Suppr超能文献

开发、实施和评估在 新的预印本征集流程的影响。

Development, implementation and impact of a new preprint solicitation process at .

机构信息

Department of Biology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Department of Gender, Women's, and Sexuality Studies, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

出版信息

Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 14;288(1954):20211248. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1248.

Abstract

Preprints are manuscripts posted on a public server that do not yet have formal certification of peer review from a scholarly journal. The increasingly prominent online repositories for these preprints provide a means of rapidly making scientific results accessible to all with an Internet connection. We here describe the catalysis and subsequent development of a successful new process to solicit preprints for consideration for publication in We present preliminary comparisons between the focal topics and geographic origin of submitting authors of papers submitted in the traditional (non-solicited) route versus solicited preprints. This analysis suggests that the solicitation process seems to be achieving one of the primary goals of the preprint solicitation endeavour: broadening the scope of the papers featured in . We also use an informal survey of the early-career scientists that are or have been involved with the Preprint Editorial Team to find that these scientists view their participation positively with respect to career development and knowledge in their field. The inclusion of early-career researchers from across the world in the preprint solicitation process could also translate into social justice benefits by providing a career-building opportunity and a window into the publishing process for young scientists.

摘要

预印本是指发布在公共服务器上的手稿,尚未经过学术期刊的同行评审正式认证。这些预印本的在线存储库越来越多,为所有有互联网连接的人提供了一种快速获取科学成果的途径。我们在这里描述了一个成功的新流程的催化和后续发展,该流程旨在征集预印本来考虑在 上发表。我们展示了传统(非征求)途径投稿与征求预印本投稿的作者的焦点主题和地理来源之间的初步比较。这项分析表明,征求过程似乎实现了预印本征求工作的主要目标之一:扩大 上发表的论文的范围。我们还对参与预印本编辑团队的早期职业科学家进行了非正式调查,发现这些科学家对他们在职业发展和领域知识方面的参与持积极态度。通过为年轻科学家提供职业发展机会和进入出版过程的窗口,将世界各地的早期职业研究人员纳入预印本征求过程也可能带来社会正义方面的好处。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7f13/8277468/9c3b934bd9d4/rspb20211248f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Development, implementation and impact of a new preprint solicitation process at .
Proc Biol Sci. 2021 Jul 14;288(1954):20211248. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.1248.
3
Preprints in Health Professions Education: Raising Awareness and Shifting Culture.
Acad Med. 2023 Jan 1;98(1):17-20. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000005001. Epub 2022 Sep 27.
4
Preprint Servers in Kidney Disease Research: A Rapid Review.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021 Mar 8;16(3):479-486. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03800320. Epub 2020 Jul 17.
5
Analysis of single comments left for bioRxiv preprints till September 2019.
Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2021 Jun 15;31(2):020201. doi: 10.11613/BM.2021.020201. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
7
Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals.
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 10;17(8):e0264661. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264661. eCollection 2022.
9
Current concerns on journal article with preprint: Korean Journal of Internal Medicine perspectives.
Korean J Intern Med. 2023 May;38(3):332-337. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2023.099. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
10
Current concerns on journal article with preprint: Anesthesia and Pain Medicine perspectives.
Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2023 Apr;18(2):97-103. doi: 10.17085/apm.23036. Epub 2023 Apr 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Despite COVID: showcasing new research in evolutionary biology from academic care-givers in the middle of a pandemic.
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Dec 14;289(1988):20222131. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.2131. Epub 2022 Dec 7.
2
A guide to preprinting for early-career researchers.
Biol Open. 2022 Jul 15;11(7). doi: 10.1242/bio.059310. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
3
2021: the year in review.
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Jan 12;289(1966):20212586. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2586. Epub 2022 Jan 5.

本文引用的文献

1
How a torrent of COVID science changed research publishing - in seven charts.
Nature. 2020 Dec;588(7839):553. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-03564-y.
2
A scientist like me: demographic analysis of biology textbooks reveals both progress and long-term lags.
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Jun 24;287(1929):20200877. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.0877.
3
Technical and social issues influencing the adoption of preprints in the life sciences.
PLoS Genet. 2020 Apr 20;16(4):e1008565. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008565. eCollection 2020 Apr.
4
Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints.
Elife. 2019 Apr 24;8:e45133. doi: 10.7554/eLife.45133.
5
On the value of preprints: An early career researcher perspective.
PLoS Biol. 2019 Feb 21;17(2):e3000151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000151. eCollection 2019 Feb.
6
The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s.
PLoS Biol. 2017 Nov 16;15(11):e2003995. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003995. eCollection 2017 Nov.
7
Accelerating scientific publication in biology.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Nov 3;112(44):13439-46. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1511912112. Epub 2015 Oct 27.
8
The case for open preprints in biology.
PLoS Biol. 2013;11(5):e1001563. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001563. Epub 2013 May 14.
9
Citation advantage of open access articles.
PLoS Biol. 2006 May;4(5):e157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040157. Epub 2006 May 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验