Children's Hospital Colorado.
University of Colorado School of Medicine.
J Appl Biomech. 2021 Aug 1;37(4):380-387. doi: 10.1123/jab.2020-0391. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
Our purpose was to investigate the reliability and minimal detectable change characteristics of a smartphone-based assessment of single- and dual-task gait and cognitive performance. Uninjured adolescent athletes (n = 17; mean age = 16.6, SD = 1.3 y; 47% female) completed assessments initially and again 4 weeks later. The authors collected data via an automated smartphone-based application while participants completed a series of tasks under (1) single-task cognitive, (2) single-task gait, and (3) dual-task cognitive-gait conditions. The cognitive task was a series of continuous auditory Stroop cues. Average gait speed was consistent between testing sessions in single-task (0.98, SD = 0.21 vs 0.96, SD = 0.19 m/s; P = .60; r = .89) and dual-task (0.92, SD = 0.22 vs 0.89, SD = 0.22 m/s; P = .37; r = .88) conditions. Response accuracy was moderately consistent between assessments in single-task standing (82.3% accurate, SD = 17.9% vs 84.6% accurate, SD = 20.1%; P = .64; r = .52) and dual-task gait (89.4% accurate, SD = 15.9% vs 85.8% accurate, SD = 20.2%; P = .23; r = .81) conditions. Our results indicate automated motor-cognitive dual-task outcomes obtained within a smartphone-based assessment are consistent across a 1-month period. Further research is required to understand how this assessment performs in the setting of sport-related concussion. Given the relative reliability of values obtained, a smartphone-based evaluation may be considered for use to evaluate changes across time among adolescents, postconcussion.
我们的目的是研究基于智能手机的单任务和双任务步态及认知表现评估的可靠性和最小可检测变化特征。未受伤的青少年运动员(n=17;平均年龄=16.6,SD=1.3 y;47%女性)最初完成评估,然后在 4 周后再次完成评估。作者通过自动化的基于智能手机的应用程序收集数据,参与者在(1)单任务认知、(2)单任务步态和(3)双任务认知-步态条件下完成一系列任务。认知任务是一系列连续的听觉斯特鲁普线索。在单任务(0.98,SD=0.21 与 0.96,SD=0.19 m/s;P=.60;r=.89)和双任务(0.92,SD=0.22 与 0.89,SD=0.22 m/s;P=.37;r=.88)条件下,两次测试之间的平均步态速度是一致的。在单任务站立(82.3%准确,SD=17.9%与 84.6%准确,SD=20.1%;P=.64;r=.52)和双任务步态(89.4%准确,SD=15.9%与 85.8%准确,SD=20.2%;P=.23;r=.81)条件下,反应准确性在两次评估之间也存在中等一致性。我们的结果表明,基于智能手机评估获得的自动化运动认知双重任务结果在 1 个月的时间内是一致的。需要进一步研究以了解这种评估在与运动相关的脑震荡环境中的表现。鉴于所获得的数值具有相对可靠性,基于智能手机的评估可能被认为用于评估青少年脑震荡后随时间的变化。