• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 COVID-19 大流行之前的世界中,疫苗接种拯救了 112 个国家的 10 种病原体感染的 10 亿人生命。

Lives saved with vaccination for 10 pathogens across 112 countries in a pre-COVID-19 world.

机构信息

MRC Centre for Global Infectious Disease Analysis; and the Abdul Latif Jameel Institute for Disease and Emergency Analytics (J-IDEA), School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Elife. 2021 Jul 13;10:e67635. doi: 10.7554/eLife.67635.

DOI:10.7554/eLife.67635
PMID:34253291
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8277373/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vaccination is one of the most effective public health interventions. We investigate the impact of vaccination activities for type b, hepatitis B, human papillomavirus, Japanese encephalitis, measles, serogroup A, rotavirus, rubella, , and yellow fever over the years 2000-2030 across 112 countries.

METHODS

Twenty-one mathematical models estimated disease burden using standardised demographic and immunisation data. Impact was attributed to the year of vaccination through vaccine-activity-stratified impact ratios.

RESULTS

We estimate 97 (95%CrI[80, 120]) million deaths would be averted due to vaccination activities over 2000-2030, with 50 (95%CrI[41, 62]) million deaths averted by activities between 2000 and 2019. For children under-5 born between 2000 and 2030, we estimate 52 (95%CrI[41, 69]) million more deaths would occur over their lifetimes without vaccination against these diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the largest assessment of vaccine impact before COVID-19-related disruptions and provides motivation for sustaining and improving global vaccination coverage in the future.

FUNDING

VIMC is jointly funded by Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) (BMGF grant number: OPP1157270 / INV-009125). Funding from Gavi is channelled via VIMC to the Consortium's modelling groups (VIMC-funded institutions represented in this paper: Imperial College London, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Oxford University Clinical Research Unit, Public Health England, Johns Hopkins University, The Pennsylvania State University, Center for Disease Analysis Foundation, Kaiser Permanente Washington, University of Cambridge, University of Notre Dame, Harvard University, Conservatoire National des Arts et Métiers, Emory University, National University of Singapore). Funding from BMGF was used for salaries of the Consortium secretariat (authors represented here: TBH, MJ, XL, SE-L, JT, KW, NMF, KAMG); and channelled via VIMC for travel and subsistence costs of all Consortium members (all authors). We also acknowledge funding from the UK Medical Research Council and Department for International Development, which supported aspects of VIMC's work (MRC grant number: MR/R015600/1).JHH acknowledges funding from National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship; Richard and Peggy Notebaert Premier Fellowship from the University of Notre Dame. BAL acknowledges funding from NIH/NIGMS (grant number R01 GM124280) and NIH/NIAID (grant number R01 AI112970). The Lives Saved Tool (LiST) receives funding support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.This paper was compiled by all coauthors, including two coauthors from Gavi. Other funders had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or writing of the report. All authors had full access to all the data in the study and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

摘要

背景

疫苗接种是最有效的公共卫生干预措施之一。我们研究了 2000 年至 2030 年期间在 112 个国家开展的乙型肝炎、乙型肝炎、人乳头瘤病毒、日本脑炎、麻疹、A 群、轮状病毒、风疹、黄热病疫苗接种活动对疾病负担的影响。

方法

21 个数学模型使用标准化的人口统计学和免疫接种数据来估计疾病负担。通过疫苗活动分层影响比,将影响归因于接种疫苗的年份。

结果

我们估计,在 2000 年至 2030 年期间,疫苗接种活动将避免 9700 万人(95%置信区间[8000 万,1.20 亿])死亡,其中 5000 万人(95%置信区间[4100 万,6200 万])死亡将在 2000 年至 2019 年期间避免。对于 2000 年至 2030 年期间出生的 5 岁以下儿童,如果不接种这些疾病的疫苗,我们估计他们一生中会多死亡 5200 万人(95%置信区间[4100 万,6900 万])。

