• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新冠疫情期间社交媒体使用、电子健康素养、疾病知识及预防行为:针对中国网民的横断面研究

Social Media Use, eHealth Literacy, Disease Knowledge, and Preventive Behaviors in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study on Chinese Netizens.

作者信息

Li Xiaojing, Liu Qinliang

机构信息

Center for Health and Medical Communication, School of Media & Communication, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 9;22(10):e19684. doi: 10.2196/19684.

DOI:10.2196/19684
PMID:33006940
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7581310/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Since its outbreak in January 2020, COVID-19 has quickly spread worldwide and has become a global pandemic. Social media platforms have been recognized as important tools for health-promoting practices in public health, and the use of social media is widespread among the public. However, little is known about the effects of social media use on health promotion during a pandemic such as COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to explore the predictive role of social media use on public preventive behaviors in China during the COVID-19 pandemic and how disease knowledge and eHealth literacy moderated the relationship between social media use and preventive behaviors.

METHODS

A national web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted by a proportionate probability sampling among 802 Chinese internet users ("netizens") in February 2020. Descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and hierarchical multiple regressions were employed to examine and explore the relationships among all the variables.

RESULTS

Almost half the 802 study participants were male (416, 51.9%), and the average age of the participants was 32.65 years. Most of the 802 participants had high education levels (624, 77.7%), had high income >¥5000 (US $736.29) (525, 65.3%), were married (496, 61.8%), and were in good health (486, 60.6%). The average time of social media use was approximately 2 to 3 hours per day (mean 2.34 hours, SD 1.11), and the most frequently used media types were public social media (mean score 4.49/5, SD 0.78) and aggregated social media (mean score 4.07/5, SD 1.07). Social media use frequency (β=.20, P<.001) rather than time significantly predicted preventive behaviors for COVID-19. Respondents were also equipped with high levels of disease knowledge (mean score 8.15/10, SD 1.43) and eHealth literacy (mean score 3.79/5, SD 0.59). Disease knowledge (β=.11, P=.001) and eHealth literacy (β=.27, P<.001) were also significant predictors of preventive behaviors. Furthermore, eHealth literacy (P=.038) and disease knowledge (P=.03) positively moderated the relationship between social media use frequency and preventive behaviors, while eHealth literacy (β=.07) affected this relationship positively and disease knowledge (β=-.07) affected it negatively. Different social media types differed in predicting an individual's preventive behaviors for COVID-19. Aggregated social media (β=.22, P<.001) was the best predictor, followed by public social media (β=.14, P<.001) and professional social media (β=.11, P=.002). However, official social media (β=.02, P=.597) was an insignificant predictor.

CONCLUSIONS

Social media is an effective tool to promote behaviors to prevent COVID-19 among the public. Health literacy is essential for promotion of individual health and influences the extent to which the public engages in preventive behaviors during a pandemic. Our results not only enrich the theoretical paradigm of public health management and health communication but also have practical implications in pandemic control for China and other countries.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2239/7581310/f5c32000de96/jmir_v22i10e19684_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2239/7581310/6784e167e20e/jmir_v22i10e19684_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2239/7581310/eb93884d5b3a/jmir_v22i10e19684_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2239/7581310/f5c32000de96/jmir_v22i10e19684_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2239/7581310/6784e167e20e/jmir_v22i10e19684_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2239/7581310/eb93884d5b3a/jmir_v22i10e19684_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2239/7581310/f5c32000de96/jmir_v22i10e19684_fig3.jpg
摘要

背景

自2020年1月爆发以来,新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)迅速在全球传播,成为全球大流行疾病。社交媒体平台已被公认为公共卫生领域促进健康行为的重要工具,且社交媒体在公众中使用广泛。然而,对于在诸如COVID-19这样的大流行期间使用社交媒体对健康促进的影响知之甚少。

目的

在本研究中,我们旨在探讨在中国COVID-19大流行期间社交媒体使用对公众预防行为的预测作用,以及疾病知识和电子健康素养如何调节社交媒体使用与预防行为之间的关系。

方法

2020年2月,通过按比例概率抽样对802名中国互联网用户(“网民”)进行了一项基于网络的全国横断面调查。采用描述性统计、Pearson相关性分析和分层多元回归分析来检验和探索所有变量之间的关系。

