Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital and Institute, Beijing, 100142, China.
State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China.
Sci China Life Sci. 2021 Aug;64(8):1199-1211. doi: 10.1007/s11427-021-1966-4. Epub 2021 Jul 9.
While precision medicine driven by genome sequencing has revolutionized cancer care, such as lung cancer, its impact on gastric cancer (GC) has been minimal. GC patients are routinely treated with chemotherapy, but only a fraction of them receive the clinical benefit. There is an urgent need to develop biomarkers or algorithms to select chemo-sensitive patients or apply targeted therapy. Here, we carried out retrospective analyses of 1,020 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded GC surgical resection samples from 5 hospitals and developed a mass spectrometry-based workflow for proteomic subtyping of GC. We identified two proteomic subtypes: the chemo-sensitive group (CSG) and the chemo-insensitive group (CIG) in the discovery set. The 5-year overall survival of CSG was significantly improved in patients who had received adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery compared with those who received surgery only (64.2% vs. 49.6%; Cox P-value=0.002), whereas no such improvement was observed in CIG (50.0% vs. 58.6%; Cox P-value=0.495). We validated these results in an independent validation set. Further, differential proteome analysis uncovered 9 FDA-approved drugs that may be applicable for targeted therapy of GC. A prospective study is warranted to test these findings for future GC patient care.
虽然基于基因组测序的精准医学已经彻底改变了癌症治疗,例如肺癌,但它对胃癌(GC)的影响却微乎其微。GC 患者通常接受化疗,但只有一部分患者从中受益。因此,迫切需要开发生物标志物或算法来选择化疗敏感的患者或应用靶向治疗。在这里,我们对来自 5 家医院的 1020 例福尔马林固定、石蜡包埋的 GC 手术切除样本进行了回顾性分析,并开发了基于质谱的 GC 蛋白质组亚型分析工作流程。我们在发现集中确定了两种蛋白质组亚型:化疗敏感组(CSG)和化疗不敏感组(CIG)。与仅接受手术的患者相比,接受术后辅助化疗的 CSG 患者的 5 年总生存率显著提高(64.2% vs. 49.6%;Cox P 值=0.002),而 CIG 则没有观察到这种改善(50.0% vs. 58.6%;Cox P 值=0.495)。我们在独立验证集中验证了这些结果。此外,差异蛋白质组分析揭示了 9 种可能适用于 GC 靶向治疗的已批准的 FDA 药物。有必要进行一项前瞻性研究来检验这些发现,以用于未来的 GC 患者治疗。