Suppr超能文献

"":一项关于患者对初级姑息治疗干预措施看法的定性研究。

"": A Qualitative Study of Patient Perceptions of a Primary Palliative Care Intervention.

机构信息

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

Division of Pulmonary Sciences and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2022 Jan;25(1):28-38. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0015. Epub 2021 Jul 14.

Abstract

Primary palliative care is needed to meet the complex needs of patients with serious illness and their families. However, patient perceptions of primary palliative care are not well understood and can inform subsequent primary palliative care interventions and implementation. Elicit the patient perspective on a primary palliative care intervention, Collaborative Care to Alleviate Symptoms and Adjust to Illness (CASA), from patient perspectives. Qualitative study using patient interviews and two methods of triangulation. Between July 2014 and September 2015, we interviewed 45 patients who participated in the intervention in a Veterans Affairs (VA) (primary site), academic, and urban safety-net health system in the United States. Participants were asked about what was most and least helpful, how the intervention affected participants' lives, and what should be changed about the intervention. Data were analyzed using a general inductive approach. To enhance validity of the results, we triangulated the findings from patient interviews, reviews of care coordinator documentation, and interprofessional palliative care providers. The six themes identified that primary care intervention: (1) Cared for My Psychosocial Needs, (2) Encouraged Self-Management, (3) Medication Recommendations Worked, (4) Facilitated Goal Attainment, (5) Team was Beneficial, and (6) Good Visit Timing. Participants experienced benefits from the primary palliative care intervention and attributed these benefits to individualized assessment and support, facilitation of skill building and self-management, and oversight from an interprofessional care team. Future primary palliative care interventions may benefit from targeting these specific patient-valued processes.

摘要

初级姑息治疗是满足重病患者及其家属复杂需求的必要手段。然而,患者对初级姑息治疗的看法尚未得到充分了解,这可以为后续的初级姑息治疗干预和实施提供信息。从患者的角度出发,了解他们对初级姑息治疗干预措施——协作式照护以减轻症状和适应疾病(CASA)的看法。这是一项使用患者访谈和两种三角测量方法的定性研究。在 2014 年 7 月至 2015 年 9 月期间,我们在美国退伍军人事务部(VA)(主要地点)、学术和城市医疗保障系统中采访了 45 名参与该干预措施的患者。参与者被问及哪些方面最有帮助,哪些方面最没有帮助,该干预措施如何影响他们的生活,以及该干预措施应该做哪些改变。我们使用一般归纳法对数据进行分析。为了提高研究结果的有效性,我们将患者访谈、护理协调员记录的审查以及多专业姑息治疗提供者的结果进行了三角测量。确定的六个主题包括:(1)满足了我的心理社会需求,(2)鼓励自我管理,(3)药物推荐有效,(4)促进了目标的实现,(5)团队很有帮助,(6)就诊时间合适。参与者从初级姑息治疗干预中获得了益处,并将这些益处归因于个性化评估和支持、促进技能培养和自我管理以及多专业护理团队的监督。未来的初级姑息治疗干预可能会受益于针对这些特定患者重视的过程。

相似文献

3
5
Feasibility of a rural palliative supportive service.农村姑息支持服务的可行性
Rural Remote Health. 2015 Apr-Jun;15(2):3116. Epub 2015 May 4.
10

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验