结果

802名研究参与者中近一半为男性(416名,51.9%),参与者的平均年龄为32.65岁。802名参与者中大多数具有高学历(624名,77.7%),高收入>5000元(736.29美元)(525名,65.3%),已婚(496名,61.8%),且健康状况良好(486名,60.6%)。社交媒体的平均使用时间约为每天2至3小时(平均2.34小时。标准差1.11),最常使用的媒体类型是公共社交媒体(平均得分4.49/5,标准差0.78)和聚合社交媒体(平均得分4.07/5,标准差1.07)。社交媒体使用频率(β=0.20,P<0.001)而非使用时间能显著预测COVID-19的预防行为。受访者还具备较高水平的疾病知识(平均得分8.15/10,标准差1.43)和电子健康素养(平均得分3.79/5,标准差0.59)。疾病知识(β=0.11,P=0.001)和电子健康素养(β=0.27,P<0.001)也是预防行为的显著预测因素。此外,电子健康素养(P=0.038)和疾病知识(P=0.03)正向调节社交媒体使用频率与预防行为之间的关系,而电子健康素养(β=0.07)对这种关系有正向影响,疾病知识(β=-0.07)对其有负向影响。不同类型的社交媒体在预测个体对COVID-19的预防行为方面存在差异。聚合社交媒体(β=0.22,P<0.001)是最佳预测因素,其次是公共社交媒体(β=0.14,P<0.001)和专业社交媒体(β=0.11,P=0.002)。然而,官方社交媒体(β=0.02,P=0.597)是一个不显著的预测因素。

结论

社交媒体是促进公众预防COVID-19行为的有效工具。健康素养对于促进个体健康至关重要,并影响公众在大流行期间参与预防行为的程度。我们的研究结果不仅丰富了公共卫生管理和健康传播的理论范式,而且对中国和其他国家的疫情防控具有实际意义。

相似文献

1
Social Media Use, eHealth Literacy, Disease Knowledge, and Preventive Behaviors in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Cross-Sectional Study on Chinese Netizens.新冠疫情期间社交媒体使用、电子健康素养、疾病知识及预防行为:针对中国网民的横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Oct 9;22(10):e19684. doi: 10.2196/19684.
2
Associations Between Health Literacy, eHealth Literacy, and COVID-19-Related Health Behaviors Among Chinese College Students: Cross-sectional Online Study.健康素养、电子健康素养与中国大学生 COVID-19 相关健康行为的关系:一项横断面在线研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 May 6;23(5):e25600. doi: 10.2196/25600.
3
Social Media Use, eHealth Literacy, Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Toward COVID-19 Vaccination Among Chinese College Students in the Phase of Regular Epidemic Prevention and Control: A Cross-Sectional Survey.社交媒体使用、电子健康素养、知识、态度和针对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的实践在常规疫情防控阶段的中国大学生中的应用:一项横断面调查。
Front Public Health. 2022 Jan 27;9:754904. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.754904. eCollection 2021.
4
Relationship Between Coronavirus-Related eHealth Literacy and COVID-19 Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among US Adults: Web-Based Survey Study.美国成年人中与冠状病毒相关的电子健康素养与COVID-19知识、态度和行为之间的关系:基于网络的调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Mar 29;23(3):e25042. doi: 10.2196/25042.
5
Cross-Verification of COVID-19 Information Obtained From Unofficial Social Media Accounts and Associated Changes in Health Behaviors: Web-Based Questionnaire Study Among Chinese Netizens.从非官方社交媒体账户获取的 COVID-19 信息的交叉验证及相关健康行为变化:一项针对中国网民的基于网络的问卷调查研究。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2022 May 31;8(5):e33577. doi: 10.2196/33577.
6
Factors Affecting Infection Control Behaviors to Prevent COVID-19: An Online Survey of Nursing Students in Anhui, China in March and April 2020.影响预防新型冠状病毒肺炎感染控制行为的因素:2020年3月至4月对中国安徽护理专业学生的在线调查
Med Sci Monit. 2020 Oct 11;26:e925877. doi: 10.12659/MSM.925877.
7
Health Perceptions and Misconceptions Regarding COVID-19 in China: Online Survey Study.中国关于新冠病毒病的健康认知与误解:在线调查研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 2;22(11):e21099. doi: 10.2196/21099.
8
Socioeconomic Disparities in eHealth Literacy and Preventive Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong: Cross-sectional Study.**题目**:在香港,新冠疫情期间电子健康素养和预防行为的社会经济差异:一项横断面研究。 **解析**:原文“Socioeconomic Disparities in eHealth Literacy and Preventive Behaviors During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Hong Kong: Cross-sectional Study.”是一个较长的英文句子,翻译时需要注意断句和中文表达习惯。“eHealth Literacy”翻译为“电子健康素养”,“preventive behaviors”翻译为“预防行为”。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Apr 14;23(4):e24577. doi: 10.2196/24577.
9
Knowledge, Perceived Beliefs, and Preventive Behaviors Related to COVID-19 Among Chinese Older Adults: Cross-Sectional Web-Based Survey.中文老年人群对 COVID-19 的知识、认知信念和预防行为:基于网络的横断面调查。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Dec 31;22(12):e23729. doi: 10.2196/23729.
10
eHealth Literacy and Web-Based Health Information-Seeking Behaviors on COVID-19 in Japan: Internet-Based Mixed Methods Study.电子健康素养与日本 COVID-19 期间的网络健康信息搜索行为:基于互联网的混合方法研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Jul 11;26:e57842. doi: 10.2196/57842.

