Department of Molecular Biosciences, School of Veterinary Medicine and Department of Nutrition, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Institute for Physiology and Biochemistry of Nutrition, Max Rubner-Institut, 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Oct 21;106(11):3248-3264. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab508.
Studies in rodents and humans suggest that high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS)-sweetened diets promote greater metabolic dysfunction than sucrose-sweetened diets.
To compare the effects of consuming sucrose-sweetened beverage (SB), HFCS-SB, or a control beverage sweetened with aspartame on metabolic outcomes in humans.
A parallel, double-blinded, NIH-funded study. Experimental procedures were conducted during 3.5 days of inpatient residence with controlled feeding at a research clinic before (baseline) and after a 12-day outpatient intervention period. Seventy-five adults (18-40 years) were assigned to beverage groups matched for sex, body mass index (18-35 kg/m2), and fasting triglyceride, lipoprotein and insulin concentrations. The intervention was 3 servings/day of sucrose- or HFCS-SB providing 25% of energy requirement or aspartame-SB, consumed for 16 days. Main outcome measures were %hepatic lipid, Matsuda insulin sensitivity index (ISI), and Predicted M ISI.
Sucrose-SB increased %hepatic lipid (absolute change: 0.6 ± 0.2%) compared with aspartame-SB (-0.2 ± 0.2%, P < 0.05) and compared with baseline (P < 0.001). HFCS-SB increased %hepatic lipid compared with baseline (0.4 ± 0.2%, P < 0.05). Compared with aspartame-SB, Matsuda ISI decreased after consumption of HFCS- (P < 0.01) and sucrose-SB (P < 0.01), and Predicted M ISI decreased after consumption of HFCS-SB (P < 0.05). Sucrose- and HFCS-SB increased plasma concentrations of lipids, lipoproteins, and uric acid compared with aspartame-SB. No outcomes were differentially affected by sucrose- compared with HFCS-SB. Beverage group effects remained significant when analyses were adjusted for changes in body weight.
Consumption of both sucrose- and HFCS-SB induced detrimental changes in hepatic lipid, insulin sensitivity, and circulating lipids, lipoproteins and uric acid in 2 weeks.
啮齿动物和人类的研究表明,高果糖玉米糖浆(HFCS)甜味饮料比蔗糖甜味饮料更能促进代谢功能障碍。
比较饮用蔗糖甜味饮料(SB)、HFCS-SB 或用阿斯巴甜甜味的对照饮料对人类代谢结果的影响。
一项平行、双盲、由美国国立卫生研究院资助的研究。实验程序在研究诊所住院的 3.5 天内进行,在 12 天的门诊干预期前后进行受控喂养。75 名成年人(18-40 岁)按性别、体重指数(18-35kg/m2)和空腹甘油三酯、脂蛋白和胰岛素浓度分配给饮料组。干预措施为每天 3 份蔗糖或 HFCS-SB,提供 25%的能量需求,或阿斯巴甜-SB,连续 16 天。主要观察指标为肝脂质百分比、Matsuda 胰岛素敏感性指数(ISI)和预测 M ISI。
与阿斯巴甜-SB 相比,蔗糖-SB 增加了肝脂质百分比(绝对值变化:0.6±0.2%,P<0.05)和与基线相比(P<0.001)。与基线相比,HFCS-SB 增加了肝脂质百分比(0.4±0.2%,P<0.05)。与阿斯巴甜-SB 相比,HFCS-SB 和蔗糖-SB 摄入后 Matsuda ISI 降低(P<0.01),HFCS-SB 摄入后预测 M ISI 降低(P<0.05)。与阿斯巴甜-SB 相比,蔗糖-SB 和 HFCS-SB 增加了血浆脂质、脂蛋白和尿酸浓度。与蔗糖-SB 相比,HFCS-SB 对这些结果没有影响。当分析调整体重变化时,饮料组的影响仍然显著。
在 2 周内,饮用蔗糖-SB 和 HFCS-SB 均导致肝脂质、胰岛素敏感性以及循环脂质、脂蛋白和尿酸发生有害变化。