• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国不同残疾状况成年人糖尿病筛查水平的横断面比较。

A Cross-Sectional Comparison of US Adult Diabetes Screening Levels by Disability Status.

机构信息

Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale University, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.

Department of Biostatistics, Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

出版信息

J Prim Prev. 2021 Oct;42(5):459-471. doi: 10.1007/s10935-021-00641-4. Epub 2021 Jul 12.

DOI:10.1007/s10935-021-00641-4
PMID:34254255
Abstract

Diabetes is a potentially life-threatening metabolic condition that disproportionately affects US adults with a disability. Diabetes screening is key to early disease detection and prompt treatment, but it is not known whether US adults with a disability receive similar levels of diabetes screening as individuals without a disability. We compared diabetes screening levels in US adults with a disability to those without one. Using national 2017 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys, we determined the prevalence of diabetes screening by disability status in US adults who fall under the American Diabetes Association's recommended screening guidelines: those younger than 45 years old with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m and those aged 45 years and older. We used logistic regression modelling to examine the impact of disability status on diabetes screening while adjusting for diabetes associated sociodemographic and clinical factors. In people with a disability, around 50% of those younger than 45 years old with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m and 33% of those 45 years or older did not receive screening. In the under 45 years with a BMI ≥ 25 kg/m screening group, individuals with a disability had a slightly higher but non-significant prevalence, but a lower adjusted odds of diabetes screening compared to those without a disability. People with a disability under age 45 had a slightly lower but again non-significant prevalence but a higher adjusted odds of diabetes screening than did those without a disability who were age 45 or older. Additional interventions are needed to improve diabetes screening levels among US adults with a disability at high risk of developing diabetes as screening is a critical initial step in the diabetes management process.

摘要

糖尿病是一种潜在的危及生命的代谢疾病,在美国残疾成年人中发病率不成比例。糖尿病筛查是早期发现疾病和及时治疗的关键,但目前尚不清楚美国残疾成年人是否接受与非残疾成年人相同水平的糖尿病筛查。我们比较了美国残疾成年人和非残疾成年人的糖尿病筛查水平。我们使用 2017 年全国行为风险因素监测系统调查,根据美国糖尿病协会推荐的筛查指南,确定了符合筛查条件的美国残疾成年人中糖尿病筛查的患病率:年龄在 45 岁以下、身体质量指数(BMI)≥25kg/m2的人群和年龄在 45 岁及以上的人群。我们使用逻辑回归模型,在调整了与糖尿病相关的社会人口学和临床因素后,研究了残疾状况对糖尿病筛查的影响。在残疾人群中,大约有 50%年龄在 45 岁以下、BMI≥25kg/m2的人群和 33%年龄在 45 岁及以上的人群没有接受筛查。在 BMI≥25kg/m2且年龄在 45 岁以下的筛查人群中,残疾个体的糖尿病筛查患病率略高,但无统计学意义,但与无残疾者相比,残疾者的糖尿病筛查调整后比值比较低。年龄在 45 岁以下的残疾人群糖尿病筛查的患病率略低,但同样无统计学意义,但与年龄在 45 岁及以上且无残疾的人群相比,残疾者的糖尿病筛查调整后比值比更高。需要采取额外的干预措施来提高美国高风险残疾成年人的糖尿病筛查水平,因为筛查是糖尿病管理过程中的一个关键初始步骤。

