Baudendistel Sidney T, Schmitt Abigail C, Stone Amanda E, Raffegeau Tiphanie E, Roper Jaimie A, Hass Chris J
Applied Neuromechanics Laboratory, Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA.
Applied Neuromechanics Laboratory, Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, University of Florida, Gainesville, USA; Department of Health, Human Performance and Recreation, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, 72704, USA.
Gait Posture. 2021 Sep;89:86-91. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2021.07.002. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
The ability to walk at various speeds is essential to independence for older adults. Maintaining fast walking requires changes in spatial-temporal measures, increasing step length and/or decreasing step time. It is unknown how mobility affects the parameters that change between preferred and fast walking.
How does preferred walking performance and measures of strength and mobility relate to the approach (decreasing step time or increasing step length) older adults at risk for mobility disability use to maintain fast walking speeds?.
Peak isokinetic dynamometry of knee and ankle and several mobility evaluations, including the Timed Up-and-Go, Short Physical Performance Battery, and Dynamic Gait Index, assessed mobility and strength in 57 participants, aged 65-80. Biomechanical gait analysis was used to analyze step length, step time, gait speed at preferred and fast gait speeds and ground reaction force during preferred walking. A score combining the differences between step length and time at fast and preferred speeds (Length-Time Difference) separated participants into two groups: (1) Length, representing a predominant increase in step length to walk fast and (2) Time, a predominant decrease in step time.
Those who decreased step time to produce increased speed performed worse during repeated chair stands (p = .006) with no difference in isokinetic strength (p ≥ .15). During preferred walking, the Time group displayed increased propulsive impulse compared to the Length group (p = .007), despite no differences in preferred speed, step length, or time (p ≥ .50).
While kinetics of preferred walking differed between groups separated by Length-Time Difference, basic spatial-temporals of preferred walking did not in this homogenous population. Length-Time Difference relates to a common mobility assessment and could be easily calculated by clinicians to provide a quantitative and more sensitive measure of ambulatory performance.
以各种速度行走的能力对于老年人的独立性至关重要。保持快速行走需要改变时空参数,增加步长和/或减少步幅时间。目前尚不清楚运动能力如何影响在偏好步行和快速步行之间变化的参数。
对于有行动障碍风险的老年人,偏好步行表现以及力量和运动能力的测量指标与他们用于维持快速步行速度的方法(减少步幅时间或增加步长)之间有何关系?
对57名年龄在65至80岁之间的参与者进行膝关节和踝关节的等速肌力测试峰值以及多项运动能力评估,包括定时起立行走测试、简短体能状况量表和动态步态指数,以评估其运动能力和力量。使用生物力学步态分析来分析步长、步幅时间、偏好步态速度和快速步态速度下的步态速度以及偏好步行期间的地面反作用力。一个结合快速和偏好速度下步长和时间差异的分数(长度 - 时间差异)将参与者分为两组:(1)长度组,代表主要通过增加步长来快速行走;(2)时间组,代表主要通过减少步幅时间来快速行走。
那些通过减少步幅时间来提高速度的人在重复椅子站立测试中的表现更差(p = 0.006),等速肌力方面没有差异(p≥0.15)。在偏好步行期间,与长度组相比,时间组显示出推进冲量增加(p = 0.007),尽管在偏好速度、步长或时间方面没有差异(p≥0.50)。
虽然通过长度 - 时间差异分组的两组之间偏好步行的动力学有所不同,但在这个同质人群中,偏好步行的基本时空参数并无差异。长度 - 时间差异与一项常见的运动能力评估相关,临床医生可以轻松计算该指标,以提供对步行表现的定量且更敏感的测量。