• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于模糊层次分析法(FAHP)和耦合修正的大型商业和高层建筑新型火灾风险评估方法

A Novel Fire Risk Assessment Approach for Large-Scale Commercial and High-Rise Buildings Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Coupling Revision.

机构信息

University of Michigan-Shanghai Jiao Tong University Joint Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.

Department of Automation, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 5;18(13):7187. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137187.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18137187
PMID:34281124
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8297316/
Abstract

In recent years, much more emphasis than before has been placed on fire safety regulations by the local and central authorities of China, which makes fire risk assessments more important. In this paper we propose a new fire risk assessment approach for large-scale commercial and high-rise buildings that aims to evaluate the performances of their fire safety systems; this should improve the fire risk management and public safety in those buildings. According to the features of large-scale commercial and high-rise buildings, a fire-risk indexing system was built, and based on it we established a scientific fire risk evaluation system. To this end, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) was used to assign a reasonable weight to each fire risk factor in the evaluation system. In addition, we revised the original scores by analyzing the coupling relationships among the fire risk factors. To validate our system, we selected 11 buildings in Shandong province and collected their fire safety data. Then, we calculated the final scores for the fire safety management of those buildings, and the results show that: (1) our fire risk evaluation system can assign reasonable weights; (2) the proposed evaluation system is comprehensive and has strong interpretability, since it exploits the coupling relationships among the risk factors. The novelty of the proposed approach lies in that it integrates opinions from multiple experts and utilizes coupling relationships among the factors. Further, the feedback from the approach can find not only the weaknesses in fire risk management, but also the potential causes of fires. As a result, the feedback from our assessment can assist the safety chiefs and inspectors with improving fire risk management.

摘要

近年来,中国地方和中央当局比以往更加重视消防安全法规,这使得火灾风险评估变得更为重要。本文提出了一种新的大型商业和高层建筑火灾风险评估方法,旨在评估其消防安全系统的性能;这将提高这些建筑物的火灾风险管理和公共安全水平。根据大型商业和高层建筑的特点,建立了火灾风险指标体系,并在此基础上建立了科学的火灾风险评价体系。为此,采用模糊层次分析法(FAHP)为评价体系中的每个火灾风险因素赋予合理的权重。此外,我们通过分析火灾风险因素之间的耦合关系对原始得分进行了修正。为了验证我们的系统,我们选择了山东省的 11 座建筑,并收集了它们的消防安全数据。然后,我们计算了这些建筑消防安全管理的最终得分,结果表明:(1)我们的火灾风险评估系统能够分配合理的权重;(2)所提出的评估系统全面且具有很强的可解释性,因为它利用了风险因素之间的耦合关系。该方法的新颖之处在于它集成了多个专家的意见,并利用了因素之间的耦合关系。此外,该方法的反馈不仅可以发现火灾风险管理的薄弱环节,还可以发现火灾的潜在原因。因此,我们的评估反馈可以帮助安全主管和检查员改进火灾风险管理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/4ec329911b40/ijerph-18-07187-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/b72f31ab0ba4/ijerph-18-07187-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/0d5c166dbfed/ijerph-18-07187-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/bf0ef59dd875/ijerph-18-07187-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/5fdbcad1be9f/ijerph-18-07187-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/f63e4e93bfcf/ijerph-18-07187-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/604fd4780c3d/ijerph-18-07187-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/cfffb13dd616/ijerph-18-07187-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/d82f1eecd2fe/ijerph-18-07187-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/8dbb2f33900e/ijerph-18-07187-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/acd1c521fb0e/ijerph-18-07187-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/4ec329911b40/ijerph-18-07187-g011.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/b72f31ab0ba4/ijerph-18-07187-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/0d5c166dbfed/ijerph-18-07187-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/bf0ef59dd875/ijerph-18-07187-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/5fdbcad1be9f/ijerph-18-07187-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/f63e4e93bfcf/ijerph-18-07187-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/604fd4780c3d/ijerph-18-07187-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/cfffb13dd616/ijerph-18-07187-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/d82f1eecd2fe/ijerph-18-07187-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/8dbb2f33900e/ijerph-18-07187-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/acd1c521fb0e/ijerph-18-07187-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/129e/8297316/4ec329911b40/ijerph-18-07187-g011.jpg