相似文献

1
A Cross-Sectional Comparison of US Adult Diabetes Screening Levels by Disability Status.美国不同残疾状况成年人糖尿病筛查水平的横断面比较。
J Prim Prev. 2021 Oct;42(5):459-471. doi: 10.1007/s10935-021-00641-4. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
2
Impact of Lowering BMI Cut Points as Recommended in the Revised American Diabetes Association's Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2015 on Diabetes Screening in Asian Americans.按照2015年修订的美国糖尿病协会糖尿病医疗护理标准中建议降低体重指数切点对亚裔美国人糖尿病筛查的影响。
Diabetes Care. 2015 Nov;38(11):2166-8. doi: 10.2337/dc15-0299. Epub 2015 Aug 31.
3
Prevalence of self-reported diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors in a national survey in the US population: SHIELD (Study to Help Improve Early evaluation and management of risk factors Leading to Diabetes).美国人群全国性调查中自我报告的糖尿病诊断患病率及相关危险因素:SHIELD(帮助改善导致糖尿病的危险因素的早期评估和管理研究)
BMC Public Health. 2007 Oct 3;7:277. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-7-277.
4
Inverse association between diabetes and altitude: a cross-sectional study in the adult population of the United States.糖尿病与海拔之间的负相关关系:一项针对美国成年人群的横断面研究。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2014 Sep;22(9):2080-90. doi: 10.1002/oby.20800. Epub 2014 May 28.
5
A cross-sectional analysis of racial disparities in US diabetes screening at the national, regional, and state level.美国国家、地区和州层面糖尿病筛查的种族差异横断面分析。
J Diabetes Complications. 2020 Jan;34(1):107478. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2019.107478. Epub 2019 Nov 5.
6
Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among US adults in 2016 and 2017: population based study.2016 年和 2017 年美国成年人确诊 1 型和 2 型糖尿病的患病率:基于人群的研究。
BMJ. 2018 Sep 4;362:k1497. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1497.
7
The prevalence of diabetes and associated coronary risk factors in urban and rural older Mexican populations.墨西哥城乡老年人群中糖尿病及相关冠心病危险因素的患病率。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1998 Nov;46(11):1387-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb06005.x.
8
Impact of rurality on diabetes screening in the US.农村环境对美国糖尿病筛查的影响。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Sep 26;19(1):1190. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7491-9.
9
Obesity and periodontal disease in young, middle-aged, and older adults.年轻人、中年人和老年人中的肥胖与牙周疾病
J Periodontol. 2003 May;74(5):610-5. doi: 10.1902/jop.2003.74.5.610.
10
Association between diabetes, metabolic syndrome and heart attack in US adults: a cross-sectional analysis using the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System 2015.美国成年人中糖尿病、代谢综合征与心脏病发作之间的关联:使用2015年行为危险因素监测系统的横断面分析
BMJ Open. 2019 Sep 13;9(9):e022990. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022990.

引用本文的文献

1
Self-reported COVID-19 vaccination acceptance and hesitancy among autistic adults.自闭症成人自述的 COVID-19 疫苗接种接受度和犹豫情况。
Vaccine. 2022 May 26;40(24):3288-3293. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.04.060. Epub 2022 Apr 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Patients with Disabilities: Avoiding Unconscious Bias When Discussing Goals of Care.残疾患者:在讨论护理目标时避免无意识偏见。
Am Fam Physician. 2017 Aug 1;96(3):192-195.
2
State and Local Chronic Disease Surveillance Using Electronic Health Record Systems.利用电子健康记录系统进行州和地方慢性病监测。
Am J Public Health. 2017 Sep;107(9):1406-1412. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2017.303874. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
3
Prevalence of Cancer Screening Among Adults With Disabilities, United States, 2013.2013年美国残疾成年人癌症筛查患病率
Prev Chronic Dis. 2017 Jan 26;14:E09. doi: 10.5888/pcd14.160312.
4
Understanding health seeking behavior.了解就医行为。
J Family Med Prim Care. 2016 Apr-Jun;5(2):463-464. doi: 10.4103/2249-4863.192376.
5
Trends in mammography over time for women with and without chronic disability.患有和未患有慢性残疾的女性随时间推移的乳房X光检查趋势。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2015 Jul;24(7):593-601. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2014.5181. Epub 2015 Jun 17.
6
Comparison of bias resulting from two methods of self-reporting height and weight: a validation study.两种自我报告身高和体重方法所产生偏差的比较:一项验证研究。
JRSM Open. 2014 May 6;5(6):2042533313514048. doi: 10.1177/2042533313514048. eCollection 2014 Jun.
7
Dietary patterns are associated with incident stroke and contribute to excess risk of stroke in black Americans.饮食模式与中风事件有关,并导致美国黑人中风风险增加。
Stroke. 2013 Dec;44(12):3305-11. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.113.002636. Epub 2013 Oct 24.
8
Traveling towards disease: transportation barriers to health care access.走向疾病:医疗服务获取的交通障碍。
J Community Health. 2013 Oct;38(5):976-93. doi: 10.1007/s10900-013-9681-1.
9
Missing covariate data in clinical research: when and when not to use the missing-indicator method for analysis.临床研究中协变量数据缺失的情况:何时以及何时不应使用缺失指标法进行分析。
CMAJ. 2012 Aug 7;184(11):1265-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110977. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
10
Quality of diabetes care for adults with physical disabilities in Kansas.堪萨斯州成年肢体残障者的糖尿病护理质量。
Disabil Health J. 2012 Jan;5(1):34-40. doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.09.003.