结论

本研究代表了在 COVID-19 相关干扰之前对疫苗影响的最大评估,并为未来维持和改善全球疫苗接种覆盖率提供了动力。

资助

VIMC 由全球疫苗免疫联盟(Gavi)、疫苗联盟和比尔和梅琳达盖茨基金会(BMGF)共同资助(BMGF 赠款编号:OPP1157270/INV-009125)。Gavi 的资金通过 VIMC 流向联盟的建模小组(本文代表的 VIMC 资助机构:伦敦帝国理工学院、伦敦卫生与热带医学院、牛津大学临床研究单位、英国公共卫生部、约翰霍普金斯大学、宾夕法尼亚州立大学、疾病分析基金会、凯撒永久华盛顿、剑桥大学、圣母大学、哈佛大学、国立艺术与工艺学院、埃默里大学、新加坡国立大学)。BMGF 的资金用于支付联盟秘书处的工资(本文代表的作者:TBH、MJ、XL、SE-L、JT、KW、NMF、KAMG);并通过 VIMC 为所有联盟成员的差旅和生活费提供资金(所有作者)。我们还感谢英国医学研究理事会和国际发展部的资助,这些资助支持了 VIMC 工作的各个方面(MRC 赠款编号:MR/R015600/1)。JHH 感谢美国国立卫生研究院国家科学基金会研究生研究奖学金的支持;理查德和佩吉·诺特巴哈特名誉奖学金来自圣母大学。BAL 感谢美国国立卫生研究院国家过敏和传染病研究所(R01 GM124280)和美国国立卫生研究院国家老龄化研究所(R01 AI112970)的资助。挽救生命工具(LiST)得到了比尔和梅琳达盖茨基金会的资助。本文由所有合著者编写,其中包括两位来自 Gavi 的合著者。其他资助者在研究设计、数据收集、数据分析、数据解释或报告提交方面没有任何作用。所有作者都可以完全访问研究中的所有数据,并对提交报告的最终决定负责。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/5925c9069476/elife-67635-app5-fig22.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/1554c2ceb0d8/elife-67635-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/7436e4bfc01e/elife-67635-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/cdbf239f3769/elife-67635-app5-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/c811e4aa4e10/elife-67635-app5-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/45dace31695f/elife-67635-app5-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/63a218e29472/elife-67635-app5-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/365a0926a33b/elife-67635-app5-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/e438c0a75205/elife-67635-app5-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/6235a82b7978/elife-67635-app5-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/713536bd6e84/elife-67635-app5-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/ee95f06ef8fd/elife-67635-app5-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/140409903b1d/elife-67635-app5-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/403a7a707e41/elife-67635-app5-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/2601da4ee557/elife-67635-app5-fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/a7df75d417f2/elife-67635-app5-fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/29056ab452f7/elife-67635-app5-fig14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/a97bf213fcbd/elife-67635-app5-fig15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/217c0f8b597a/elife-67635-app5-fig16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/ba4f819ac4a5/elife-67635-app5-fig17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/5912d051626b/elife-67635-app5-fig18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/a8f9829c8c01/elife-67635-app5-fig19.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/7dc8c5161380/elife-67635-app5-fig20.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/3f877f4187fd/elife-67635-app5-fig21.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/5925c9069476/elife-67635-app5-fig22.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/1554c2ceb0d8/elife-67635-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/7436e4bfc01e/elife-67635-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/cdbf239f3769/elife-67635-app5-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/c811e4aa4e10/elife-67635-app5-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/45dace31695f/elife-67635-app5-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/63a218e29472/elife-67635-app5-fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/365a0926a33b/elife-67635-app5-fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/e438c0a75205/elife-67635-app5-fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/6235a82b7978/elife-67635-app5-fig7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/713536bd6e84/elife-67635-app5-fig8.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/ee95f06ef8fd/elife-67635-app5-fig9.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/140409903b1d/elife-67635-app5-fig10.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/403a7a707e41/elife-67635-app5-fig11.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/2601da4ee557/elife-67635-app5-fig12.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/a7df75d417f2/elife-67635-app5-fig13.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/29056ab452f7/elife-67635-app5-fig14.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/a97bf213fcbd/elife-67635-app5-fig15.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/217c0f8b597a/elife-67635-app5-fig16.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/ba4f819ac4a5/elife-67635-app5-fig17.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/5912d051626b/elife-67635-app5-fig18.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/a8f9829c8c01/elife-67635-app5-fig19.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/7dc8c5161380/elife-67635-app5-fig20.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/3f877f4187fd/elife-67635-app5-fig21.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bf5e/8277373/5925c9069476/elife-67635-app5-fig22.jpg

