• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

眼内注射后眼内气泡:综合分析。

Intravitreal air bubbles following intravitreal injections: a comprehensive analysis.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Tel Aviv Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Department of Ophthalmology, Meir Medical Center, 59 Tshernichovsky St, 4428164, Kfar Saba, Israel.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;259(12):3697-3702. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05302-0. Epub 2021 Jul 14.

DOI:10.1007/s00417-021-05302-0
PMID:34258656
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence of residual air bubbles following intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents, and to compare two techniques designed to reduce their occurrence.

METHODS

Patients who received intravitreal injections reported the presence of air bubbles following the procedure, and were followed to determine when they disappeared. Two techniques used to reduce air bubbles prior to injection were compared-tapping the syringe with the needle up ("upwards" technique) or down ("downwards" technique). Rates of residual air bubbles were compared between techniques, and between different drugs.

RESULTS

The study included 344 intravitreal injections, 172 injected with each technique. The overall rate of residual air bubbles was 11.3%, with 94.9% resolution by 48 h. The rate was significantly lower with the "downwards" technique (7.5% vs. 15.1%, p = 0.027). It was also significantly lower with ranibizumab injected using pre-filled syringes than with bevacizumab and aflibercept (0% vs. 12.1% and 14.7%, p < 0.0001). A questionnaire revealed patients reported medium levels of discomfort and a high importance of avoiding air bubbles.

CONCLUSIONS

Residual air bubbles are a common occurrence, likely to be experienced by most patients undergoing repeated injections. This phenomenon may be significantly reduced by using the described "downwards" technique, or pre-filled syringes.

摘要

目的

评估抗 VEGF 药物玻璃体内注射后残余气泡的发生率,并比较两种旨在减少气泡发生的技术。

方法

接受玻璃体内注射的患者报告了治疗后存在气泡的情况,并进行了随访以确定气泡何时消失。比较了两种在注射前减少气泡的技术——将注射器针头朝上(“朝上”技术)或朝下(“朝下”技术)敲击。比较了两种技术之间以及不同药物之间残余气泡的发生率。

结果

本研究纳入了 344 例玻璃体内注射,其中 172 例分别采用两种技术进行注射。残余气泡的总体发生率为 11.3%,48 小时内 94.9%的气泡消失。“朝下”技术的发生率显著降低(7.5% vs. 15.1%,p = 0.027)。与贝伐单抗和阿柏西普相比,使用预装注射器注射雷珠单抗的发生率也显著降低(0% vs. 12.1%和 14.7%,p < 0.0001)。问卷调查显示,患者报告了中等程度的不适,且避免气泡的重要性很高。

结论

残余气泡是一种常见现象,可能会被大多数接受重复注射的患者所经历。通过使用描述的“朝下”技术或预装注射器可以显著减少这种现象。

相似文献

1
Intravitreal air bubbles following intravitreal injections: a comprehensive analysis.眼内注射后眼内气泡:综合分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2021 Dec;259(12):3697-3702. doi: 10.1007/s00417-021-05302-0. Epub 2021 Jul 14.
2
Postinjection Endophthalmitis Rates and Characteristics Following Intravitreal Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, and Aflibercept.玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗和阿柏西普后的注射后眼内炎发生率及特征
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 May;165:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Mar 2.
3
Comparison of endophthalmitis rates following intravitreal injection of compounded bevacizumab, ranibizumab, and aflibercept.玻璃体内注射复方贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗和阿柏西普后眼内炎发生率的比较。
Can J Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;52(6):616-619. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjo.2017.04.016. Epub 2017 Jun 23.
4
Vitreomacular Interface after Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.抗血管内皮生长因子注射治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性后的玻璃体内黄斑界面。
Ophthalmology. 2015 Aug;122(8):1569-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2015.04.028. Epub 2015 May 30.
5
Cost of Ranibizumab Port Delivery System vs Intravitreal Injections for Patients With Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.雷珠单抗注射给药系统与玻璃体内注射治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性患者的成本比较。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2022 Jul 1;140(7):716-723. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2022.1819.
6
Same-Day Bilateral Intravitreal Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Injections: Experience of a Large Canadian Retina Center.同一天行双侧玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子注射:加拿大一大型视网膜中心的经验。
Ophthalmologica. 2019;242(1):1-7. doi: 10.1159/000499115. Epub 2019 Mar 29.
7
A comparison of responses to intravitreal bevacizumab, ranibizumab, or aflibercept injections for neovascular age-related macular degeneration.玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗或阿柏西普治疗新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性的疗效比较。
Int Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct;37(5):1205-1214. doi: 10.1007/s10792-016-0391-4. Epub 2016 Nov 8.
8
The Effect of Syringe-Filling Technique on the Risk for Endophthalmitis after Intravitreal Injection of Anti-VEGF Agents.针筒灌洗技术对玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子药物后眼内炎风险的影响。
Ophthalmologica. 2022;245(1):34-40. doi: 10.1159/000518236. Epub 2021 Jul 23.
9
Risk of Systemic Adverse Events after Intravitreal Bevacizumab, Ranibizumab, and Aflibercept in Routine Clinical Practice.在常规临床实践中玻璃体内注射贝伐单抗、雷珠单抗和阿柏西普的全身不良事件风险。
Ophthalmology. 2021 Mar;128(3):417-424. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.07.062. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
10
Risk of Intraocular Pressure Increase With Intravitreal Injections of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Inhibitors: A Cohort Study.血管内皮生长因子抑制剂玻璃体内注射致眼内压升高的风险:一项队列研究。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2023 Apr;248:45-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2022.11.015. Epub 2022 Nov 21.

引用本文的文献

1
[Complaints and complications after intravitreal injection (IVI) and potential risk factors].玻璃体内注射后的投诉、并发症及潜在风险因素
Ophthalmologie. 2025 Mar 31. doi: 10.1007/s00347-025-02222-w.
2
Clinical Outcomes and Experiences with Prefilled Syringes Versus Vials for Intravitreal Administration of Anti-VEGF Treatments: A Systematic Review.玻璃体内注射抗VEGF治疗中预充式注射器与药瓶的临床结局及经验:一项系统评价
Ophthalmol Ther. 2024 Sep;13(9):2445-2465. doi: 10.1007/s40123-024-01002-0. Epub 2024 Jul 27.

本文引用的文献

1
[Benefit of ocular draping on bacterial contamination after intravitreal injection using a plate-type eyelid speculum].[使用平板型眼睑撑开器进行玻璃体腔内注射后眼部遮盖对细菌污染的益处]
Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi. 2014 Aug;118(8):640-4.
2
Reducing oral flora contamination of intravitreal injections with face mask or silence.使用口罩或保持安静减少玻璃体腔内注射时的口腔菌群污染。
Retina. 2012 Mar;32(3):473-6. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0B013E31822C2958.