• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Administration and Evaluation of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Curriculum Quality Surveys in Pharmacy Schools.药剂学学校中美国药学院协会课程质量调查的管理和评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Mar;85(3):8045. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8045. Epub 2020 Nov 24.
2
Moving AACP Curriculum Quality Survey Results from Good to Great.推动 AACP 课程质量调查结果从良好走向卓越。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(3):ajpe9004. doi: 10.5688/ajpe9004. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
3
The Status and Adequacy of Preceptor Orientation and Development Programs in US Pharmacy Schools.美国药学院校导师指导方向和发展项目的现状和充分性。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Feb;84(2):7540. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7540.
4
The Current Landscape of College-Sponsored Postgraduate Teaching and Learning Curriculum Programs.高校研究生教学课程项目的现状。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Jul;84(7):ajpe7803. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7803.
5
Teaching evaluation practices in colleges and schools of pharmacy.药学院校的教学评估实践。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Oct 1;73(6):103. doi: 10.5688/aj7306103.
6
An Updated National Profile of Curriculum Committees at US Schools and Colleges of Pharmacy.美国药学院校课程委员会的最新国家概况。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Oct;86(7):8745. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8745. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
7
Envisioning the Future of Student Success: Report of the 2022-2023 AACP Student Affairs Standing Committee.展望学生成功的未来:2022-2023 年 AACP 学生事务常务委员会报告。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Aug;87(8):100559. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpe.2023.100559. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
8
Immunization Education in US Pharmacy Colleges and Schools.美国药学院校的免疫教育。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Jun;83(5):6765. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6765.
9
Student and School-level Predictors of Pharmacy Residency Attainment.学生和学校层面的因素对药学住院医师实习的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Mar;82(2):6220. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6220.
10
Characterization of Use of the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment Across Accredited Colleges of Pharmacy.药学课程成果评估在认可的药学院校中的使用情况的描述。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Sep;83(7):7091. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7091.

引用本文的文献

1
A Pharmacy Drug Knowledge Assessment Pilot: Who Will Fly Farthest and What Downs the Plane?一项药房药物知识评估试点:谁能飞得最远,什么会使飞机坠毁?
Pharmacy (Basel). 2023 May 13;11(3):85. doi: 10.3390/pharmacy11030085.
2
Moving AACP Curriculum Quality Survey Results from Good to Great.推动 AACP 课程质量调查结果从良好走向卓越。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(3):ajpe9004. doi: 10.5688/ajpe9004. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
3
An Updated National Profile of Curriculum Committees at US Schools and Colleges of Pharmacy.美国药学院校课程委员会的最新国家概况。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Oct;86(7):8745. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8745. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
4
Building a multi-institutional community of practice to foster assessment.构建多机构实践共同体,以促进评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2012 May 10;76(4):58. doi: 10.5688/ajpe76458.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying High-Impact and Managing Low-Impact Assessment Practices.识别高影响力和管理低影响力的评估实践。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Sep;83(7):7496. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7496.
2
Student and School-level Predictors of Pharmacy Residency Attainment.学生和学校层面的因素对药学住院医师实习的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Mar;82(2):6220. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6220.
3
Engaging external senior faculty members as faculty mentors.聘请外部资深教员担任教员导师。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Jun 17;78(5):101. doi: 10.5688/ajpe785101.
4
Best practices for survey research reports revisited: implications of target population, probability sampling, and response rate.再次探讨调查研究报告的最佳实践:目标人群、概率抽样和回复率的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Dec 17;73(8):142. doi: 10.5688/aj7308142.

药剂学学校中美国药学院协会课程质量调查的管理和评估。

Administration and Evaluation of the American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy Curriculum Quality Surveys in Pharmacy Schools.

机构信息

Ferris State University, College of Pharmacy, Grand Rapids, Michigan

Ferris State University, College of Pharmacy, Grand Rapids, Michigan.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Mar;85(3):8045. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8045. Epub 2020 Nov 24.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe8045
PMID:34283765
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8006485/
Abstract

To evaluate how pharmacy programs administer and evaluate American Association of Colleges of Pharmacy (AACP) curriculum quality perception surveys for continuous quality improvement, and to compare usage across the academy to the document. A 27-item survey instrument examining how schools used the curriculum quality survey was created and administered between March and June 2019 to assessment contacts of accredited schools and colleges of pharmacy. Descriptive statistics were performed for each survey item. Of the 140 programs invited to participate, 88 (62.8%) responded. Curriculum quality survey data were triangulated with additional existing data (39.8%) or additional data sources were collected for triangulation with the survey data (54.5%). Programs reported on modifications made in the following areas: curriculum (85.2%), communication (75.0%), student services (68.2%), policy and process (61.4%), and professional development (53.4%). Most programs reported the assessment lead was responsible for oversight of the curriculum quality survey. Of respondents, 66% were familiar with the AACP Principles of Good Use document, and results indicate that institutions are generally following the recommendations. Survey analysis revealed that a significant number of programs are utilizing curriculum quality survey data for making meaningful programmatic improvements. Future work should center on further development of best practices for schools and colleges of pharmacy to effectively use the CQS data for continuous quality improvement.

摘要

为了评估药学专业课程管理和评估美国药学院协会(AACP)课程质量感知调查以实现持续质量改进的情况,并将使用情况与该文件进行比较,我们创建了一个 27 项调查工具,以调查学校如何使用课程质量调查,并于 2019 年 3 月至 6 月向认可学校和药学院的评估联系人进行了调查。对每个调查项目进行了描述性统计。在邀请参与的 140 个项目中,有 88 个(62.8%)做出了回应。课程质量调查数据与其他现有数据(39.8%)进行了三角剖分,或者收集了其他数据源与调查数据进行三角剖分(54.5%)。项目报告了在以下领域进行的修改:课程(85.2%)、沟通(75.0%)、学生服务(68.2%)、政策和流程(61.4%)以及专业发展(53.4%)。大多数项目报告称,评估负责人负责监督课程质量调查。在受访者中,有 66%熟悉 AACP《良好使用原则》文件,结果表明机构通常都在遵循这些建议。调查分析表明,大量项目正在利用课程质量调查数据进行有意义的项目改进。未来的工作应集中在进一步制定学校和药学院的最佳实践,以有效利用 CQS 数据进行持续质量改进。