• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Evaluation of competency to stand trial in defendants who do not want to be defended against the crimes charged.

作者信息

Miller R D, Germain E J

机构信息

Forensic Assessment Unit, Mendota Mental Health Institute Forensic Center, Madison, WI 53704.

出版信息

Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1987;15(4):371-9.

PMID:3427239
Abstract

Implicit but significant assumptions made in the criminal justice system include beliefs that criminals do not commit crimes to be tried and convicted and that, once arrested, defendants' primary motives are to avoid or minimize the legal consequences of the charges they face. When those assumptions are not correct, clinicians and legal decision makers are faced with difficult tasks. The authors present three cases of defendants who were not primarily concerned with defending themselves against the charges they faced, but rather with using the criminal justice procedures to further personal goals, and discuss the problems involved for forensic evaluators and courts.

摘要

相似文献

1
Evaluation of competency to stand trial in defendants who do not want to be defended against the crimes charged.
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1987;15(4):371-9.
2
The competency of criminal defendants to refuse, for delusional reasons, a viable insanity defense recommended by counsel.刑事被告出于妄想的原因拒绝律师建议的可行的精神错乱抗辩的能力。
Behav Sci Law. 2003;21(2):135-56. doi: 10.1002/bsl.527.
3
"A fool for a client": print portrayals of 49 pro se criminal defendants.“为当事人充当傻瓜”:49名自行辩护的刑事被告形象刻画
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2001;29(4):408-19.
4
[Investigation of verdicts in lawsuits involving competency to stand trial].[涉及受审能力的诉讼裁决调查]
Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi. 2006;108(11):1128-41.
5
Competency, civil commitment, and the dangerousness of the mentally ill.
J Forensic Sci. 1993 Nov;38(6):1460-6.
6
The insanity defense: effects of abolition unsupported by a moral consensus.精神错乱辩护:废除该辩护的影响未得到道德共识的支持。
Am J Law Med. 1984 Winter;9(4):471-500.
7
AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.美国精神病学与法律学会关于提出精神错乱抗辩的被告的法医精神病学评估实践指南。美国精神病学与法律学会。
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 2002;30(2 Suppl):S3-40.
8
Defendants pleading insanity: an analysis of outcome.以精神错乱为由进行抗辩的被告:结果分析。
Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law. 1989;17(2):203-11.
9
Insane defendants and forensic convicts: before and after the onset of the new forensic psychiatry network and the criminal justice system reform in Chile.疯狂的被告和法医罪犯:在智利新法医精神病学网络和刑事司法系统改革之前和之后。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2010 Sep;23(5):458-62. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0b013e32833bb31a.
10
Factors that predict murder defendants' competence to stand trial.预测谋杀案被告受审能力的因素。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2018 Jul-Aug;59:31-37. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2018.05.009. Epub 2018 Jun 8.