Ye Yisheng, Wu Ruijun, Ge Yao, Wang Tao, Yao Xin, Yang Yao, Long Chengxu, Chen Fangfei, Tang Shangfeng, Huang Rui
School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 13 Hangkong Road, Wuhan, China.
China National Center for Biotechnology Development, Beijing, China.
Infect Dis Poverty. 2021 Jul 20;10(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s40249-021-00884-7.
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic is an international public health threat, and people's participation in disease-related preventive behaviours is the key to controlling infectious diseases. This study aimed to assess the differences in adopting preventive behaviours among populations to explore potential individual and household factors and inequalities within families.
This online survey was conducted in April 2020. The directional stratified convenient sampling method was used to select 4704 participants from eight provinces in eastern, central, and western China. The questionnaire included demographic information, household variables, and five target prevention behaviours. The chi-squared test, binary multilevel model, and Mantel-Haenszel hierarchical analysis were used for data analysis in the study.
Approximately 71.2% of the participants had appropriate outdoor prevention, and 32.9% of the participants had indoor protection in place. Sharing behaviours (P < 0.001) and education level (P < 0.001) were positively associated with adopting preventive measures. The inhibiting effect of household crowding and stimulating effect of high household income on preventive behaviours were determined in this study. Household size was negatively associated with living area (β = -0.057, P < 0.05) and living style (β = -0.077, P < 0.05). Household income was positively associated with age (β = 0.023, P < 0.05), and relationship with friends (β = 0.053, P < 0.05). Vulnerable groups, such as older adults or women, are more likely to have inadequate preventive behaviours. Older adults (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.09-2.15), women (OR = 1.37, 95% CI 1.15-1.64), and those with more than 2 suspected symptoms (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.07-3.19) were more likely to be affected by the inhibiting effect of household crowding, while the stimulating effect of high household income was limited in these groups.
Inequalities in COVID-19 prevention behaviours exist between families and inadequate adoption of prevention by vulnerable groups are noteworthy. This study expands the research perspective by emphasizing the role of household factors in preventive behaviours and by focusing on family inequalities. The government should use traditional media as a platform to enhance residents' public health knowledge. Targeted additional wage subsidies, investments in affordable housing, financial support for multigenerational households, and temporary relocation policies may deserve more attention. Communities could play a critical role in COVID-19 prevention.
2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)大流行是一项国际公共卫生威胁,而人们对疾病相关预防行为的参与是控制传染病的关键。本研究旨在评估不同人群在采取预防行为方面的差异,以探索潜在的个人和家庭因素以及家庭内部的不平等情况。
这项在线调查于2020年4月进行。采用定向分层便利抽样方法,从中国东部、中部和西部八个省份选取了4704名参与者。问卷包括人口统计学信息、家庭变量以及五种目标预防行为。研究中使用卡方检验、二元多级模型和Mantel-Haenszel分层分析进行数据分析。
约71.2%的参与者有适当的户外预防措施,32.9%的参与者有室内防护措施。分享行为(P<0.001)和教育水平(P<0.001)与采取预防措施呈正相关。本研究确定了家庭拥挤对预防行为的抑制作用以及高家庭收入对预防行为的促进作用。家庭规模与居住面积(β=-0.057,P<0.05)和生活方式(β=-0.077,P<0.05)呈负相关。家庭收入与年龄(β=0.023,P<0.05)以及与朋友的关系(β=0.053,P<0.05)呈正相关。弱势群体,如老年人或女性,更有可能存在预防行为不足的情况。老年人(OR=1.53,95%CI 1.09-2.15)、女性(OR=1.37,95%CI 1.15-1.64)以及有超过2种疑似症状的人(OR=1.85,95%CI 1.07-3.19)更容易受到家庭拥挤抑制作用的影响,而高家庭收入的促进作用在这些群体中有限。
COVID-19预防行为在家庭之间存在不平等,弱势群体预防措施采用不足值得关注。本研究通过强调家庭因素在预防行为中的作用以及关注家庭不平等扩大了研究视角。政府应利用传统媒体作为平台,增强居民的公共卫生知识。有针对性的额外工资补贴、对经济适用房的投资、对多代同堂家庭的财政支持以及临时搬迁政策可能值得更多关注。社区在COVID-19预防中可发挥关键作用。