• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于急性护理环境中翻身间隔和支撑面比较压疮发生率:准实验性实用研究。

Comparing Pressure Injury Incidence Based on Repositioning Intervals and Support Surfaces in Acute Care Settings: A Quasi-Experimental Pragmatic Study.

机构信息

Jeong Sil Choi, PhD, RN, is Professor, College of Nursing, Gachon University, Incheon, South Korea. Seon Young Hyun, RN, is Nurse, Gachon University Gil Medical Center. Sun Ju Chang, PhD, RN, is Associate Professor, College of Nursing, Research Institute of Nursing Science, Seoul National University. The authors have disclosed no financial relationships related to this article. Submitted July 22, 2020; accepted in revised form December 22, 2020.

出版信息

Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021 Aug 1;34(8):1-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000755912.27170.9a.

DOI:10.1097/01.ASW.0000755912.27170.9a
PMID:34260424
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare pressure injury (PI) incidence based on repositioning intervals and support surfaces in acute care settings.

METHODS

This pragmatic, quasi-experimental trial recruited a total of 251 critically ill patients who were at low or moderate risk for PI development. Participants were assigned to three interventions: a 2-hour repositioning interval using an air mattress, a 2-hour repositioning interval using a foam mattress, or a 3-hour repositioning interval using a foam mattress. Data were collected by nurses every shift over the course of 14 days. Pressure injury incidence was analyzed using a χ2 test.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in PI incidence between the groups with a 2-hour repositioning interval. However, the PI incidence in the group using a foam mattress with a 3-hour repositioning interval was significantly lower than in the group using an air mattress with a 2-hour repositioning interval (odds ratio, 0.481; 95% confidence interval, 0.410-0.565).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings showed that PIs decreased when the repositioning interval was extended from every 2 hours to every 3 hours while using foam mattresses. This study suggests that a 3-hour repositioning interval using a foam mattress could be applied to reduce the risk of PI development for patients at low or moderate risk.

摘要

目的

比较急性护理环境中基于翻身间隔和支撑面的压力性损伤(PI)发生率。

方法

这项实用、准实验性试验共招募了 251 名患有低度或中度 PI 风险的危重症患者。参与者被分配到三个干预组:使用空气床垫的 2 小时翻身间隔、使用泡沫床垫的 2 小时翻身间隔或使用泡沫床垫的 3 小时翻身间隔。护士每班次在 14 天内收集数据。使用 χ2 检验分析 PI 发生率。

结果

在 2 小时翻身间隔组之间,PI 发生率无统计学差异。然而,使用泡沫床垫且 3 小时翻身间隔组的 PI 发生率明显低于使用空气床垫且 2 小时翻身间隔组(比值比,0.481;95%置信区间,0.410-0.565)。

结论

研究结果表明,使用泡沫床垫时,将翻身间隔从每 2 小时延长至每 3 小时可降低 PI 发生率。本研究表明,对于低度或中度风险的患者,使用泡沫床垫且每 3 小时翻身一次可降低 PI 发生风险。

相似文献

1
Comparing Pressure Injury Incidence Based on Repositioning Intervals and Support Surfaces in Acute Care Settings: A Quasi-Experimental Pragmatic Study.基于急性护理环境中翻身间隔和支撑面比较压疮发生率:准实验性实用研究。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2021 Aug 1;34(8):1-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000755912.27170.9a.
2
A Multicenter, Comparative Study of Two Pressure-Redistribution Mattresses with Repositioning Intervals for Critical Care Patients.多中心、对比研究两种压力再分布床垫在重症监护患者中的应用及翻身间隔时间。
Adv Skin Wound Care. 2020 Mar;33(3):1-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000653160.13611.5d.
3
Alternating pressure (active) air surfaces for preventing pressure ulcers.交替压力(主动)空气垫预防压疮。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 10;5(5):CD013620. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013620.pub2.
4
Comparing alternating pressure mattresses and high-specification foam mattresses to prevent pressure ulcers in high-risk patients: the PRESSURE 2 RCT.比较交替式压力床垫和高规格泡沫床垫预防高危患者压疮的效果:PRESSURE 2 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2019 Sep;23(52):1-176. doi: 10.3310/hta23520.
5
Pressure ulcer prevention: an evidence-based analysis.压力性溃疡的预防:基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(2):1-104. Epub 2009 Apr 1.
6
Pressure ulcer incidence and progression in critically ill subjects: influence of low air loss mattress versus a powered air pressure redistribution mattress.重症患者的压疮发生率和进展:低气压损失床垫与动力空气压力再分布床垫的影响。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2012 May-Jun;39(3):267-73. doi: 10.1097/WON.0b013e3182514c50.
7
The Efficacy of a Viscoelastic Foam Overlay on Prevention of Pressure Injury in Acutely Ill Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.一种粘弹性泡沫敷料预防急性病患者压力性损伤的疗效:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. 2017 Sep/Oct;44(5):440-444. doi: 10.1097/WON.0000000000000359.
8
Alternative reactive support surfaces (non-foam and non-air-filled) for preventing pressure ulcers.替代型反应性支持表面(非泡沫和非充气式)预防压疮。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 6;5(5):CD013623. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013623.pub2.
9
Comparing a patient positioning system to an overhead LIFT with pillows for impact on turning effectiveness.比较一种患者定位系统与使用枕头的头顶 LIFT(头架)对转头效果的影响。
Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2020 Aug;59:102847. doi: 10.1016/j.iccn.2020.102847. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
10
Pressure relieving support surfaces: a randomised evaluation.减压支撑面:一项随机评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Jul;10(22):iii-iv, ix-x, 1-163. doi: 10.3310/hta10220.