Hoyer Heike, Mehlhorn Grit, Scheungraber Cornelia, Hagemann Ingke, Hirchenhain Christine, Woelber Linn, Stolte Claudia, Hampl Monika, Scherbring Sarah, Denecke Agnieszka, Bartels Janina, Ebert Andreas D, Meneder Sabina, Petzold Annett, Heller Tabitha, Heidtke Karsten R, Schwarz Elisabeth, Stübs Frederik, Schütze Stefanie, Stange Eva-Lena, Jaeger Anna, Martignoni Franca, Dellmann Ansgar, Rody Achim, Hillemanns Peter, Fehm Tanja, Petry Karl-Ulrich, Böhmer Gerd, Schmalfeldt Barbara, Wimberger Pauline, Beckmann Matthias W, Runnebaum Ingo B, Dürst Matthias
Institut für Medizinische Statistik, Informatik und Datenwissenschaften, Universitätsklinikum Jena, 07743 Jena, Germany.
Frauenklinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, 91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jul 1;13(13):3309. doi: 10.3390/cancers13133309.
Post-treatment follow-up in women with cervical pre-cancers (CIN3) is mandatory due to relapse in up to 10% of patients. Standard follow-up based on hrHPV-DNA/cytology co-testing has high sensitivity but limited specificity. The aim of our prospective, multicenter, observational study was to test the hypothesis that an individualized viral-cellular-junction test (vcj-PCR) combined with cytology has a lower false positive rate for the prediction of recurrence compared to standard co-testing.
Pre-surgical cervical swabs served for the identification of HPV16/18 DNA integration sites by next-generation-sequencing (NGS). Samples taken at 6, 12 and 24 months post-surgery were evaluated by cytology, hrHPV-DNA and the patients' individual HPV-integration sites (vcj-PCR on the basis of NGS).
Integration sites were detected in 48 of 445 patients (10.8%), 39 of them had valid follow-up data. The false positive rate was 18.2% (95% CI 8.6-34.4%) for standard hrHPV/cytology at six months compared to 12.1% (95% CI 4.8-27.3%) for vcj-PCR/cytology, respectively (McNemar = 0.50). Six patients developed recurrences (1 CIN2, 5 CIN3) during follow-up. Standard co-testing detected all, whereas vcj-PCR/cytology detected only five patients with recurrences. Data of 269 patients without evidence of HPV16/18 integration were subject to post-hoc analyses. Standard co-testing revealed a false positive rate of 15.7% (95% CI 11.7-20.7%) and predicted ten of fourteen recurrences at six months.
Although highly specific on its own vcj-PCR could not detect all recurrent CIN2/3. Possible reasons for this unexpected result may be multifocal lesions, intratumoral heterogeneity with respect to HPV integration and/or incident CIN.
由于高达10%的宫颈癌前病变(CIN3)患者会复发,因此对这些女性进行治疗后随访是必要的。基于高危型人乳头瘤病毒(hrHPV)-DNA/细胞学联合检测的标准随访具有较高的敏感性,但特异性有限。我们这项前瞻性、多中心、观察性研究的目的是检验以下假设:与标准联合检测相比,个体化的病毒-细胞连接检测(vcj-PCR)联合细胞学检查在预测复发方面具有更低的假阳性率。
术前宫颈拭子用于通过下一代测序(NGS)鉴定HPV16/18 DNA整合位点。术后6、12和24个月采集的样本通过细胞学、hrHPV-DNA以及患者个体的HPV整合位点(基于NGS的vcj-PCR)进行评估。
445例患者中有48例(10.8%)检测到整合位点,其中39例有有效的随访数据。六个月时,标准hrHPV/细胞学检查的假阳性率为18.2%(95%可信区间8.6 - 34.4%),而vcj-PCR/细胞学检查的假阳性率分别为12.1%(95%可信区间4.8 - 27.3%)(麦克尼马尔检验 = 0.50)。随访期间有6例患者复发(1例CIN2,5例CIN3)。标准联合检测检测到了所有复发患者,而vcj-PCR/细胞学检查仅检测到5例复发患者。对269例无HPV16/18整合证据的患者数据进行了事后分析。标准联合检测显示假阳性率为15.7%(95%可信区间11.7 - 20.7%),并在六个月时预测了14例复发中的10例。
尽管vcj-PCR本身具有高度特异性,但它不能检测到所有复发性CIN2/3。这一意外结果的可能原因可能是多灶性病变、HPV整合方面的肿瘤内异质性和/或偶发性CIN。