• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Minimal Detectable Change for the ImPACT Subtests at Baseline.基于基线的 ImPACT 测试子测验的最小可检测变化。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Jul 24;39(5):626-634. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae002.
2
Minimal Detectable Change for the ImPACT Test Administered Remotely.远程施测的 ImPACT 测试的最小可检测变化。
J Athl Train. 2023 Nov 1;58(11-12):981-986. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0381.22.
3
Adolescent Subtest Norms for the ImPACT Neurocognitive Battery.ImPACT神经认知测试组合的青少年子测试常模。
Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2015;4(4):266-76. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2014.911094. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
4
Baseline Neurocognitive Performance and Clearance for Athletes to Return to Contact.运动员恢复接触性运动的基线神经认知表现及许可
J Athl Train. 2017 Jan;52(1):51-57. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.12.27. Epub 2016 Dec 1.
5
How Do ImPACT Quick Test Scores Compare with ImPACT Online Scores in Non-Concussed Adolescent Athletes?在未发生脑震荡的青少年运动员中,ImPACT快速测试分数与ImPACT在线测试分数相比如何?
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Apr 20;35(3):326-331. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acz072.
6
The influence of musculoskeletal injury on cognition: implications for concussion research.肌肉骨骼损伤对认知的影响:对脑震荡研究的启示。
Am J Sports Med. 2011 Nov;39(11):2331-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546511413375. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
7
An Examination of Adolescent Athletes and Nonathletes on Baseline Neuropsychological Test Scores.对基线神经心理学测试分数的青少年运动员和非运动员的检查。
J Athl Train. 2018 Apr;53(4):404-409. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-84-17. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
8
Athlete characteristics and outcome scores for computerized neuropsychological assessment: a preliminary analysis.计算机化神经心理学评估的运动员特征与结果分数:一项初步分析。
J Athl Train. 2007 Oct-Dec;42(4):515-23.
9
High Baseline Postconcussion Symptom Scores and Concussion Outcomes in Athletes.运动员的高基线脑震荡后症状评分与脑震荡结局
J Athl Train. 2016 Feb;51(2):136-41. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-51.2.12. Epub 2016 Feb 17.
10
Optimizing Order of Administration for Concussion Baseline Assessment Among NCAA Student-Athletes and Military Cadets.优化美国大学体育协会学生运动员和军校学员脑震荡基线评估的管理顺序
Sports Med. 2022 Jan;52(1):165-176. doi: 10.1007/s40279-021-01493-y. Epub 2021 Jun 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Consensus statement on concussion in sport: the 6th International Conference on Concussion in Sport-Amsterdam, October 2022.运动性脑震荡共识声明:2022 年 10 月在阿姆斯特丹举行的第六届国际运动性脑震荡会议。
Br J Sports Med. 2023 Jun;57(11):695-711. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-106898.
2
Changes in ImPACT Cognitive Subtest Networks Following Sport-Related Concussion.与运动相关的脑震荡后ImPACT认知子测试网络的变化。
Brain Sci. 2023 Jan 20;13(2):177. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13020177.
3
A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors influencing ImPACT concussion testing in high school and collegiate athletes with self-reported ADHD and/or LD.对自我报告患有注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)和/或学习障碍(LD)的高中和大学运动员中影响ImPACT脑震荡测试的因素进行的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neuropsychology. 2023 Feb;37(2):113-132. doi: 10.1037/neu0000870. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
4
Minimal Detectable Change for the ImPACT Test Administered Remotely.远程施测的 ImPACT 测试的最小可检测变化。
J Athl Train. 2023 Nov 1;58(11-12):981-986. doi: 10.4085/1062-6050-0381.22.
5
Utility of VOMS, SCAT3, and ImPACT Baseline Evaluations for Acute Concussion Identification in Collegiate Athletes: Findings From the NCAA-DoD Concussion Assessment, Research and Education (CARE) Consortium.VOMS、SCAT3和ImPACT基线评估在大学生运动员急性脑震荡识别中的效用:来自美国大学体育协会-国防部脑震荡评估、研究与教育(CARE)联盟的研究结果。
Am J Sports Med. 2022 Mar;50(4):1106-1119. doi: 10.1177/03635465211072261. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
6
Assessing Cognitive Decline in High-Functioning Spanish-Speaking Patients: High Score Base Rates on the Spanish-Language NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery.评估高功能西班牙语患者的认知衰退:西班牙语版美国国立卫生研究院工具箱认知电池测试的高分基础率
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Jul 19;37(5):939-951. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acab097.
7
Test-Retest Reliability of Remote ImPACT Administration.远程 IMPACT 测试的重测信度。
Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2022 Feb 23;37(2):449-456. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acab055.
8
Reliability and Minimal Detectable Change for a Smartphone-Based Motor-Cognitive Assessment: Implications for Concussion Management.基于智能手机的运动认知评估的可靠性和最小可检测变化:对脑震荡管理的影响。
J Appl Biomech. 2021 Aug 1;37(4):380-387. doi: 10.1123/jab.2020-0391. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
9
Examining Test-Retest Reliability and Reliable Change for Cognition Endpoints for the CENTER-TBI Neuropsychological Test Battery.检验CENTER-TBI神经心理测试组合认知终点的重测信度和可靠变化。
Front Neurol. 2020 Oct 20;11:541533. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2020.541533. eCollection 2020.
10
Epidemiology of Sport-Related Concussion.与运动相关的脑震荡的流行病学
Clin Sports Med. 2021 Jan;40(1):1-18. doi: 10.1016/j.csm.2020.08.013.

