Suppr超能文献

多中心、随机临床试验比较玻璃体内阿柏西普单药治疗与阿柏西普联合低强度光动力疗法(RF-PDT)治疗息肉样脉络膜血管病变。

Multicentre, randomised clinical trial comparing intravitreal aflibercept monotherapy versus aflibercept combined with reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy (RF-PDT) for the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy.

机构信息

Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore.

Medical Retina, Singapore National Eye Centre, Singapore.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2021 Jul 15;11(7):e050252. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050252.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept (IVA) monotherapy versus aflibercept combined with reduced-fluence photodynamic therapy (RF-PDT) (IVA+RF-PDT) for the treatment of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (PCV).

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Multicentred, double-masked, randomised controlled trial to compare the two treatment modalities. The primary outcome of the study is to compare the 52-week visual outcome of IVA versus IVA+RF PDT. One hundred and sixty treatment-naïve patients with macular PCV confirmed on indocyanine green angiography will be recruited from three centres in Singapore. Eligible patients will be randomised (1:1 ratio) into one of the following groups: IVA monotherapy group-aflibercept monotherapy with sham photodynamic therapy (n=80); combination group-aflibercept with RF-PDT (n=80). Following baseline visit, all patients will be monitored at 4 weekly intervals during which disease activity will be assessed based on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ophthalmic examination findings, optical coherence tomography (OCT) and angiography where indicated. Eyes that meet protocol-specified retreatment criteria will receive IVA and sham/RF-PDT according to their randomisation group. Primary endpoint will be assessed as change in BCVA at week 52 from baseline. Secondary endpoints will include anatomical changes based on OCT and dye angiography as well as safety assessment. Additionally, we will be collecting optical coherence tomography angiography data prospectively for exploratory analysis.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study will be conducted in accordance with the ethical principles that have their origin in the Declaration of Helsinki and that are consistent with the ICH E6 guidelines of Good Clinical Practice and the applicable regulatory requirements. Approval from the SingHealth Centralised Institutional Review Board has been sought prior to commencement of the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03941587.

摘要

目的

比较玻璃体内注射阿柏西普(IVA)单药治疗与阿柏西普联合低强度光动力疗法(RF-PDT)(IVA+RF-PDT)治疗息肉状脉络膜血管病变(PCV)的疗效和安全性。

方法和分析

多中心、双盲、随机对照试验,比较两种治疗方式。该研究的主要结局是比较 IVA 与 IVA+RF-PDT 治疗 52 周的视力结果。将从新加坡的三个中心招募 160 名经吲哚菁绿血管造影证实的黄斑 PCV 初治患者。符合条件的患者将按照 1:1 的比例随机分为以下两组之一:IVA 单药治疗组-阿柏西普单药联合假光动力疗法(n=80);联合治疗组-阿柏西普联合 RF-PDT(n=80)。在基线访视后,所有患者将每 4 周监测一次,在此期间将根据最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、眼科检查结果、光学相干断层扫描(OCT)和血管造影(如有需要)评估疾病活动情况。符合方案规定的再治疗标准的眼将根据其随机分组接受 IVA 和假/RF-PDT。主要终点将评估从基线到第 52 周时 BCVA 的变化。次要终点包括基于 OCT 和染料血管造影的解剖学变化以及安全性评估。此外,我们将前瞻性地收集光学相干断层扫描血管造影数据进行探索性分析。

伦理和传播

本研究将按照源于《赫尔辛基宣言》的伦理原则进行,并且符合 ICH E6 指导原则的良好临床实践和适用的监管要求。在开始研究之前,已向 SingHealth 集中机构审查委员会寻求批准。

试验注册号

NCT03941587。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2c67/8286776/96ae412ea65e/bmjopen-2021-050252f01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验