• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Association of Glycemia, Lipids, and Blood Pressure With Cognitive Performance in People With Type 2 Diabetes in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE).血糖、血脂和血压与 2 型糖尿病患者认知功能的关系:糖尿病血糖降低方法的比较效果研究(GRADE)。
Diabetes Care. 2021 Oct;44(10):2286-2292. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2858. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
2
Influence of Baseline Diastolic Blood Pressure on the Effects of Systolic Blood Pressure Lowering on Cognitive Function in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.基础舒张压对 2 型糖尿病患者降压治疗对认知功能影响的研究。
Am J Hypertens. 2023 Feb 13;36(2):120-125. doi: 10.1093/ajh/hpac118.
3
BMI, insulin sensitivity, and cognition in early type 2 diabetes: The Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study.体重指数、胰岛素敏感性与 2 型糖尿病早期认知功能:糖尿病血糖控制治疗的比较及疗效研究。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023 Jul;31(7):1812-1824. doi: 10.1002/oby.23785.
4
Effect of Hypertension Duration and Blood Pressure Control During Early Adulthood on Cognitive Function in Middle Age.高血压病程和成年早期血压控制对中年认知功能的影响。
J Alzheimers Dis. 2022;85(2):779-789. doi: 10.3233/JAD-215070.
5
The cross-sectional association of renal dysfunction with tests of cognition in middle-aged adults with early type 2 diabetes: The GRADE Study.肾功能障碍与早期 2 型糖尿病中年患者认知测试的横断面关联:GRADE 研究。
J Diabetes Complications. 2021 Mar;35(3):107805. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2020.107805. Epub 2020 Nov 26.
6
Diastolic Blood Pressure and Cognitive Functioning: Differences by Systolic Blood Pressure Among US Adults.舒张压与认知功能:美国成年人中收缩压的差异。
Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen. 2023 Jan-Dec;38:15333175231172283. doi: 10.1177/15333175231172283.
7
Metformin, Lifestyle Intervention, and Cognition in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study.糖尿病预防计划结果研究中的二甲双胍、生活方式干预与认知
Diabetes Care. 2017 Jul;40(7):958-965. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2376. Epub 2017 May 12.
8
Association of JNC-8 and SPRINT Systolic Blood Pressure Levels With Cognitive Function and Related Racial Disparity.美国国家联合委员会第8次报告(JNC - 8)和强化血压干预试验(SPRINT)的收缩压水平与认知功能及相关种族差异的关联
JAMA Neurol. 2017 Oct 1;74(10):1199-1205. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.1863.
9
The cross-sectional association of cognition with diabetic peripheral and autonomic neuropathy-The GRADE study.认知与糖尿病周围和自主神经病变的横断面关联——GRADE 研究。
J Diabetes Complications. 2021 Dec;35(12):108047. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2021.108047. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
10
Long-Term Blood Pressure Level and Variability From Midlife to Later Life and Subsequent Cognitive Change: The ARIC Neurocognitive Study.从中年到晚年的长期血压水平和变异性与随后的认知变化:ARIC 神经认知研究。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 Aug 7;7(15):e009578. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009578.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous glucose monitoring-derived time in range is associated with changes in cognitive function test scores in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.在日本2型糖尿病患者中,持续葡萄糖监测得出的血糖在目标范围内的时间与认知功能测试分数的变化相关。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Sep;27(9):4737-4746. doi: 10.1111/dom.16511. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
2
Diabetes complications and cognitive function in young adults with youth-onset type 1 or type 2 diabetes: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study.青年起病 1 型或 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病并发症与认知功能:青少年糖尿病研究(SEARCH)。
Pediatr Diabetes. 2023;2023. doi: 10.1155/2023/4860831. Epub 2023 Apr 8.
3
Association of Baseline Factors With Glycemic Outcomes in GRADE: A Comparative Effectiveness Randomized Clinical Trial.基线因素与 GRADE 血糖结局的关联:一项比较有效性随机临床试验。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Apr 1;47(4):562-570. doi: 10.2337/dc23-1782.
4
BMI, insulin sensitivity, and cognition in early type 2 diabetes: The Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study.体重指数、胰岛素敏感性与 2 型糖尿病早期认知功能:糖尿病血糖控制治疗的比较及疗效研究。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2023 Jul;31(7):1812-1824. doi: 10.1002/oby.23785.
5
Investigating the causal mediating effect of type 2 diabetes on the relationship between traits and systolic blood pressure: A two-step Mendelian randomization study.探究 2 型糖尿病在特质与收缩压之间关系中的因果中介效应:两步孟德尔随机化研究。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 Dec 16;13:1090867. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1090867. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Effects of Weight Loss on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Severity. Ten-Year Results of the Sleep AHEAD Study.减肥对阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停严重程度的影响。睡眠前期研究的十年结果。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2021 Jan 15;203(2):221-229. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201912-2511OC.
2
Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral White Matter Lesions.强化与标准血压控制与脑白质病变的关联。
JAMA. 2019 Aug 13;322(6):524-534. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10551.
3
Baseline Characteristics of Randomized Participants in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE).糖尿病血糖降低方法的随机参与者的基线特征:一项比较效果研究(GRADE)。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Nov;42(11):2098-2107. doi: 10.2337/dc19-0901. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
4
Neurovascular and Cognitive Dysfunction in Hypertension.高血压的神经血管和认知功能障碍。
Circ Res. 2019 Mar 29;124(7):1025-1044. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313260.
5
Effect of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control on Probable Dementia: A Randomized Clinical Trial.强化与标准血压控制对可能发生的痴呆的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2019 Feb 12;321(6):553-561. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.21442.
6
10. Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management: .10. 心血管疾病与风险管理: 。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S103-S123. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S010.
7
6. Glycemic Targets: .6. 血糖目标: 。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jan;42(Suppl 1):S61-S70. doi: 10.2337/dc19-S006.
8
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
9
Do statins impair cognition? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.他汀类药物会损害认知功能吗?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Mar;30(3):348-58. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3115-3. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
10
Statin-related cognitive impairment in the real world: you'll live longer, but you might not like it.现实世界中与他汀类药物相关的认知障碍:你可能会长寿,但你可能并不喜欢这样。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Dec;174(12):1889. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5376.

