• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

消除回溯对计算机考试成绩和完成时间的影响。

The Impact of Eliminating Backward Navigation on Computerized Examination Scores and Completion Time.

机构信息

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Dec;84(12):ajpe8034. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8034. Epub 2020 Oct 2.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe8034
PMID:34283787
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7779882/
Abstract

To determine whether elimination of backward navigation during an examination resulted in changes in examination score or time to complete the examination. Student performance on six examinations in which backward navigation was eliminated was compared to performance on examinations administered to pharmacy students the previous year when backwards navigation was allowed. The primary comparison of interest was change in student performance on a subset of identical questions included on both examinations. Secondary outcomes included change in total examination score and completion time. No significant reduction in examination scores was observed as a result of eliminating backward navigation. The average time that students spent on a question was significantly reduced on two of the six examinations. Restricting pharmacy students' ability to revisit questions previously answered (elimination of backward navigation) on an examination had no adverse effect on scores or testing time when assessed across three years of the didactic pharmacy curriculum.

摘要

为了确定在考试过程中是否消除后退导航会导致考试分数或完成考试时间的变化。比较了在考试中消除后退导航时的六次考试中学生的表现,以及前一年在允许后退导航时向药学专业学生进行的考试的表现。主要的比较是在两次考试中都包含的相同问题子集上学生表现的变化。次要结果包括考试总分和完成时间的变化。消除后退导航并没有导致考试成绩显著下降。在六次考试中的两次考试中,学生回答问题的平均时间明显减少。当在三年的药学课程中进行评估时,限制药学专业学生在考试中重新访问先前回答的问题的能力(消除后退导航)对分数或测试时间没有不利影响。

相似文献

1
The Impact of Eliminating Backward Navigation on Computerized Examination Scores and Completion Time.消除回溯对计算机考试成绩和完成时间的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Dec;84(12):ajpe8034. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8034. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
2
A Mixed-Methods Exploration of the Effect of Disabling Backward Navigation on Calculations-Focused Computerized Examinations.一项关于禁用向后导航对以计算为重点的计算机化考试影响的混合方法探索。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Nov;86(9):ajpe8842. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8842. Epub 2021 Dec 10.
3
The Effect of Pharmacy Students' Attendance on Examination Performance in Two Sequential Active-Learning Pharmacotherapy Courses.药学学生出勤率对两门连续主动学习药物治疗课程考试成绩的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Sep;84(9):ajpe7749. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7749.
4
Associating Student Performance in Pharmacy Practice Didactic and Skills-Based Courses With Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.将药学实践理论和技能课程中学生的表现与高级药学实践经验相关联。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2023 Apr;87(3):ajpe8988. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8988. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
5
An electronic NAPLEX review program for longitudinal assessment of pharmacy students' knowledge.一个电子 NAPLEX 复习计划,用于纵向评估药学学生的知识。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Sep 10;74(7):128. doi: 10.5688/aj7407128.
6
Impact of an infectious diseases advanced pharmacy practice experience on student knowledge.传染病高级药学实践经验对学生知识的影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2018 Aug;10(8):1022-1025. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
7
Examination of Factors Relating to Student Performance on the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment.药学课程成果评估中学生表现相关因素的考察。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Mar;83(2):6516. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6516.
8
Predicting Pharmacy Curriculum Outcomes Assessment Performance Using Admissions, Curricular, Demographics, and Preparation Data.利用招生、课程、人口统计学和准备数据预测药学课程成果评估表现。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Dec;83(10):7526. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7526.
9
Effects of a Multicourse, Composite Examination Method on the Performance of PharmD Students in a Basic Pharmacokinetics Course.多课程综合考试方法对药学生基础药代动力学课程表现的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Jun;82(5):6286. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6286.
10
A Modeling Exercise to Identify Predictors of Student Readiness for Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experiences.一项识别学生准备接受高级药学实践经验的预测因素的建模练习。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 May;84(5):7783. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7783.

引用本文的文献

1
A Mixed-Methods Exploration of the Effect of Disabling Backward Navigation on Calculations-Focused Computerized Examinations.一项关于禁用向后导航对以计算为重点的计算机化考试影响的混合方法探索。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2022 Nov;86(9):ajpe8842. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8842. Epub 2021 Dec 10.

本文引用的文献

1
A retrospective analysis of the impact of disabling item review on item performance on computerized fixed-item tests in a doctor of pharmacy program.在药学博士项目的计算机化固定项目测试中,对妨碍项目审查对项目表现的影响进行回顾性分析。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2020 May;12(5):539-543. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2020.01.018. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
2
Best Practices on Examination Construction, Administration, and Feedback.最佳考试设计、管理和反馈实践。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Dec;82(10):7066. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7066.
3
Age is no barrier: predictors of academic success in older learners.年龄不是障碍:老年学习者学业成功的预测因素。
NPJ Sci Learn. 2017 Nov 15;2:13. doi: 10.1038/s41539-017-0014-5. eCollection 2017.
4
Security considerations and recommendations in computer-based testing.基于计算机测试中的安全考量与建议。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:562787. doi: 10.1155/2014/562787. Epub 2014 Sep 1.