Suppr超能文献

强化与标准血压控制与脑白质病变的关联。

Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral White Matter Lesions.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.

出版信息

JAMA. 2019 Aug 13;322(6):524-534. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.10551.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

The effect of intensive blood pressure lowering on brain health remains uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of intensive blood pressure treatment with cerebral white matter lesion and brain volumes.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A substudy of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of hypertensive adults 50 years or older without a history of diabetes or stroke at 27 sites in the United States. Randomization began on November 8, 2010. The overall trial was stopped early because of benefit for its primary outcome (a composite of cardiovascular events) and all-cause mortality on August 20, 2015. Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on a subset of participants at baseline (n = 670) and at 4 years of follow-up (n = 449); final follow-up date was July 1, 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

Participants were randomized to a systolic blood pressure (SBP) goal of either less than 120 mm Hg (intensive treatment, n = 355) or less than 140 mm Hg (standard treatment, n = 315).

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was change in total white matter lesion volume from baseline. Change in total brain volume was a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Among 670 recruited patients who had baseline MRI (mean age, 67.3 [SD, 8.2] years; 40.4% women), 449 (67.0%) completed the follow-up MRI at a median of 3.97 years after randomization, after a median intervention period of 3.40 years. In the intensive treatment group, based on a robust linear mixed model, mean white matter lesion volume increased from 4.57 to 5.49 cm3 (difference, 0.92 cm3 [95% CI, 0.69 to 1.14]) vs an increase from 4.40 to 5.85 cm3 (difference, 1.45 cm3 [95% CI, 1.21 to 1.70]) in the standard treatment group (between-group difference in change, -0.54 cm3 [95% CI, -0.87 to -0.20]). Mean total brain volume decreased from 1134.5 to 1104.0 cm3 (difference, -30.6 cm3 [95% CI, -32.3 to -28.8]) in the intensive treatment group vs a decrease from 1134.0 to 1107.1 cm3 (difference, -26.9 cm3 [95% CI, 24.8 to 28.8]) in the standard treatment group (between-group difference in change, -3.7 cm3 [95% CI, -6.3 to -1.1]).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Among hypertensive adults, targeting an SBP of less than 120 mm Hg, compared with less than 140 mm Hg, was significantly associated with a smaller increase in cerebral white matter lesion volume and a greater decrease in total brain volume, although the differences were small.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01206062.

摘要

重要性

强化降压对大脑健康的影响仍不确定。

目的

评估强化血压治疗与脑白质病变和脑体积的关系。

设计、地点和参与者:在美国 27 个地点的多中心随机临床试验中,对 50 岁或以上无糖尿病或中风病史的高血压成年人进行的一项子研究。随机分组于 2010 年 11 月 8 日开始。由于其主要结局(心血管事件的综合指标)和全因死亡率的获益,整个试验于 2015 年 8 月 20 日提前停止。基线时(n=670)和 4 年随访时(n=449)对部分参与者进行了脑部磁共振成像(MRI)检查;最终随访日期为 2016 年 7 月 1 日。

干预措施

参与者被随机分配到收缩压(SBP)目标值低于 120mmHg(强化治疗组,n=355)或低于 140mmHg(标准治疗组,n=315)。

主要结局和测量指标

主要结局是从基线到总白质病变体积的变化。总脑体积的变化是次要结局。

结果

在招募的 670 名有基线 MRI 的患者中(平均年龄 67.3[标准差,8.2]岁;40.4%为女性),449 名(67.0%)在随机分组后中位数 3.97 年完成了随访 MRI,中位干预时间为 3.40 年。在强化治疗组中,基于稳健的线性混合模型,白质病变体积从 4.57cm3增加到 5.49cm3(差值为 0.92cm3[95%置信区间,0.69 至 1.14]),而标准治疗组从 4.40cm3增加到 5.85cm3(差值为 1.45cm3[95%置信区间,1.21 至 1.70])(组间差异变化,-0.54cm3[95%置信区间,-0.87 至-0.20])。强化治疗组总脑体积从 1134.5cm3减少到 1104.0cm3(差值为-30.6cm3[95%置信区间,-32.3 至-28.8]),而标准治疗组从 1134.0cm3减少到 1107.1cm3(差值为-26.9cm3[95%置信区间,24.8 至 28.8])(组间差异变化,-3.7cm3[95%置信区间,-6.3 至-1.1])。

结论和相关性

在高血压成年人中,与目标 SBP 低于 140mmHg 相比,目标 SBP 低于 120mmHg 与脑白质病变体积增加较小和总脑体积减少较大显著相关,尽管差异较小。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01206062。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
Blood Pressure Measurement in SPRINT (Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial).SPRINT 中的血压测量(收缩压干预试验)。
Hypertension. 2018 May;71(5):848-857. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.117.10479. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
8
A Randomized Trial of Intensive versus Standard Blood-Pressure Control.强化与标准血压控制的随机试验
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 26;373(22):2103-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1511939. Epub 2015 Nov 9.
9
How low can you go?你能有多低?
Ann Neurol. 2015 Nov;78(5):665-6. doi: 10.1002/ana.24530.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验