• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The status of psychological testing in clinical psychology: relationships between test use and professional activities and orientations.

作者信息

Wade T C, Baker T B, Morton T L, Baker L J

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 1978 Feb;42(1):3-10. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4201_1.

DOI:10.1207/s15327752jpa4201_1
PMID:342683
Abstract

A survey of clinical psychologists determined that both objective and projective tests were used with high frequency. The two tests clinicians most frequently recommended clinical students learn to administer were projective (the Rorschach and the TAT) and, among the 10 most frequently recommended tests, projective tests were recommended approximately 30% more often than objective tests. Clinicians who were frequent test users recommended both objective and projective tests more often than those not using tests. Clinicians doing substantial teaching and research tended to recommend projective tests less often than clinicians not engaged in those activities. Behavior therapists recommended projective tests less often than eclectic, Freudian, and neo-Freudian therapists.

摘要

相似文献

1
The status of psychological testing in clinical psychology: relationships between test use and professional activities and orientations.
J Pers Assess. 1978 Feb;42(1):3-10. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4201_1.
2
The clinical interpretation of psychological tests. Introduction.
Int Psychiatry Clin. 1966 Spring;3(1):1-20.
3
[Using projective tests in forensic psychiatry may lead to wrong conclusions. Only empirically tested tests should be used].[在法医精神病学中使用投射测验可能会导致错误的结论。应仅使用经过实证检验的测验]。
Lakartidningen. 2001 Jun 27;98(26-27):3118-23.
4
A critique of Lilienfeld et al.'s (2000) "The scientific status of projective techniques".对利连菲尔德等人(2000年)《投射技术的科学地位》的评论
J Pers Assess. 2003 Jun;80(3):260-71. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA8003_05.
5
Ethical issues in psychological assessment in school settings.学校环境中心理评估中的伦理问题。
J Pers Assess. 2001 Oct;77(2):231-41. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7702_06.
6
The utility of projective techniques and the function of the clinical psychologist.投射技术的效用与临床心理学家的职能。
Ment Hyg. 1969 Oct;53(4):654-6.
7
The future of psychodiagnosis revisited.再探心理诊断的未来。
J Pers Assess. 1983 Oct;47(5):451-61. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa4705_1.
8
Clinical psychologists across the years: the division of clinical psychology from 1960 to 2003.多年来的临床心理学家:1960年至2003年临床心理学的划分
J Clin Psychol. 2005 Dec;61(12):1467-83. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20135.
9
Projective techniques: an international perspective.投射技术:国际视角
Psychol Rep. 1993 Feb;72(1):179-82. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1993.72.1.179.
10
Blind test interpretation to overcome student resistance to projective techniques courses.
J Pers Assess. 1973 Jun;37(3):213-6. doi: 10.1080/00223891.1973.10119854.