Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Center for Health and The Social Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Nov;61(5):692-700. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
Depression is a prevalent condition for which screening rates remain low and disparities in screening exist. This study examines the impacts of a medical assistant screening protocol on the rates of depression screening, overall and by sociodemographic groups, in a primary care setting.
Between September 2016 and August 2018, a quasi-experimental study of adult primary care visits was conducted at an urban academic clinic to ascertain the change in the rates of completion of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 after the implementation of a medical assistant protocol (intervention) versus that of physician-only screening (control arm). Analyses were conducted between April 2019 and April 2020 and used interrupted time-series models with generalized estimating equations.
A total of 45,157 visits by 21,377 unique patients were included. Overall, screening increased from 18% (physician-only screening) to 57% (medical assistant protocol) (p<0.0001). Screening increased for all measured demographics. With physician screening, depression screening was less likely to occur at visits by women (than at visits by men; OR=0.91, 95% CI=0.85, 0.98) and at visits by Black/African American patients (than at visits by White; OR=0.91, 95% CI=0.84, 0.99). However, with the medical assistant protocol, depression screening was more likely to occur at visits by women (than at visits by men; OR=1.07, 95% CI=1.0002, 1.14) and at visits by Black/African American patients (than at visits by White; OR=1.11, 95% CI=1.02, 1.20). In addition, age-related disparities were mitigated for visits by patients aged 40-64 and ≥65 years (e.g., age ≥65 years: physician, OR=0.66, 95% CI=0.59, 0.73; medical assistant protocol, OR=0.78, 95% CI=0.71, 0.85), compared with visits by patients aged 18-39 years.
Implementation of a medical assistant protocol in a primary care setting may significantly increase depression screening rates while mitigating or removing sociodemographic disparities.
抑郁症是一种普遍存在的疾病,但其筛查率仍然较低,且存在筛查差异。本研究旨在探讨在初级保健环境中,医疗助理筛查方案对抑郁症筛查率的影响,包括总体筛查率和按社会人口统计学分组的筛查率。
2016 年 9 月至 2018 年 8 月,在一家城市学术诊所进行了一项成人初级保健就诊的准实验研究,以确定实施医疗助理方案(干预组)与仅由医生进行筛查(对照组)后,完成患者健康问卷-2 的比例变化。分析于 2019 年 4 月至 2020 年 4 月进行,使用广义估计方程的中断时间序列模型。
共纳入 45157 次就诊,涉及 21377 名患者。总体而言,筛查率从 18%(仅由医生进行筛查)增加到 57%(医疗助理方案)(p<0.0001)。所有测量的人口统计学特征均显示筛查率增加。在仅由医生进行筛查时,女性就诊时(与男性就诊时相比;OR=0.91,95%CI=0.85,0.98)和黑人/非裔美国人就诊时(与白人就诊时相比;OR=0.91,95%CI=0.84,0.99)接受抑郁症筛查的可能性较低。然而,在医疗助理方案中,女性就诊时(与男性就诊时相比;OR=1.07,95%CI=1.0002,1.14)和黑人/非裔美国人就诊时(与白人就诊时相比;OR=1.11,95%CI=1.02,1.20)接受抑郁症筛查的可能性更高。此外,对于 40-64 岁和≥65 岁的患者就诊(例如,年龄≥65 岁:医生,OR=0.66,95%CI=0.59,0.73;医疗助理方案,OR=0.78,95%CI=0.71,0.85),与 18-39 岁的患者就诊相比,年龄相关性差异得到缓解。
在初级保健环境中实施医疗助理方案可能会显著提高抑郁症筛查率,同时减轻或消除社会人口统计学差异。