Suppr超能文献

医疗助理方案可改善抑郁症筛检率的差异。

Medical Assistant Protocol Improves Disparities in Depression Screening Rates.

机构信息

Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

Center for Health and The Social Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.

出版信息

Am J Prev Med. 2021 Nov;61(5):692-700. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 Jul 18.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Depression is a prevalent condition for which screening rates remain low and disparities in screening exist. This study examines the impacts of a medical assistant screening protocol on the rates of depression screening, overall and by sociodemographic groups, in a primary care setting.

METHODS

Between September 2016 and August 2018, a quasi-experimental study of adult primary care visits was conducted at an urban academic clinic to ascertain the change in the rates of completion of the Patient Health Questionnaire-2 after the implementation of a medical assistant protocol (intervention) versus that of physician-only screening (control arm). Analyses were conducted between April 2019 and April 2020 and used interrupted time-series models with generalized estimating equations.

RESULTS

A total of 45,157 visits by 21,377 unique patients were included. Overall, screening increased from 18% (physician-only screening) to 57% (medical assistant protocol) (p<0.0001). Screening increased for all measured demographics. With physician screening, depression screening was less likely to occur at visits by women (than at visits by men; OR=0.91, 95% CI=0.85, 0.98) and at visits by Black/African American patients (than at visits by White; OR=0.91, 95% CI=0.84, 0.99). However, with the medical assistant protocol, depression screening was more likely to occur at visits by women (than at visits by men; OR=1.07, 95% CI=1.0002, 1.14) and at visits by Black/African American patients (than at visits by White; OR=1.11, 95% CI=1.02, 1.20). In addition, age-related disparities were mitigated for visits by patients aged 40-64 and ≥65 years (e.g., age ≥65 years: physician, OR=0.66, 95% CI=0.59, 0.73; medical assistant protocol, OR=0.78, 95% CI=0.71, 0.85), compared with visits by patients aged 18-39 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a medical assistant protocol in a primary care setting may significantly increase depression screening rates while mitigating or removing sociodemographic disparities.

摘要

介绍

抑郁症是一种普遍存在的疾病,但其筛查率仍然较低,且存在筛查差异。本研究旨在探讨在初级保健环境中,医疗助理筛查方案对抑郁症筛查率的影响,包括总体筛查率和按社会人口统计学分组的筛查率。

方法

2016 年 9 月至 2018 年 8 月,在一家城市学术诊所进行了一项成人初级保健就诊的准实验研究,以确定实施医疗助理方案(干预组)与仅由医生进行筛查(对照组)后,完成患者健康问卷-2 的比例变化。分析于 2019 年 4 月至 2020 年 4 月进行,使用广义估计方程的中断时间序列模型。

结果

共纳入 45157 次就诊,涉及 21377 名患者。总体而言,筛查率从 18%(仅由医生进行筛查)增加到 57%(医疗助理方案)(p<0.0001)。所有测量的人口统计学特征均显示筛查率增加。在仅由医生进行筛查时,女性就诊时(与男性就诊时相比;OR=0.91,95%CI=0.85,0.98)和黑人/非裔美国人就诊时(与白人就诊时相比;OR=0.91,95%CI=0.84,0.99)接受抑郁症筛查的可能性较低。然而,在医疗助理方案中,女性就诊时(与男性就诊时相比;OR=1.07,95%CI=1.0002,1.14)和黑人/非裔美国人就诊时(与白人就诊时相比;OR=1.11,95%CI=1.02,1.20)接受抑郁症筛查的可能性更高。此外,对于 40-64 岁和≥65 岁的患者就诊(例如,年龄≥65 岁:医生,OR=0.66,95%CI=0.59,0.73;医疗助理方案,OR=0.78,95%CI=0.71,0.85),与 18-39 岁的患者就诊相比,年龄相关性差异得到缓解。

