Liu Zhengqun, Zhong Ruqing, Li Kai, Chen Liang, Zhang Bifeng, Liu Lei, Zhang Hongfu
State Key Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Institute of Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, 100193, China.
Institute of Animal Science and Veterinary, Tianjin Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Tianjin, 300381, China.
Anim Nutr. 2021 Jun;7(2):569-575. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2020.07.010. Epub 2021 Apr 20.
The objective of this study was to compare the energy values of high-fiber dietary ingredients with different solubility (sugar beet pulp [SBP] and defatted rice bran [DFRB]) in growing pigs using the difference and the regression methods. A total of 21 barrows (initial BW, 40.5 ± 1.2 kg) were assigned to 3 blocks with BW as a blocking factor, and each block was assigned to a 7 × 2 incomplete Latin square design with 7 diets and two 13-d experimental periods. The 7 experimental diets consisted of a corn-soybean meal basal diet and 6 additional diets containing 10%, 20%, or 30% SBP or DFRB in the basal diet, respectively. Each of the experimental periods lasted 12 d, with a 7 d dietary adaptation period followed by 5-d total fecal and urine collection. Results showed that the digestible energy (DE) and metabolizable energy (ME) of the SBP determined by the difference method with different inclusion levels (10%, 20%, or 30%) were 2,712 and 2,628 kcal/kg, 2,683 and 2,580 kcal/kg, and 2,643 and 2,554 kcal/kg DM basis, respectively. The DE and ME in the DFRB evaluated by the difference method with 3 different inclusion levels were 2,407 and 2,243 kcal/kg, 2,687 and 2,598 kcal/kg, and 2,630 and 2,544 kcal/kg DM basis, respectively. Different inclusion levels had no effects on the energy values of each test ingredient estimated by the difference method. The DE and ME of the SBP and the DFRB estimated by the regression method were 2,562 and 2,472 kcal/kg and 2,685 and 2,606 kcal/kg DM basis, respectively. The energy values of each ingredient determined by the regression method were similar to the values estimated by the difference method with the 20% or 30% inclusion level. However, the energy values of the SBP and DFRB estimated by the difference method with the 10% inclusion level were inconsistent with the values determined by the regression method ( < 0.05). In conclusion, the regression method was a robust indirect method to evaluate the energy values for high-fiber ingredients with different solubility in growing pigs. If the number of experimental animals was limited, the difference method with a moderate inclusion level (at least 20%) of the test high-fiber ingredient in the basal diet could be applied to substitute the regression method.
本研究的目的是采用差值法和回归法比较不同溶解性的高纤维日粮成分(甜菜粕[SBP]和脱脂米糠[DFRB])对生长猪的能量值。总共21头公猪(初始体重,40.5±1.2千克)按体重作为分组因素分为3个区组,每个区组采用7×2不完全拉丁方设计,有7种日粮和两个13天的试验期。7种试验日粮包括玉米 - 豆粕基础日粮和另外6种日粮,分别在基础日粮中含有10%、20%或30%的SBP或DFRB。每个试验期持续12天,先有7天的日粮适应期,随后是5天的粪便和尿液总收集期。结果表明,采用差值法测定的不同添加水平(10%、20%或30%)SBP的消化能(DE)和代谢能(ME),以干物质为基础分别为2,712和2,628千卡/千克、2,683和2,580千卡/千克、2,643和2,554千卡/千克。采用差值法评估的不同添加水平DFRB的DE和ME,以干物质为基础分别为2,407和2,243千卡/千克、2,687和2,598千卡/千克、2,630和2,544千卡/千克。不同添加水平对差值法估算的各试验成分能量值无影响。采用回归法估算的SBP和DFRB的DE和ME,以干物质为基础分别为2,562和2,472千卡/千克以及2,685和2,606千卡/千克。回归法测定的各成分能量值与20%或30%添加水平差值法估算的值相似。然而,10%添加水平差值法估算的SBP和DFRB能量值与回归法测定的值不一致(P<0.05)。总之,回归法是评估生长猪中不同溶解性高纤维成分能量值的可靠间接方法。如果实验动物数量有限,基础日粮中试验高纤维成分添加水平适中(至少20%)的差值法可用于替代回归法。