• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

去甲肾上腺素在肝肾综合征 - 急性肾损伤患者中比米多君/奥曲肽更有效:一项随机对照试验

Norepinephrine is More Effective Than Midodrine/Octreotide in Patients With Hepatorenal Syndrome-Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

El-Desoki Mahmoud Eman Ibrahim, Abdelaziz Doaa H, Abd-Elsalam Sherief, Mansour Noha O

机构信息

Intensive Care Medicine, National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt.

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, The National Hepatology and Tropical Medicine Research Institute, Cairo, Egypt.

出版信息

Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jul 2;12:675948. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.675948. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fphar.2021.675948
PMID:34276366
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8283260/
Abstract

Terlipressin is the first-line pharmacological treatment for hepatorenal syndrome. When terlipressin is unavailable, midodrine/octreotide or norepinephrine, with albumin, represent the alternative treatments. The comparative efficacy of these alternative regimens remains unclear. To compare the efficacy of midodrine/octreotide to that of norepinephrine for the treatment of patients with hepatorenal syndrome. In the intensive care setting, sixty patients with hepatorenal syndrome were randomized to initially receive either 0.5 mg/h of norepinephrine (maximum 3 mg/h) or 5 mg of oral midodrine three times/day (maximum 12.5 mg three times/day) plus octreotide (100 μg/6 h) as subcutaneous injection (maximum 200 μg/6 h), together with albumin (20-40 g/day). Treatment was allowed for a maximum of 10 days. Survival was analyzed for up to 30 days. The primary efficacy outcome was the proportion of patients who achieved full response, defined as the return of serum creatinine to a value within 0.3 mg/dl of the baseline at the end of treatment. There was a significantly higher rate of full response in the norepinephrine group (15/26, 57.60%) than the midodrine/octreotide group (5/25, 20%) ( = 0.006). Eleven (42.30%) patients in the norepinephrine group and 6 (24%) in the midodrine/octreotide group survived ( = 0.166). Norepinephrine plus albumin is significantly more effective than midodrine and octreotide plus albumin in improving renal function in patients with hepatorenal syndrome. (ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT03455322). https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03455322?cond = Hepatorenal+Syndrome&cntry = EG&draw = 2&rank = 1.

摘要

特利加压素是肝肾综合征的一线药物治疗。当无法获得特利加压素时,米多君/奥曲肽或去甲肾上腺素联合白蛋白可作为替代治疗。这些替代方案的相对疗效仍不明确。为比较米多君/奥曲肽与去甲肾上腺素治疗肝肾综合征患者的疗效。在重症监护环境中,60例肝肾综合征患者被随机分组,初始分别接受0.5mg/h的去甲肾上腺素(最大剂量3mg/h)或每日3次口服5mg米多君(最大剂量每日3次12.5mg)加奥曲肽(100μg/6小时)皮下注射(最大剂量200μg/6小时),同时给予白蛋白(20 - 40g/天)。治疗最长持续10天。分析30天内的生存率。主要疗效指标是达到完全缓解的患者比例,完全缓解定义为治疗结束时血清肌酐恢复到基线值±0.3mg/dl范围内。去甲肾上腺素组的完全缓解率(15/26,57.60%)显著高于米多君/奥曲肽组(5/25,20%)(P = 0.006)。去甲肾上腺素组有11例(42.30%)患者存活,米多君/奥曲肽组有6例(24%)患者存活(P = 0.166)。去甲肾上腺素联合白蛋白在改善肝肾综合征患者肾功能方面显著优于米多君和奥曲肽联合白蛋白。(ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03455322)。https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03455322?cond = Hepatorenal+Syndrome&cntry = EG&draw = 2&rank = 1

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e0e/8283260/b18d6c353a8a/fphar-12-675948-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e0e/8283260/d9f46972107c/fphar-12-675948-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e0e/8283260/b18d6c353a8a/fphar-12-675948-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e0e/8283260/d9f46972107c/fphar-12-675948-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1e0e/8283260/b18d6c353a8a/fphar-12-675948-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Norepinephrine is More Effective Than Midodrine/Octreotide in Patients With Hepatorenal Syndrome-Acute Kidney Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial.去甲肾上腺素在肝肾综合征 - 急性肾损伤患者中比米多君/奥曲肽更有效:一项随机对照试验
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Jul 2;12:675948. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.675948. eCollection 2021.
2
Cost-effectiveness of terlipressin for hepatorenal syndrome: the United States hospital perspective.特利加压素治疗肝肾综合征的成本效益:美国医院视角。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):1342-1348. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2260693. Epub 2023 Nov 14.
3
Terlipressin plus albumin versus midodrine and octreotide plus albumin in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: A randomized trial.特利加压素联合白蛋白与米多君和奥曲肽联合白蛋白治疗肝肾综合征:一项随机试验。
Hepatology. 2015 Aug;62(2):567-74. doi: 10.1002/hep.27709. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
4
AGA Clinical Practice Update on the Evaluation and Management of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients With Cirrhosis: Expert Review.AGA 临床实践更新:肝硬化患者急性肾损伤的评估和管理:专家综述。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Dec;20(12):2707-2716. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2022.08.033. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
5
Comparative efficacy of pharmacological strategies for management of type 1 hepatorenal syndrome: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较药物策略治疗 1 型肝肾综合征的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017 Feb;2(2):94-102. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(16)30157-1. Epub 2016 Dec 2.
6
Terlipressin versus other vasoactive drugs for hepatorenal syndrome.特利加压素与其他血管活性药物治疗肝肾综合征的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 27;9(9):CD011532. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011532.pub2.
7
Terlipressin vs Midodrine Plus Octreotide for Hepatorenal Syndrome-Acute Kidney Injury: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison.特利加压素与米多君加奥曲肽治疗肝肾综合征-急性肾损伤:倾向评分匹配比较。
Clin Transl Gastroenterol. 2023 Dec 1;14(12):e00627. doi: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000627.
8
Treatment-Related Cost Analysis of Terlipressin for Adults with Hepatorenal Syndrome with Rapid Reduction in Kidney Function.特利加压素治疗肾功能快速下降的肝肾综合征成人患者的相关治疗费用分析。
Adv Ther. 2023 Dec;40(12):5432-5446. doi: 10.1007/s12325-023-02674-z. Epub 2023 Oct 9.
9
Midodrine, octreotide, albumin, and TIPS in selected patients with cirrhosis and type 1 hepatorenal syndrome.米多君、奥曲肽、白蛋白及经颈静脉肝内门体分流术用于特定肝硬化合并1型肝肾综合征患者
Hepatology. 2004 Jul;40(1):55-64. doi: 10.1002/hep.20262.
10
Pharmacological Therapies for Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肝肾综合征的药物治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;52(4):360-367. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000913.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Mortality Rates of Vasoconstrictor Agents in the Management of Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管收缩剂治疗肝肾综合征的比较死亡率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Cureus. 2024 Aug 16;16(8):e67034. doi: 10.7759/cureus.67034. eCollection 2024 Aug.
2
Vasoconstrictor Therapy for Acute Kidney Injury Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Studies.血管收缩剂治疗急性肾损伤肝肾综合征:随机研究的荟萃分析
Gastro Hep Adv. 2023 Jan 18;2(4):455-464. doi: 10.1016/j.gastha.2023.01.007. eCollection 2023.
3
Management of hepatorenal syndrome and associated outcomes: a systematic reviews.

