Brown Elizabeth M, Gammon Doris G, Rogers Todd, Coats Ellen M, Olson Lindsay T, Ross Ashley, Engstrom Martha, Nonnemaker James M
Center for Health Analytics, Media, and Policy, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA
Center for Health Analytics, Media, and Policy, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Tob Control. 2022 Dec;31(e2):e134-e139. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056489. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
Ontario, Canada prohibited menthol tobacco product sales beginning 1 January 2017. We measured retail sales of menthol cigarettes and possible substitute products before and after policy implementation in Ontario.
We licensed retail scanner data for tobacco product sales in Ontario and British Columbia (BC), a comparison province without a menthol tobacco policy at that time. We assessed changes in per capita unit sales (per 1000 people) from pre-policy (January-June 2016) to post-policy (January-June 2017) periods. Classification of cigarettes as menthol or non-menthol, or having menthol-suggestive descriptors ('green', 'blue', 'silver' and 'fresh'), was based on scanner data.
Ontario menthol cigarette sales decreased 93%, from 596 to 40 packs per capita compared with a 2% decrease (696 to 679 packs per capita) in BC. Menthol capsule cigarette sales remained low in Ontario (<1% of total cigarette sales) but rose sixfold in BC. Although cigar sales data were unavailable, substitution appeared minimal; sales of non-menthol cigarettes increased 0.4% in Ontario (11 470 to 11 519 packs per capita) while vaping product sales decreased. Ontario had a larger increase in sales of cigarettes with menthol-suggestive descriptors (11% increase) than BC (3% increase). In Ontario, nearly all (>99%) pre-policy sales of cigarettes with 'green' menthol-suggestive descriptors were menthol cigarettes, but post-policy, 94% of 'green' cigarettes sold were non-menthol.
Ontario's menthol policy was associated with a decrease in retail sales of cigarettes classified as menthol, with little evidence of product substitution. Understanding changes in sales of cigarettes with menthol-suggestive descriptors would be informative.
加拿大安大略省自2017年1月1日起禁止销售薄荷醇烟草产品。我们对安大略省政策实施前后薄荷醇香烟及可能的替代产品的零售额进行了测量。
我们获得了安大略省和不列颠哥伦比亚省(BC)烟草产品销售的零售扫描数据许可,BC省作为当时没有薄荷醇烟草政策的对照省份。我们评估了从政策实施前(2016年1月至6月)到政策实施后(2017年1月至6月)人均单位销售额(每1000人)的变化。香烟分为薄荷醇香烟或非薄荷醇香烟,或带有薄荷醇相关描述词(“绿色”、“蓝色”、“银色”和“清新”),分类基于扫描数据。
安大略省薄荷醇香烟销售额下降了93%,人均销售额从596包降至40包,而BC省下降了2%(人均销售额从696包降至679包)。安大略省薄荷醇胶囊香烟销售额一直较低(占香烟总销售额的<1%),但在BC省增长了六倍。尽管雪茄销售数据不可用,但替代情况似乎很少;安大略省非薄荷醇香烟销售额增长了0.4%(人均销售额从11470包增至11519包),而电子烟产品销售额下降。安大略省带有薄荷醇相关描述词的香烟销售额增长幅度(增长11%)大于BC省(增长3%)。在安大略省,政策实施前几乎所有(>99%)带有“绿色”薄荷醇相关描述词的香烟销售都是薄荷醇香烟,但政策实施后,销售的“绿色”香烟中有94%是非薄荷醇香烟。
安大略省的薄荷醇政策与归类为薄荷醇的香烟零售额下降相关,几乎没有产品替代的证据。了解带有薄荷醇相关描述词的香烟销售变化情况会很有帮助。