基于基线的 ImPACT 测试子测验的最小可检测变化。

Minimal Detectable Change for the ImPACT Subtests at Baseline.

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, School of Public Health, University of Nevada, Reno, NV, USA.

Athletic Training Research Laboratory, Department of Health Science, The University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA.

出版信息

Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2024 Jul 24;39(5):626-634. doi: 10.1093/arclin/acae002.

DOI:10.1093/arclin/acae002
PMID:38273670
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11269890/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To establish the minimal detectable change (MDC) of the subtests that comprise the composite scores from remotely administered Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) baselines.

METHOD

Remote ImPACT baseline data from 172 (male = 45, female = 127) National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I student-athletes from the 2020 and 2021 athletic preseasons were used to calculate the MDC at the 95%, 90%, and 80% confidence intervals (CIs) for all subtest scores used to generate the four core composite scores and the impulse control composite.

RESULTS

The MDCs for the verbal memory subtests at the 95% CI were 10.31 for word memory percent correct, 4.68 for symbol match total correct hidden, and 18.25 for three letters percentage correct. Visual memory subtest MDCs were 19.03 for design memory total percent correct and 4.90 for XO total correct memory. Visual motor speed subtest MDCs were 18.89 for XO total correct interference and 5.40 for three letters average counted correctly. Reaction time (RT) MDCs were 0.12 for XO average correct, 0.95 for symbol match average correct RT, and 0.28 for color match average correct. Impulse control MDCs were 5.97 for XO total incorrect and 1.15 for color match total commissions. One-way repeated measures MANOVA, repeated measures ANOVAs, and Wilcoxon signed-ranks test all suggested no significant difference between any subtests across two remote ImPACT baselines.

CONCLUSIONS

The ImPACT subtest scores did not significantly change between athletic seasons. Our study suggests the subtests be evaluated in conjunction with the composite scores to provide additional metrics for clinical interpretation.

摘要

目的

确定通过远程即时脑震荡评估和认知测试(ImPACT)基线获得的综合评分子测试的最小可检测变化(MDC)。

方法

使用 2020 年和 2021 年运动赛季中来自全国大学体育协会 I 级的 172 名(男性=45 名,女性=127 名)运动员的远程 ImPACT 基线数据,计算所有用于生成四个核心综合评分和冲动控制综合评分的子测试分数的 95%、90%和 80%置信区间(CI)的 MDC。

结果

言语记忆子测试在 95%CI 时的 MDC 为单词记忆正确百分比的 10.31,符号匹配总正确隐藏的 4.68,以及三个字母正确百分比的 18.25。视觉记忆子测试的 MDC 为设计记忆总正确百分比的 19.03 和 XO 总正确记忆的 4.90。视觉运动速度子测试的 MDC 为 XO 总正确干扰的 18.89 和三个字母平均正确计数的 5.40。反应时间(RT)的 MDC 为 XO 平均正确的 0.12,符号匹配平均正确 RT 的 0.95,以及颜色匹配平均正确的 0.28。冲动控制的 MDC 为 XO 总错误的 5.97 和颜色匹配总错误的 1.15。单因素重复测量 MANOVA、重复测量 ANOVA 和 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验均表明,两个远程 ImPACT 基线之间任何子测试之间没有显着差异。

结论

在运动赛季之间,ImPACT 子测试分数没有显着变化。我们的研究表明,应结合综合评分评估子测试,以提供临床解释的附加指标。