation in Italian adults (25-64 years): factors associated with attempts and successes.
意大利成年人(25-64 岁)的戒烟尝试和戒烟情况:与尝试和成功相关的因素。
Eur J Public Health. 2017 Aug 1;27(4):717-722. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckw262.
4
Smoking cessation results in a clinical lung cancer screening program.戒烟会促成一项临床肺癌筛查计划。
J Thorac Dis. 2016 Jul;8(Suppl 6):S481-7. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2016.03.11.
5
Psychological distress in medical patients 30 days following an emergency department admission: results from a prospective, observational study.急诊科入院后30天内科患者的心理困扰:一项前瞻性观察性研究的结果。
BMC Emerg Med. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12873-016-0097-y.
6
Health evaluation and referral assistant: a randomized controlled trial to improve smoking cessation among emergency department patients.健康评估与转诊助手:一项改善急诊科患者戒烟情况的随机对照试验。
Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2015 Nov 5;10:24. doi: 10.1186/s13722-015-0045-2.
7
Primary Care Provider-Delivered Smoking Cessation Interventions and Smoking Cessation Among Participants in the National Lung Screening Trial.初级保健提供者实施的戒烟干预措施与国家肺癌筛查试验参与者的戒烟情况
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Sep;175(9):1509-16. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2391.
8
Evaluation of a brief counseling for tobacco cessation in dental clinics among Swedish smokers and snus users. A cluster randomized controlled trial (the FRITT study).瑞典吸烟者和鼻烟使用者牙科诊所简短戒烟咨询的评估。一项整群随机对照试验(FRITT研究)。
Prev Med. 2015 Jan;70:26-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Nov 18.
9
A systematic review of smoking cessation interventions in the emergency setting.在急诊环境中戒烟干预措施的系统评价。
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Jul;32(7):713-24. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.03.042. Epub 2014 Apr 2.
10
Interventions for preoperative smoking cessation.术前戒烟干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Mar 27;2014(3):CD002294. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002294.pub4.