Perlman Barry E, Minis Evelyn, Greenberg Patricia, Krishnamoorthy Kavitha, Morelli Sara S, Jindal Sangita K, McGovern Peter G
Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Health, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey.
Department of Biostatistics & Epidemiology, Rutgers School of Public Health, New Brunswick School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey.
F S Rep. 2021 Feb 26;2(2):161-165. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.02.008. eCollection 2021 Jun.
To investigate whether there is a difference in live-birth gender rates in blastocyst-stage frozen-thawed embryo transfers (FETs) compared with those in cleavage-stage FETs.
Retrospective cohort study.
Academic medical center.
All women with recorded live births who underwent FET at either the blastocyst or cleavage stage, reported to the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology during 2004-2013.
None.
The primary outcome was live-birth gender rates. Demographic criteria were also collected. The chi-square analyses were used for bivariate associations, and multiple logistic regression models were used for adjusted associations, with all two-sided <.05 considered statistically significant.
A statistically significant increase was noted in the number of live male births after blastocyst-stage FET compared with that after cleavage-stage FET (51.9% vs. 50.5%). After controlling for potential confounders including age (odds ratio [OR], 1.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03, 1.08), body mass index (OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.04, 1.12), and male factor infertility (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.03, 1.08), the increase in male live births after blastocyst-stage FET remained statistically significant.
In patients undergoing FETs, blastocyst-stage transfers are associated with higher male gender live-birth rates compared with cleavage-stage transfers.
探讨囊胚期冻融胚胎移植(FET)与卵裂期FET相比,活产性别比率是否存在差异。
回顾性队列研究。
学术医疗中心。
2004年至2013年期间向辅助生殖技术协会报告的所有在囊胚期或卵裂期接受FET并记录有活产情况的女性。
无。
主要观察指标为活产性别比率。还收集了人口统计学标准。采用卡方分析进行双变量关联分析,采用多元逻辑回归模型进行校正关联分析,所有双侧P<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
与卵裂期FET后相比,囊胚期FET后活产男婴数量有统计学意义的增加(51.9%对50.5%)。在控制了包括年龄(优势比[OR],1.06;95%置信区间[CI],1.03,1.08)、体重指数(OR,1.08;95%CI,1.04,1.12)和男性因素不孕症(OR,1.06;95%CI,1.03,1.08)等潜在混杂因素后,囊胚期FET后活产男婴数量的增加仍具有统计学意义。
在接受FET的患者中,与卵裂期移植相比,囊胚期移植与更高的男性活产率相关。