相似文献

1
Lives saved with vaccination for 10 pathogens across 112 countries in a pre-COVID-19 world.在 COVID-19 大流行之前的世界中,疫苗接种拯救了 112 个国家的 10 种病原体感染的 10 亿人生命。
Elife. 2021 Jul 13;10:e67635. doi: 10.7554/eLife.67635.
2
Estimating the health effects of COVID-19-related immunisation disruptions in 112 countries during 2020-30: a modelling study.估算 2020-2030 年期间 112 个国家因与 COVID-19 相关的免疫接种中断对健康产生的影响:建模研究。
Lancet Glob Health. 2024 Apr;12(4):e563-e571. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(23)00603-4.
3
Estimating the health impact of vaccination against ten pathogens in 98 low-income and middle-income countries from 2000 to 2030: a modelling study.估算 2000 至 2030 年期间在 98 个低收入和中等收入国家针对十种病原体接种疫苗对健康的影响:建模研究。
Lancet. 2021 Jan 30;397(10272):398-408. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32657-X.
4
The estimated mortality impact of vaccinations forecast to be administered during 2011-2020 in 73 countries supported by the GAVI Alliance.全球疫苗免疫联盟支持的 73 个国家预计在 2011 年至 2020 年期间进行接种的疫苗对死亡率的影响估计。
Vaccine. 2013 Apr 18;31 Suppl 2:B61-72. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.11.035.
5
Modeling the impact of vaccination for the immunization Agenda 2030: Deaths averted due to vaccination against 14 pathogens in 194 countries from 2021 to 2030.建模疫苗接种对免疫议程 2030 的影响:2021 年至 2030 年,194 个国家针对 14 种病原体的疫苗接种可避免的死亡人数。
Vaccine. 2024 Apr 8;42 Suppl 1:S28-S37. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.07.033. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
6
Global impact of the first year of COVID-19 vaccination: a mathematical modelling study.全球首例 COVID-19 疫苗接种一年的影响:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Sep;22(9):1293-1302. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00320-6. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
7
Routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: a benefit-risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.非洲 COVID-19 大流行期间的常规儿童免疫接种:权衡 SARS-CoV-2 感染的超额风险与健康获益的利弊分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1264-e1272. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30308-9. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
8
An international observational study to assess the impact of the Omicron variant emergence on the clinical epidemiology of COVID-19 in hospitalised patients.一项旨在评估奥密克戎变异株出现对住院 COVID-19 患者临床流行病学影响的国际观察性研究。
Elife. 2022 Oct 5;11:e80556. doi: 10.7554/eLife.80556.
9
Antibody levels following vaccination against SARS-CoV-2: associations with post-vaccination infection and risk factors in two UK longitudinal studies.接种 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗后的抗体水平:两项英国纵向研究中与接种后感染和危险因素的关系。
Elife. 2023 Jan 24;12:e80428. doi: 10.7554/eLife.80428.
10
Impact of COVID-19-related disruptions to measles, meningococcal A, and yellow fever vaccination in 10 countries.10 国因新冠疫情相关干扰对麻疹、脑膜炎球菌 A 型和黄热病疫苗接种的影响。
Elife. 2021 Jun 24;10:e67023. doi: 10.7554/eLife.67023.

引用本文的文献

1
Inequalities in diarrhoea, pneumonia and measles deaths: estimates for 21 sub-Saharan African countries.腹泻、肺炎和麻疹死亡方面的不平等:21个撒哈拉以南非洲国家的估计数
Bull World Health Organ. 2025 Sep 1;103(9):522-529. doi: 10.2471/BLT.24.292198. Epub 2025 Aug 21.
2
Strength and weakness of disease-induced herd immunity in networks.疾病诱导的网络群体免疫的优势与劣势
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 15;122(28):e2421460122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2421460122. Epub 2025 Jul 10.
3
Estimating the historical impact of outbreak response immunisation programmes across 210 outbreaks in low and middle-income countries.