引用本文的文献

1
A National Discussion of COVID-19 on Twitter.推特上关于新冠疫情的全国性讨论。
J Assoc Med Microbiol Infect Dis Can. 2024 Dec 19;9(4):294-307. doi: 10.3138/jammi-2024-0004. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
eHealth Literacy and Its Outcomes Among Postsecondary Students: Systematic Review.高等院校学生的电子健康素养及其结果:系统评价
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 2;27:e64489. doi: 10.2196/64489.
3
How the General Public Navigates Health Misinformation on Social Media: Qualitative Study of Identification and Response Approaches.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of awareness diffusion and self-initiated awareness behavior on epidemic spreading - An approach based on multiplex networks.意识传播和自发意识行为对疫情传播的影响——一种基于多重网络的方法。
Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2017 Mar;44:193-203. doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2016.08.007. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
2
What Can Twitter Tell Us about Skin Cancer Communication and Prevention on Social Media?社交媒体上的皮肤癌信息传播和预防:推特能告诉我们什么?
Dermatology. 2020;236(2):81-89. doi: 10.1159/000506458. Epub 2020 Feb 25.
3
Three Emerging Coronaviruses in Two Decades.
公众如何在社交媒体上应对健康错误信息:识别与应对方法的定性研究
JMIR Infodemiology. 2025 Jun 24;5:e67464. doi: 10.2196/67464.
4
Understanding health literacy and digital healthy diet literacy in rural women in Türkiye: a cross-sectional study on social media use and Mediterranean diet adherence.了解土耳其农村妇女的健康素养和数字健康饮食素养:一项关于社交媒体使用和地中海饮食依从性的横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 30;13:1559159. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1559159. eCollection 2025.
5
Digital Therapeutics in China: Comprehensive Review.中国的数字疗法:全面综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 27;27:e70955. doi: 10.2196/70955.
6
Media portrayals and social stigma surrounding COVID-19 survivors: a content analysis of Chinese media coverage.关于新冠病毒肺炎康复者的媒体报道与社会污名:中国媒体报道的内容分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Mar 31;25(1):1222. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21840-2.
7
Decomposition and Comparative Analysis of Urban-Rural Disparities in eHealth Literacy Among Chinese University Students: Cross-Sectional Study.中国大学生电子健康素养城乡差异的分解与比较分析:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 26;27:e63671. doi: 10.2196/63671.
8
Investigating the electronic health literacy promotion strategies in adolescent girls: A cross-sectional study in Iran.调查青春期女孩的电子健康素养提升策略:伊朗的一项横断面研究。
J Educ Health Promot. 2025 Jan 31;14:27. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1980_23. eCollection 2025.
9
Factors Influencing eHealth Literacy Worldwide: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.全球范围内影响电子健康素养的因素:系统评价与荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Mar 10;27:e50313. doi: 10.2196/50313.
10
Spatiotemporal effect of internet use on life expectancy: cross-country insight from a geographically and temporally weighted analysis.互联网使用对预期寿命的时空效应:基于地理和时间加权分析的跨国洞察
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 11;25(1):569. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21760-1.
二十年间出现的三种新型冠状病毒。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2020 Mar 9;153(4):420-421. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqaa029.
4
The COVID-19 epidemic.新冠疫情。
Trop Med Int Health. 2020 Mar;25(3):278-280. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13383. Epub 2020 Feb 16.
5
The Impact of Online Health Information on Patient Health Behaviours and Making Decisions Concerning Health.在线健康信息对患者健康行为和健康决策的影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Jan 31;17(3):880. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17030880.
6
Local risk perception enhances epidemic control.地方风险感知增强疫情防控。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 3;14(12):e0225576. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225576. eCollection 2019.
7
Electronic Health Literacy and Dietary Behaviors in Taiwanese College Students: Cross-Sectional Study.台湾大学生的电子健康素养与饮食行为:横断面研究
J Med Internet Res. 2019 Nov 26;21(11):e13140. doi: 10.2196/13140.
8
How Social Media Exposure to Health Information Influences Chinese People's Health Protective Behavior during Air Pollution: A Theory of Planned Behavior Perspective.社交媒体健康信息接触如何影响中国人在空气污染期间的健康保护行为:计划行为理论视角。
Health Commun. 2021 Mar;36(3):324-333. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2019.1692486. Epub 2019 Nov 24.
9
Efficacy of a Web-Based Intervention to Increase Uptake of Maternal Vaccines: An RCT.基于网络的干预措施提高产妇疫苗接种率的效果:一项 RCT 研究。
Am J Prev Med. 2019 Oct;57(4):e125-e133. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 Aug 27.
10
The Web-Based Randomized Controlled Intervention as the Enhancer of Cancer Prevention.基于网络的随机对照干预作为癌症预防的增强手段。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Aug 3;55(8):434. doi: 10.3390/medicina55080434.