Gyawali Bishal, Jalink Matthew, Effing Sophie Marie Anne, Dalgarno Nancy, Kolomitro Klodiana, Thapa Niresh, Poudyal Bishesh Sharma, Berry Scott
Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen's University, 10 Stuart Street, 2nd Level, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada.
Ecancermedicalscience. 2021 Jun 3;15:1241. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1241. eCollection 2021.
Due to the increasing global burden of cancer and the shortage of trained medical oncologists, training General Practitioners (GPs) in Oncology (known as GPOs) has been proposed as a means to potentially ease some burden on medical oncologists with heavy workloads, especially in low-and-middle-income countries (LMICs), by task-sharing and task-shifting. We undertook a scoping review to identify and characterise the existing training programmes and curricula for GPOs globally.
We searched three major electronic databases: EMBASE, Medline/PubMed and Education Source for articles that described a medical oncology training programme for GPs. All study types were eligible in this review. We followed a two-stage standardised screening process using two independent reviewers to evaluate the eligibility of the articles.
Five peer-reviewed articles were included in our review and grey literature scans identified an additional seven GPO training programmes for a total of 12 programmes and their curricula. All of the included studies were from high-income countries. The duration of programmes varied from comprehensive programmes structured over 2 years ( = 2) to shorter duration medical oncology training activities ( = 2), a short, 1.5-day workshop and a 10-hour course. In the grey literature, GPO training programme durations ranged from 2 weeks to 13 months. A mixture of delivery methods was employed including didactic lectures and clinical rotations.
This scoping review identified a small number of heterogeneous studies and grey literature sources that described and/or evaluated medical oncology training programmes for GPs. The information synthesised here can be used to foster the collaboration needed for the continued development of GPO programmes that could help address the problem of lack of workforce to meet the rising burden of cancer, especially in LMICs.
由于全球癌症负担日益加重,且训练有素的医学肿瘤学家短缺,因此有人提议对全科医生进行肿瘤学培训(称为全科医生肿瘤学培训),以期通过任务分担和任务转移,减轻工作量繁重的医学肿瘤学家的负担,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)。我们进行了一项范围综述,以识别和描述全球现有的全科医生肿瘤学培训项目和课程。
我们检索了三个主要电子数据库:EMBASE、Medline/PubMed和教育资源数据库,以查找描述全科医生医学肿瘤学培训项目的文章。所有研究类型均符合本综述要求。我们采用两阶段标准化筛选流程,由两名独立评审员评估文章的合格性。
我们的综述纳入了五篇同行评审文章,灰色文献扫描又识别出另外七个全科医生肿瘤学培训项目,共计12个项目及其课程。所有纳入研究均来自高收入国家。项目时长各不相同,从为期两年的综合项目(n = 2)到较短时长的医学肿瘤学培训活动(n = 2),即一个为期1.5天的研讨会和一个10小时的课程。在灰色文献中,全科医生肿瘤学培训项目时长从2周到13个月不等。采用了多种授课方式,包括理论讲座和临床轮转。
本范围综述识别出少量描述和/或评估全科医生医学肿瘤学培训项目的异质性研究和灰色文献来源。此处综合的信息可用于促进全科医生肿瘤学培训项目持续发展所需的合作,这有助于解决劳动力短缺问题,以应对不断增加的癌症负担,尤其是在低收入和中等收入国家。