相似文献

1
A Novel Fire Risk Assessment Approach for Large-Scale Commercial and High-Rise Buildings Based on Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and Coupling Revision.基于模糊层次分析法(FAHP)和耦合修正的大型商业和高层建筑新型火灾风险评估方法
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 5;18(13):7187. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18137187.
2
A Comprehensive Investigation on the Fire Hazards and Environmental Risks in a Commercial Complex Based on Fault Tree Analysis and the Analytic Hierarchy Process.基于故障树分析和层次分析法的商业综合体火灾隐患及环境风险综合研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 8;17(19):7347. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17197347.
3
Fire risk assessment of high-rise buildings under construction based on unascertained measure theory.基于未确知测度理论的高层建筑施工火灾风险评估
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 14;15(9):e0239166. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239166. eCollection 2020.
4
The development and realisation of a multi-faceted system for green building planning: A case in Ningbo using the fuzzy analytical hierarchy process.绿色建筑规划多维度系统的开发与实现:以宁波为例的模糊层次分析法应用
Energy Build. 2020 Nov 1;226:110371. doi: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110371. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
5
2019 Writing Contest Post-graduate Winner: Fire Safety Behaviors Among Residential High-Rise Building Occupants in Hawai'i: A Qualitative Study.2019 年写作大赛研究生组获奖者:夏威夷高层住宅居民的消防安全行为:一项定性研究。
Hawaii J Health Soc Welf. 2020 Aug 1;79(8):249-255.
6
Fire Risk Assessments of Informal Settlements Based on Fire Risk Index and Bayesian Network.基于火灾风险指数和贝叶斯网络的非正规住区火灾风险评估
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 25;19(23):15689. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192315689.
7
Strategies for controlling violence against health care workers: Application of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process and fuzzy additive ratio assessment.控制针对医护人员暴力行为的策略:模糊层次分析法和模糊加法比评估的应用。
J Nurs Manag. 2020 May;28(4):777-786. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12989.
8
Bimodal fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (BFAHP) for coronary heart disease risk assessment.双模态模糊层次分析法(BFAHP)在冠心病风险评估中的应用。
J Biomed Inform. 2018 Jul;83:204-216. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2018.03.016. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
9
An Integrated Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) Model for Studying Significant Factors Associated with Frequent Lane Changing.一种用于研究与频繁变道相关的重要因素的集成模糊层次分析法(AHP)模型。
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Mar 4;24(3):367. doi: 10.3390/e24030367.
10
Multi-Risk Assessment of Mine Lithium Battery Fire Based on Quantitative Factor Characterization.基于定量因素特征化的矿山锂电池火灾多风险评估。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 27;20(1):456. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010456.

引用本文的文献

1
Analysis of the fire risks and mitigation approaches in the apparel manufacturing industry: Implications toward operational safety and sustainability.服装制造业火灾风险分析与缓解措施:对运营安全与可持续性的启示
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 20;9(9):e20312. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20312. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Determination of agricultural land suitability with a multiple-criteria decision-making method in Northwestern Turkey.土耳其西北部基于多准则决策方法的农业用地适宜性测定
Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran). 2021;18(5):1073-1088. doi: 10.1007/s13762-020-02869-9. Epub 2020 Aug 6.
2
Risk Assessment of High-Speed Rail Projects: A Risk Coupling Model Based on System Dynamics.高铁项目风险评估:基于系统动力学的风险耦合模型。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jul 23;17(15):5307. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17155307.
3
Risk assessment of mega-city infrastructures related to land subsidence using improved trapezoidal FAHP.
利用改进的梯形 FAHP 评估与地面沉降相关的特大城市基础设施的风险。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 May 15;717:135310. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135310. Epub 2019 Nov 25.
4
Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends.多准则决策分析在环境科学中的应用及发展趋势:十年回顾。
Sci Total Environ. 2011 Sep 1;409(19):3578-94. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.06.022. Epub 2011 Jul 18.