• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

3D 腹腔镜无夹闭单纯剜除术是否可为临床 T1 期肾肿瘤的一种可行选择?单中心经验的结果。

Is 3D laparoscopic off clamp simple enucleation a feasible alternative for clinical T1 renal tumors? Outcomes from a single center experience.

机构信息

1Department of Urology, Clinical City Hospital Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

J BUON. 2021 May-Jun;26(3):1088-1093.

PMID:34268976
Abstract

PURPOSE

To evaluate the safety of 3D laparoscopic off clamp simple enucleation (SE) of kidney tumors versus standard laparoscopic on-clamp partial nephrectomy (PN) in terms of perioperative, oncological and functional outcomes.

METHODS

All patients that underwent 3D laparoscopic nephron sparing surgery (NSS) in our department for clinical T1 tumors between January 2019-September 2020 were included. Of the total of 84 patients, 38 (45.24%) underwent SE (SE group) and 46 (54.76%) PN (PN group). Perioperative data was collected and analyzed. Oncological outcomes were evaluated by the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate and follow-up at 6 months after surgery.

RESULTS

Mean age, gender, tumor size, PADUA score and length of hospital stay were comparable between the two groups. Estimated intraoperative blood loss (284.21 ml vs 151.52 ml, p=0.0001) and hemoglobin drop (p=0.0001) were significantly lower for the PN group. Patients that underwent SE showed a better preservation of renal function (eGFR drop of 4.4 ml/min vs 1.78 ml/min, p=0.75). No significant differences were found regarding the PSM, although the PSM rate was lower in the SE group when compared with the PN group (2.63% vs 4.34%, p= 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Off-clamp simple enucleation of renal masses is feasible by laparoscopic approach and has produced comparable oncologic outcomes with standard on-clamp partial nephrectomy, with an incremental advantage for the preservation of renal function.

摘要

目的

评估 3D 腹腔镜无夹闭肾肿瘤单纯剜除术(SE)与标准腹腔镜夹闭部分肾切除术(PN)在围手术期、肿瘤学和功能结果方面的安全性。

方法

纳入 2019 年 1 月至 2020 年 9 月期间在我科行 3D 腹腔镜肾部分切除术(NSS)治疗临床 T1 肿瘤的所有患者。在总共 84 例患者中,38 例(45.24%)接受 SE(SE 组),46 例(54.76%)接受 PN(PN 组)。收集并分析围手术期数据。通过术后 6 个月的阳性切缘(PSM)率和随访来评估肿瘤学结果。

结果

两组患者的平均年龄、性别、肿瘤大小、PADUA 评分和住院时间无差异。PN 组术中估计失血量(284.21ml 比 151.52ml,p=0.0001)和血红蛋白下降量(p=0.0001)明显低于 SE 组。SE 组患者的肾功能保存更好(eGFR 下降 4.4ml/min 比 1.78ml/min,p=0.75)。PSM 无显著差异,但 SE 组的 PSM 率低于 PN 组(2.63%比 4.34%,p=0.07)。

结论

腹腔镜无夹闭单纯剜除肾肿瘤是可行的,其肿瘤学结果与标准夹闭部分肾切除术相当,在保留肾功能方面具有优势。

相似文献

1
Is 3D laparoscopic off clamp simple enucleation a feasible alternative for clinical T1 renal tumors? Outcomes from a single center experience.3D 腹腔镜无夹闭单纯剜除术是否可为临床 T1 期肾肿瘤的一种可行选择?单中心经验的结果。
J BUON. 2021 May-Jun;26(3):1088-1093.
2
Simple enucleation versus standard partial nephrectomy for clinical T1 renal masses: perioperative outcomes based on a matched-pair comparison of 396 patients (RECORd project).单纯剜除术与标准部分肾切除术治疗临床 T1 期肾肿瘤:基于 396 例患者配对比较的围手术期结果(RECORd 项目)。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2014 Jun;40(6):762-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.01.007. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
3
Comparing Zero Ischemia Laparoscopic Radio Frequency Ablation Assisted Tumor Enucleation and Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Clinical T1a Renal Tumor: A Randomized Clinical Trial.比较零缺血腹腔镜射频消融辅助肿瘤剜除术与腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗 T1a 期肾癌:一项随机临床试验。
J Urol. 2016 Jun;195(6):1677-83. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.115. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
4
Nephrometry score-guided off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: patient selection and short-time functional results.肾计量评分引导下的无阻断腹腔镜肾部分切除术:患者选择及短期功能结果
World J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun 21;14(1):163. doi: 10.1186/s12957-016-0914-5.
5
Simple enucleation for the treatment of highly complex renal tumors: Perioperative, functional and oncological results.单纯剜除术治疗高度复杂肾肿瘤:围手术期、功能及肿瘤学结果
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jul;41(7):934-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2015.02.019. Epub 2015 Apr 24.
6
Impact of the off-clamp endoscopic robot-assisted simple enucleation (ERASE) of clinical T1 renal tumors on the postoperative renal function: Results from a matched-pair comparison.无夹闭内镜机器人辅助单纯剜除术(ERASE)治疗临床 T1 期肾肿瘤对术后肾功能的影响:一项配对比较研究结果。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018 Jun;44(6):853-858. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2018.01.093. Epub 2018 Feb 13.
7
Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Laparoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation and Partial Nephrectomy for T1a Renal Masses: A Retrospective Single-center 60 Month Follow-up Cohort Study.腹腔镜射频消融术与部分肾切除术治疗T1a期肾肿瘤的肿瘤学及功能学结局:一项单中心回顾性60个月随访队列研究
Urol J. 2019 Feb 21;16(1):44-49. doi: 10.22037/uj.v0i0.4155.
8
Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for recurrent renal-cell carcinoma in patients previously treated with nephron-sparing surgery.机器人辅助腹腔镜肾部分切除术治疗既往接受保肾手术治疗的复发性肾细胞癌。
J Endourol. 2013 Mar;27(3):309-12. doi: 10.1089/end.2012.0184. Epub 2012 Nov 12.
9
Comparison of Partial and Radical Laparascopic Nephrectomy: Perioperative and Oncologic Outcomes for Clinical T2 Renal Cell Carcinoma.部分腹腔镜肾切除术与根治性腹腔镜肾切除术的比较:T2 期肾癌的围手术期和肿瘤学结果。
J Endourol. 2018 Oct;32(10):950-954. doi: 10.1089/end.2018.0199. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
10
Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients.200例肾肿瘤患者腹腔镜与开放性部分肾切除术的对比分析
J Urol. 2003 Jul;170(1):64-8. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000072272.02322.ff.

引用本文的文献

1
Tumor enucleation for the treatment of T1 renal tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis.肿瘤剜除术治疗 T1 期肾肿瘤:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Investig Clin Urol. 2022 Mar;63(2):126-139. doi: 10.4111/icu.20210361.