• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Best Practices on Examination Construction, Administration, and Feedback.最佳考试设计、管理和反馈实践。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Dec;82(10):7066. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7066.
2
Identifying Best Practices for and Utilities of the Pharmacy Curriculum Outcome Assessment Examination.确定药学课程成果评估考试的最佳实践方法与实用价值。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Dec 25;80(10):163. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8010163.
3
Measuring preadvanced practice experience outcomes as part of a PharmD capstone experience.将预先高级实践经验成果的测量作为药学博士顶点经验的一部分。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Oct 15;78(8):152. doi: 10.5688/ajpe788152.
4
Shared responsibility for the education of pharmacy students.药学专业学生教育的共同责任。
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2018 Feb 15;75(4):223-229. doi: 10.2146/ajhp160708.
5
Pharmacy curriculum outcomes assessment for individual student assessment and curricular evaluation.药学课程成果评估,用于学生个体评估和课程评估。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Dec 15;74(10):183. doi: 10.5688/aj7410183.
6
Peer- and self-grading compared to faculty grading.同伴评价和自我评估与教师评价的比较。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Sep 10;75(7):130. doi: 10.5688/ajpe757130.
7
A course assessment process for curricular quality improvement.课程评估过程促进课程质量提升。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2011 Oct 10;75(8):157. doi: 10.5688/ajpe758157.
8
Incremental development of an integrated assessment method for the professional curriculum.专业课程综合评估方法的逐步发展。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 Aug 12;77(6):122. doi: 10.5688/ajpe776122.
9
Implementation and Assessment of a Novel APPE Intersession Course to Assess Near-Terminal Student Competence.实施和评估新型 APPE 间期课程,以评估近期学生的能力。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Dec;82(10):6460. doi: 10.5688/ajpe6460.
10
A capstone course with a comprehensive and integrated review of the pharmacy curriculum and student assessment as a preparation for advanced pharmacy practice experiences.一门顶点课程,对药学课程和学生评估进行全面综合复习,为高级药学实践经验做准备。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2014 Dec 15;78(10):192. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7810192.

引用本文的文献

1
Development of a Cost-Effective 3D-Printed Airway Suction Simulator for Respiratory Therapy Students.为呼吸治疗专业学生开发一种经济高效的3D打印气道吸引模拟器。
Respir Care. 2024 Apr 22;69(5):549-556. doi: 10.4187/respcare.11277.
2
The Impact of Eliminating Backward Navigation on Computerized Examination Scores and Completion Time.消除回溯对计算机考试成绩和完成时间的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2020 Dec;84(12):ajpe8034. doi: 10.5688/ajpe8034. Epub 2020 Oct 2.
3
Best Practices Related to Examination Item Construction and Post-hoc Review.最佳实践与考试项目构建及事后审查相关。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2019 Sep;83(7):7204. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7204.

本文引用的文献

1
The impact of proctored online exams on the educational experience.监考在线考试对教育体验的影响。
Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2017 Jan-Feb;9(1):108-114. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2016.08.037. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
2
Strategies for Improving Learner Metacognition in Health Professional Education.提高健康职业教育中学习者元认知的策略。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2017 May;81(4):78. doi: 10.5688/ajpe81478.
3
How Question Types Reveal Student Thinking: An Experimental Comparison of Multiple-True-False and Free-Response Formats.问题类型如何揭示学生的思维:多项选择题与简答题格式的实验比较。
CBE Life Sci Educ. 2017 Summer;16(2). doi: 10.1187/cbe.16-12-0339.
4
Motivations and Predictors of Cheating in Pharmacy School.药学院作弊行为的动机与预测因素。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Oct 25;80(8):133. doi: 10.5688/ajpe808133.
5
Academic Dishonesty: Whose Fault is it Anyway?学术不诚实:到底是谁的错?
Am J Pharm Educ. 2016 Apr 25;80(3):35. doi: 10.5688/ajpe80335.
6
Security considerations and recommendations in computer-based testing.基于计算机测试中的安全考量与建议。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:562787. doi: 10.1155/2014/562787. Epub 2014 Sep 1.
7
Impact of adopting a newly developed blueprinting method and relating it to item analysis on students' performance.采用新开发的蓝图方法及其与项目分析相关对学生表现的影响。
Med Teach. 2014 Apr;36 Suppl 1:S55-61. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2014.886014.
8
Effects of question formats on student and item performance.问题格式对学生和项目表现的影响。
Am J Pharm Educ. 2013 May 13;77(4):71. doi: 10.5688/ajpe77471.
9
Promoting academic integrity among health care students.
Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013 May 1;70(9):754-7. doi: 10.2146/ajhp120598.
10
Assessing dental students' competence: best practice recommendations in the performance assessment literature and investigation of current practices in predoctoral dental education.评估牙科学生的能力:绩效评估文献中的最佳实践建议及牙科博士前教育当前实践情况调查
J Dent Educ. 2008 Dec;72(12):1405-35.

最佳考试设计、管理和反馈实践。

Best Practices on Examination Construction, Administration, and Feedback.

机构信息

The University of Iowa College of Pharmacy, Iowa City, Iowa.

Sullivan University College of Pharmacy, Louisville, Kentucky.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2018 Dec;82(10):7066. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7066.

DOI:10.5688/ajpe7066
PMID:30643316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6325455/
Abstract

Examinations are typically used in higher education to objectively assess student learning, and they are also used as a frequent assessment tool in the Doctor of Pharmacy curriculum. This paper describes best practices and provides examples for faculty to build reliable and valid examinations, ensure examination security and deter academic misconduct, and enhance student learning and achievement of course objectives. Colleges and schools of pharmacy can incorporate these concepts into comprehensive examination policies and focus faculty development efforts on improving the examination purpose, design, and experience for both faculty and students.

摘要

考试通常用于高等教育中客观评估学生的学习情况,在药学博士课程中也经常被用作评估工具。本文介绍了最佳实践,并为教师提供了构建可靠有效的考试、确保考试安全和防止学术不端行为以及提高学生学习和课程目标达成的示例。药学院和学校可以将这些概念纳入全面的考试政策中,并将教师发展工作的重点放在提高考试目的、设计和教师与学生的考试体验上。