Park Jenny, Saha Somnath, Chee Brant, Taylor Janiece, Beach Mary Catherine
Oregon Health and Science University, Portland.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jul 1;4(7):e2117052. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.17052.
Negative attitudes toward patients can adversely impact health care quality and contribute to health disparities. Stigmatizing language written in a patient's medical record can perpetuate negative attitudes and influence decision-making of clinicians subsequently caring for that patient.
To identify and describe physician language in patient health records that may reflect, or engender in others, negative and positive attitudes toward the patient.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study analyzed randomly selected encounter notes from electronic medical records in the ambulatory internal medicine setting at an urban academic medical center. The 600 encounter notes were written by 138 physicians in 2017. Data were analyzed in 2019.
Common linguistic characteristics reflecting an overall positive or negative attitude toward the patient.
A total of 138 clinicians wrote encounter notes about 507 patients. Of these patients, 350 (69%) were identified as female, 406 (80%) were identified as Black/African American, and 76 (15%) were identified as White. Of 600 encounter notes included in this study, there were 5 major themes representing negative language and 6 themes representing positive language. The majority of negative language was not explicit and generally fell into one or more of the following categories: (1) questioning patient credibility, (2) expressing disapproval of patient reasoning or self-care, (3) stereotyping by race or social class, (4) portraying the patient as difficult, and (5) emphasizing physician authority over the patient. Positive language was more often more explicit and included (1) direct compliments, (2) expressions of approval, (3) self-disclosure of the physician's own positive feelings toward the patient, (4) minimization of blame, (5) personalization, and (6) highlighting patient authority for their own decisions.
This qualitative study found that physicians express negative and positive attitudes toward patients when documenting in the medical record. Although often not explicit, this language could potentially transmit bias and affect the quality of care that patients subsequently receive. These findings suggest that increased physician awareness when writing and reading medical records is needed to prevent the perpetuation of negative bias in medical care.
对患者的负面态度会对医疗质量产生不利影响,并导致健康差距。患者病历中带有污名化的语言会使负面态度长期存在,并影响后续照料该患者的临床医生的决策。
识别并描述患者健康记录中医生使用的、可能反映对患者的负面或正面态度,或在他人心中引发此类态度的语言。
设计、背景和参与者:这项定性研究分析了从城市学术医疗中心门诊内科环境下的电子病历中随机选取的诊疗记录。这600份诊疗记录由138名医生在2017年撰写。数据于2019年进行分析。
反映对患者总体正面或负面态度的常见语言特征。
共有138名临床医生撰写了关于507名患者的诊疗记录。在这些患者中,350名(69%)被认定为女性,406名(80%)被认定为黑人/非裔美国人,76名(15%)被认定为白人。在本研究纳入的600份诊疗记录中,有5个主要主题代表负面语言,6个主题代表正面语言。大多数负面语言并不明确,通常属于以下一个或多个类别:(1)质疑患者的可信度,(2)对患者的推理或自我护理表示不满,(3)按种族或社会阶层进行刻板印象,(4)将患者描述为难缠,(5)强调医生对患者的权威。正面语言通常更明确,包括(1)直接称赞,(2)表示认可,(3)医生自我表露对患者的积极感受,(4)尽量减少指责,(5)个性化,(6)强调患者对自身决策的自主权。
这项定性研究发现,医生在病历记录中会表达对患者的负面和正面态度。尽管这种语言通常不明确,但可能会传递偏见并影响患者随后接受的护理质量。这些发现表明,医生在书写和阅读病历时需要提高意识,以防止医疗护理中负面偏见的持续存在。