血糖、血脂和血压与 2 型糖尿病患者认知功能的关系:糖尿病血糖降低方法的比较效果研究(GRADE)。

Association of Glycemia, Lipids, and Blood Pressure With Cognitive Performance in People With Type 2 Diabetes in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE).

机构信息

Departments of Medicine and Epidemiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY

The Biostatistics Center, Department of Bios-tatistics and Bioinformatics, Milken Institute of Public Health, The George Washington University, Rockville, MD.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2021 Oct;44(10):2286-2292. doi: 10.2337/dc20-2858. Epub 2021 Jul 20.

DOI:10.2337/dc20-2858
PMID:34285097
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8740937/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for cognitive impairment. We examined the relation of glycemia, lipids, blood pressure (BP), hypertension history, and statin use with cognition in the Glycemia Reduction Approaches in Diabetes: A Comparative Effectiveness Study (GRADE).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Cross-sectional analyses from GRADE at baseline examined the association of glycemia (hemoglobin A [HbA]), LDL, systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP), hypertension history, and statin use with cognition assessed by the Spanish English Verbal Learning Test, letter and animal fluency tests, and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST).

RESULTS

Among 5,047 GRADE participants, 5,018 (99.4%) completed cognitive assessments. Their mean age was 56.7 ± 10.0 years, and 36.4% were women. Mean diabetes duration was 4.0 ± 2.7 years. HbA was not related to cognition. Higher LDL was related to modestly worse DSST scores, whereas statin use was related to modestly better DSST scores. SBP between 120 and 139 mmHg and DBP between 80 and 89 mmHg were related to modestly better DSST scores. Hypertension history was not related to cognition.

CONCLUSIONS

In people with type 2 diabetes of a mean duration of <5 years, lower LDL and statin use were related to modestly better executive cognitive function. SBP levels in the range of 120-139 mmHg and DBP levels in the range of 80-89 mmHg, but not lower levels, were related to modestly better executive function. These differences may not be clinically significant.

摘要

目的

2 型糖尿病是认知障碍的一个危险因素。我们研究了血糖、血脂、血压(BP)、高血压病史和他汀类药物使用与糖尿病血糖控制研究(GRADE)中认知的关系。

研究设计和方法

GRADE 的横断面分析在基线时检查了血糖(血红蛋白 A [HbA])、LDL、收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)、高血压病史和他汀类药物使用与通过西班牙-英语词汇学习测试、字母和动物流畅性测试以及数字符号替代测试(DSST)评估的认知之间的关联。

结果

在 5047 名 GRADE 参与者中,有 5018 名(99.4%)完成了认知评估。他们的平均年龄为 56.7 ± 10.0 岁,36.4%为女性。平均糖尿病病程为 4.0 ± 2.7 年。HbA 与认知无关。较高的 LDL 与 DSST 分数略有下降相关,而他汀类药物使用与 DSST 分数略有升高相关。120-139mmHg 之间的 SBP 和 80-89mmHg 之间的 DBP 与 DSST 分数略有升高相关。高血压病史与认知无关。

结论

在平均病程<5 年的 2 型糖尿病患者中,较低的 LDL 和他汀类药物使用与执行认知功能略有改善相关。120-139mmHg 之间的 SBP 和 80-89mmHg 之间的 DBP,而不是较低的水平,与执行功能略有改善相关。这些差异可能没有临床意义。