本文引用的文献

1
How can the public health impact of vaccination be estimated?如何评估疫苗接种对公共卫生的影响?
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 9;21(1):2049. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12040-9.
2
Impact of COVID-19-related disruptions to measles, meningococcal A, and yellow fever vaccination in 10 countries.10 国因新冠疫情相关干扰对麻疹、脑膜炎球菌 A 型和黄热病疫苗接种的影响。
Elife. 2021 Jun 24;10:e67023. doi: 10.7554/eLife.67023.
3
The global burden of yellow fever.全球黄热病负担。
评估低收入和中等收入国家210次疫情应对免疫规划的历史影响。
BMJ Glob Health. 2025 Jul 9;10(7):e016887. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016887.
4
Mycophenolic acid treatment drives the emergence of novel SARS-CoV-2 variants.霉酚酸治疗促使新型严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)变体出现。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025 Jul 15;122(28):e2500276122. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2500276122. Epub 2025 Jul 9.
5
COVID-19 vaccine uptake and predictors of hesitancy among healthcare workers in Côte d'Ivoire.科特迪瓦医疗工作者对新冠疫苗的接种情况及犹豫因素分析
J Public Health Afr. 2025 Apr 24;16(1):678. doi: 10.4102/jphia.v16i1.678. eCollection 2025.
6
Prophylactic vaccination strategies for adult patients with diabetes: a narrative review of safety profiles and clinical effectiveness.成年糖尿病患者的预防性疫苗接种策略:安全性和临床有效性的叙述性综述
Clin Exp Vaccine Res. 2025 Apr;14(2):101-115. doi: 10.7774/cevr.2025.14.e11. Epub 2025 Mar 18.
7
Vaccine failure mode determines population-level impact of vaccination campaigns during epidemics.疫苗失效模式决定了疫情期间疫苗接种运动对人群层面的影响。
J R Soc Interface. 2025 Feb;22(223):20240689. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2024.0689. Epub 2025 Feb 19.
8
Uptake and determinants of HPV vaccination in South Asia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.南亚地区人乳头瘤病毒疫苗接种情况及影响因素:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Public Health. 2024 Dec 11;12:1453704. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1453704. eCollection 2024.
9
Vaccines for cancer prevention: exploring opportunities and navigating challenges.用于癌症预防的疫苗:探索机遇与应对挑战
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2025 Feb;24(2):134-150. doi: 10.1038/s41573-024-01081-5. Epub 2024 Dec 2.
10
Direct and indirect effects of hepatitis B vaccination in four low- and middle-income countries.四个低收入和中等收入国家乙肝疫苗接种的直接和间接影响
Epidemics. 2024 Dec;49:100798. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2024.100798. Epub 2024 Nov 6.
Elife. 2021 Mar 16;10:e64670. doi: 10.7554/eLife.64670.
4
Impact of Nonpharmaceutical Interventions for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 on Norovirus Outbreaks: An Analysis of Outbreaks Reported By 9 US States.非药物干预措施对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2 型的影响:对 9 个美国州报告的暴发事件的分析。
J Infect Dis. 2021 Jul 2;224(1):9-13. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiab093.
5
Estimating the health impact of vaccination against ten pathogens in 98 low-income and middle-income countries from 2000 to 2030: a modelling study.估算 2000 至 2030 年期间在 98 个低收入和中等收入国家针对十种病原体接种疫苗对健康的影响:建模研究。
Lancet. 2021 Jan 30;397(10272):398-408. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32657-X.
6
How COVID-19 is changing the cold and flu season.新冠病毒如何改变感冒和流感季节。
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7838):388-390. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-03519-3.
7
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic response on uptake of routine immunizations in Sindh, Pakistan: An analysis of provincial electronic immunization registry data.新冠疫情应对措施对巴基斯坦信德省常规免疫接种率的影响:对省级电子免疫登记数据的分析。
Vaccine. 2020 Oct 21;38(45):7146-7155. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.08.019. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
8
Impact of COVID-19 pandemic and the lockdown on invasive meningococcal disease.2019冠状病毒病大流行及封锁措施对侵袭性脑膜炎球菌病的影响
BMC Res Notes. 2020 Aug 27;13(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-05241-9.
9
Modelling hepatitis B virus infection and impact of timely birth dose vaccine: A comparison of two simulation models.乙型肝炎病毒感染建模及及时出生剂量疫苗的影响:两种模拟模型的比较。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 10;15(8):e0237525. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237525. eCollection 2020.
10
Routine childhood immunisation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa: a benefit-risk analysis of health benefits versus excess risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection.非洲 COVID-19 大流行期间的常规儿童免疫接种:权衡 SARS-CoV-2 感染的超额风险与健康获益的利弊分析。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Oct;8(10):e1264-e1272. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30308-9. Epub 2020 Jul 17.