From the Boston Violence Intervention Advocacy Program, Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2022 Mar 1;92(3):511-519. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003364.
While hospital-based violence intervention programs are primarily designed to aid youth victims of gun violence at high risk for reinjury, the root causes and complex outcomes of community violence are varied. In this study, we examined the risk factors for violent penetrating injury and how the risk of adverse outcomes for survivors differs by injury type (stabbing vs. gunshot wound).
This retrospective study was performed using a cohort of patients presenting to the Boston Medical Center emergency department for a penetrating injury due to community violence between 2006 and 2016. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for the risk of all-cause mortality and violent reinjury within 3 years after surviving a penetrating injury.
Of the 4,280 survivors of the initial violent penetrating injury, there were 88 deaths (2.1%) and 568 violent reinjuries (13.3%) within 3 years. Compared with gunshot wound victims, stab wound victims were 31% less likely to be reinjured with a gunshot wound (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.93), 72% more likely to be reinjured with a stab wound (HR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.21-2.43), and 49% more likely to be reinjured by assault (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.14-1.94). While survivors of stabbing and firearm injuries were equally at risk for 3-year all-cause mortality, stab wound victims were 3.75 times more likely to die by a drug/alcohol overdose (HR, 3.75; 95% CI, 1.11-20.65).
Patients surviving a stab wound have a significantly higher risk of violent reinjury by stabbing or assault, and risk of death by drug/alcohol overdose. Hospital-based violence intervention programs with similar patient populations should explore options to expand partnerships with drug treatment programs. These results illustrate two distinct populations of victims of violence-gunshot victims and stabbing/assault victims-with separate risk factors and outcomes, mediated by substance use disorder.
Prognostic and Epidemiologic; level III.
医院为基础的暴力干预计划主要旨在帮助有枪支暴力风险的青少年受害者再次受伤,但社区暴力的根本原因和复杂后果是多种多样的。在这项研究中,我们研究了暴力穿透性损伤的风险因素,以及幸存者的不良后果风险因损伤类型(刺伤与枪击伤)而异的情况。
这是一项回顾性队列研究,使用了 2006 年至 2016 年间在波士顿医疗中心急诊室因社区暴力导致穿透性损伤的患者队列。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型估计了在经历穿透性损伤后 3 年内全因死亡率和暴力再损伤的风险比(HR)和 95%置信区间(95%CI)。
在 4280 名初次暴力穿透性损伤幸存者中,有 88 人(2.1%)在 3 年内死亡,568 人(13.3%)发生暴力再损伤。与枪击伤受害者相比,刺伤受害者再次发生枪击伤的风险降低了 31%(HR,0.69;95%CI,0.51-0.93),再次发生刺伤的风险增加了 72%(HR,1.72;95%CI,1.21-2.43),再次发生袭击的风险增加了 49%(HR,1.49;95%CI,1.14-1.94)。虽然刺伤和火器伤的幸存者 3 年全因死亡率风险相当,但刺伤受害者因药物/酒精过量的死亡率高 3.75 倍(HR,3.75;95%CI,1.11-20.65)。
刺伤幸存者发生暴力再刺伤和由刺伤或袭击导致的死亡的风险显著增加,药物/酒精过量导致死亡的风险也增加。具有类似患者群体的医院为基础的暴力干预计划应探索与药物治疗计划建立伙伴关系的选择。这些结果说明了两种不同的暴力受害者群体——枪击受害者和刺伤/袭击受害者,他们有不同的风险因素和后果,这与药物使用障碍有关。
预后和流行病学;三级。