Department of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, 510655, People's Republic of China.
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, 26 Yuancun Erheng Road, Guangzhou, 510655, People's Republic of China.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2021 Jul 13;21(1):291. doi: 10.1186/s12876-021-01838-x.
Sometimes in clinical practice, it is a great challenge to distinguish Crohn's disease (CD) and intestinal tuberculosis (ITB), we conducted this study to identify simple and useful algorithm for distinguishing them.
We retrospectively reviewed the medical history of the patients who were diagnosed as ITB or CD. We firstly identified ITB patients, and then the patients diagnosed with CD were matched by age, sex, and admission time in a 1:1 ratio. Patients who admitted between May 1, 2013 and April 30, 2019 were regarded as training cohort, and patients admitted between May 1, 2019 and May 1, 2020 were regarded as validation cohort. We used multivariate analysis to identify the potential variables, and then we used R package rpart to build the classification and regression tree (CART), and validated the newly developed model.
In total, the training cohort included 84 ITB and 84 CD patients, the validation cohort included 22 ITB and 22 CD patients. Multivariate analysis showed that, positive interferon-gamma release assays (IGRAs), ≥ 4 segments involved, longitudinal ulcer, circular ulcer, and aphthous ulcer were confirmed as independent discriminating factors. Using these parameters to build the CART model made an overall accuracy rate was 88.64%, with sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV being 90.91%, 86.36%, 90.48% and 86.96%, respectively.
We developed a simple and novel algorithm model covering laboratory, imaging, and endoscopy parameters with CART to differentiate ITB and CD with good accuracy. Positive IGRAs and circular ulcer were suggestive of ITB, while ≥ 4 segments involved, longitudinal ulcer, and aphthous ulcer were suggestive of CD.
在临床实践中,有时很难区分克罗恩病(CD)和肠结核(ITB),我们进行这项研究是为了确定一种简单而有用的算法来区分它们。
我们回顾性地审查了被诊断为 ITB 或 CD 的患者的病史。我们首先确定 ITB 患者,然后按年龄、性别和入院时间以 1:1 的比例匹配诊断为 CD 的患者。2013 年 5 月 1 日至 2019 年 4 月 30 日入院的患者视为训练队列,2019 年 5 月 1 日至 2020 年 5 月 1 日入院的患者视为验证队列。我们使用多元分析来确定潜在的变量,然后使用 R 包 rpart 构建分类回归树(CART),并验证新开发的模型。
总共有 84 例 ITB 和 84 例 CD 患者纳入训练队列,22 例 ITB 和 22 例 CD 患者纳入验证队列。多元分析表明,干扰素-γ释放试验(IGRAs)阳性、≥4 个节段受累、纵向溃疡、环形溃疡和口疮性溃疡被确认为独立的鉴别因素。使用这些参数构建 CART 模型的总准确率为 88.64%,灵敏度、特异度、阴性预测值和阳性预测值分别为 90.91%、86.36%、90.48%和 86.96%。
我们使用 CART 构建了一个简单而新颖的算法模型,涵盖了实验室、影像学和内镜参数,用于区分 ITB 和 CD,具有良好的准确性。IGRAs 阳性和环形溃疡提示 ITB,而≥4 个节段受累、纵向溃疡和口疮性溃疡提示 CD。