本文引用的文献

1
Terlipressin plus Albumin for the Treatment of Type 1 Hepatorenal Syndrome.特利加压素联合白蛋白治疗 1 型肝肾综合征。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 4;384(9):818-828. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2008290.
2
A Randomized Trial of Albumin Infusions in Hospitalized Patients with Cirrhosis.肝硬化住院患者白蛋白输注随机试验。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Mar 4;384(9):808-817. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2022166.
3
Terlipressin for the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: an overview of current evidence.特利加压素治疗肝肾综合征:当前证据概述。
肝肾综合征及其相关结局的管理:系统评价。
BMJ Open Gastroenterol. 2024 Apr 17;11(1):e001319. doi: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001319.
4
Acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis: Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) and International Club of Ascites (ICA) joint multidisciplinary consensus meeting.肝硬化患者的急性肾损伤:急性疾病质量倡议 (ADQI) 和国际腹水俱乐部 (ICA) 联合多学科共识会议。
J Hepatol. 2024 Jul;81(1):163-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.03.031. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
5
Outcomes among patients with hepatorenal syndrome based on hospital teaching and transplant status: Analysis of 159 845 hospitalizations.基于医院教学和移植状态的肝肾综合征患者的结局:对159845例住院病例的分析
JGH Open. 2023 Nov 27;7(12):848-854. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.12985. eCollection 2023 Dec.
6
A Systematic Review of the Emerging Treatment for Hepatorenal Syndrome With a Principal Focus on Terlipressin: A Recent FDA-Approved Drug.以特利加压素为主要关注点的肝肾综合征新兴治疗方法的系统评价:一种近期获美国食品药品监督管理局批准的药物
Cureus. 2023 Jul 24;15(7):e42367. doi: 10.7759/cureus.42367. eCollection 2023 Jul.
7
Acute Kidney Injury in Liver Cirrhosis.肝硬化中的急性肾损伤
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jul 13;13(14):2361. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13142361.
8
Management of hepatorenal syndrome in liver cirrhosis: a recent update.肝硬化患者肝肾综合征的管理:最新进展
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2022 Jun 14;15:17562848221102679. doi: 10.1177/17562848221102679. eCollection 2022.
Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 May;35(5):859-868. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1552575. Epub 2019 Jan 4.
4
Terlipressin Is Superior to Noradrenaline in the Management of Acute Kidney Injury in Acute on Chronic Liver Failure.特利加压素在慢性肝衰竭急性加重期急性肾损伤管理中优于去甲肾上腺素。
Hepatology. 2020 Feb;71(2):600-610. doi: 10.1002/hep.30208. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
5
Terlipressin in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.特利加压素治疗肝肾综合征:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Apr;97(16):e0431. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010431.
6
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis.欧洲肝脏研究学会失代偿期肝硬化患者管理临床实践指南
J Hepatol. 2018 Aug;69(2):406-460. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
7
Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt for hepatorenal syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经颈静脉肝内门体分流术治疗肝肾综合征:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dig Liver Dis. 2018 Apr;50(4):323-330. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2018.01.123. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
8
Pharmacological Therapies for Hepatorenal Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.肝肾综合征的药物治疗:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018 Apr;52(4):360-367. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000913.
9
Terlipressin versus other vasoactive drugs for hepatorenal syndrome.特利加压素与其他血管活性药物治疗肝肾综合征的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 27;9(9):CD011532. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011532.pub2.
10
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Terlipressin and Albumin with a Combination of Concurrent Dopamine, Furosemide, and Albumin in Hepatorenal Syndrome.比较特利加压素与白蛋白联合多巴胺、呋塞米和白蛋白治疗肝肾综合征疗效的随机对照试验
J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2015 Dec;5(4):276-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Sep 1.