27118Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Boston Violence Intervention Advocacy Program (VIAP), 1836Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Feb;38(3-4):2286-2312. doi: 10.1177/08862605221101395. Epub 2022 May 23.
Violent injury is known to be a chronic, recurrent issue, with high rates of recidivism following initial injury. While the burden of violence is disproportionately felt among young Black men and in communities of color, examination of distinct risk factors and long-term outcomes for other racial and ethnic groups could lead to improved violence intervention strategies. In this study, we examined the risk of violent penetrating injury and long-term adverse outcomes by race and ethnicity. This retrospective study was performed using a cohort of patients presenting to the Boston Medical Center emergency department for a violent penetrating injury between 2006 and 2016. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for the risk of all-cause mortality and violent re-injury at one and 3 years after surviving a penetrating injury.Of the 4191 victims of violent injury, 12% were White, 18% were Hispanic, and the remaining 70% self-identified as Black. Within 3 years after initial injury, Black patients were at the greatest risk of all-cause violent re-injury (vs. Hispanic: HR = 1.46, 95%CI[1.15,1.85], = 0.002; vs. White: HR = 1.89, 95%CI[1.40,2.57], < 0.0001), particularly by gunshot wound (vs. Hispanic: HR = 2.04, 95%CI[1.29,3.22] = 0.002; vs. White: HR = 2.34, 95%CI[1.19,4.60], = 0.01). At 3-years following initial injury, White patients were at 2.03 times the risk for all-cause mortality, likely due to a 4.96 times greater risk of death by drug or alcohol overdose for White patients compared to Black patients (HR = 4.96, 95%CI[2.25,10.96], < 0.0001). In conclusion, Black survivors of violent injury have a significantly higher risk of violent re-injury, particularly by gun violence, while White patients are at the highest risk for mortality due to the incidence of drug and alcohol overdose. Violence intervention programs with similar patient populations should explore options to collaborate with drug treatment programs to reach this vulnerable population.
暴力伤害已知是一种慢性、复发性问题,初次受伤后累犯率很高。尽管年轻人中的黑人和有色人种社区感受到的暴力负担不成比例,但检查其他种族和族裔群体的独特风险因素和长期后果,可能会导致改善暴力干预策略。在这项研究中,我们按种族和族裔检查了暴力穿透性伤害和长期不良后果的风险。这项回顾性研究使用了 2006 年至 2016 年间在波士顿医疗中心急诊室因暴力穿透性伤害就诊的患者队列。使用 Cox 比例风险回归模型估计了在穿透性伤害存活后 1 年和 3 年内所有原因死亡率和暴力再伤害的风险比 (HR) 和 95%置信区间 (95%CI)。在 4191 名暴力伤害受害者中,12%为白人,18%为西班牙裔,其余 70%自我认定为黑人。在初次受伤后 3 年内,黑人患者暴力再伤害的风险最高(与西班牙裔相比:HR = 1.46,95%CI[1.15,1.85], = 0.002;与白人相比:HR = 1.89,95%CI[1.40,2.57], < 0.0001),尤其是枪伤(与西班牙裔相比:HR = 2.04,95%CI[1.29,3.22], = 0.002;与白人相比:HR = 2.34,95%CI[1.19,4.60], = 0.01)。在初次受伤后 3 年,白人患者全因死亡率的风险是黑人患者的 2.03 倍,这可能是因为白人患者药物或酒精过量死亡的风险比黑人患者高 4.96 倍(HR = 4.96,95%CI[2.25,10.96], < 0.0001)。总之,暴力伤害的黑人幸存者暴力再伤害的风险显著更高,尤其是枪伤,而白人患者因药物和酒精过量的发生率而面临最高的死亡率风险。具有类似患者群体的暴力干预计划应探讨与药物治疗计划合作的选择,以接触到这一弱势群体。