结论

在初级保健环境中实施医疗助理方案可能会显著提高抑郁症筛查率,同时减轻或消除社会人口统计学差异。

相似文献

1
Medical Assistant Protocol Improves Disparities in Depression Screening Rates.
Am J Prev Med. 2021 Nov;61(5):692-700. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.05.010. Epub 2021 Jul 18.
2
Patient-physician communication in the primary care visits of African Americans and whites with depression.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 May;23(5):600-6. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0539-7. Epub 2008 Feb 9.
4
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in the Performance of Prediction Models for Death by Suicide After Mental Health Visits.
JAMA Psychiatry. 2021 Jul 1;78(7):726-734. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0493.
5
Disparities in osteoporosis screening between at-risk African-American and white women.
J Gen Intern Med. 2005 Sep;20(9):847-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0157.x.
6
Racial disparities in insurance reimbursement for physician professional services in the ED.
Am J Emerg Med. 2014 Sep;32(9):1060-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.06.029. Epub 2014 Jul 1.
7
Association between sociodemographic factors, clinic characteristics and mental health screening rates in primary care.
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 28;19(3):e0301125. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0301125. eCollection 2024.
9
Screening for Depression in African-American Churches.
Am J Prev Med. 2015 Oct;49(4):526-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2015.03.039. Epub 2015 Jul 29.
10
Black women receive less mammography even with similar use of primary care.
Ann Intern Med. 1996 Aug 1;125(3):173-82. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-3-199608010-00002.

引用本文的文献

2
Evaluating Clinical Decision Supports to Improve Adolescent Depression Screening and Management in Pediatric Primary Care.
Acad Pediatr. 2025 Aug;25(6):102839. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2025.102839. Epub 2025 Apr 22.
3
Improving Depression Screening in Adult Patients With Cancer.
J Adv Pract Oncol. 2024 Nov 5:1-6. doi: 10.6004/jadpro.2024.15.8.20.
4
Implementation of an EHR-integrated web-based depression assessment in primary care: PORTAL-Depression.
JAMIA Open. 2024 Sep 24;7(3):ooae094. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae094. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
[Effectiveness of the clinical assistant in the control of hypertensive and diabetic patients in primary care].
Aten Primaria. 2024 Jun;56(6):102853. doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2023.102853. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
7
Pragmatic Clinical Trial of Population Health, Portal-Based Depression Screening: the PORTAL-Depression Study.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Mar;38(4):857-864. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07779-9. Epub 2022 Sep 20.
8
Elements of Integrated Behavioral Health Associated with Primary Care Provider Confidence in Managing Depression at Community Health Centers.
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Sep;37(12):2931-2940. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-07294-3. Epub 2022 Jan 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of Report Cards to Increase Primary Care Physician Depression Screening.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jul;36(7):2182-2183. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06065-w. Epub 2020 Jul 23.
2
Collaborative Care for Depression of Adults and Adolescents: Measuring the Effectiveness of Screening and Treatment Uptake.
Psychiatr Serv. 2019 Jul 1;70(7):604-607. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800257. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
3
Racial and ethnic differences in depression: current perspectives.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2019 Feb 22;15:603-609. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S128584. eCollection 2019.
4
Missed Opportunities for Depression Screening and Treatment in the United States.
J Am Board Fam Med. 2018 May-Jun;31(3):389-397. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2018.03.170406.
6
The Primary Care Behavioral Health (PCBH) Model: An Overview and Operational Definition.
J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2018 Jun;25(2):109-126. doi: 10.1007/s10880-017-9531-x.
7
Prevalence and Medical Costs of Chronic Diseases Among Adult Medicaid Beneficiaries.
Am J Prev Med. 2017 Dec;53(6S2):S143-S154. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2017.07.019.
8
Management of Depression in Older Adults: A Review.
JAMA. 2017 May 23;317(20):2114-2122. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.5706.
9
National Rates and Patterns of Depression Screening in Primary Care: Results From 2012 and 2013.
Psychiatr Serv. 2017 Jul 1;68(7):660-666. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201600096. Epub 2017 Feb 15.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验