van der Willik Esmee M, Hemmelder Marc H, Bart Hans A J, van Ittersum Frans J, Hoogendijk-van den Akker Judith M, Bos Willem Jan W, Dekker Friedo W, Meuleman Yvette
Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Nefrovisie Foundation, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Clin Kidney J. 2020 Feb 3;14(6):1535-1544. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfz192. eCollection 2021 Jun.
The use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) is becoming increasingly important in healthcare. However, incorporation of PROMs into routine nephrological care is challenging. This study describes the first experience with PROMs in Dutch routine dialysis care.
A pilot study was conducted in dialysis patients in 16 centres. Patients were invited to complete PROMs at baseline and 3 and 6 months. PROMs consisted of the 12-item short-form and Dialysis Symptom Index to assess health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and symptom burden. Response rates, HRQoL and symptom burden scores were analysed. Qualitative research methods were used to gain insight into patients' views on using PROMs in clinical practice.
In total, 512 patients (36%) completed 908 PROMs (24%) across three time points. Response rates varied from 6 to 70% among centres. Mean scores for physical and mental HRQoL were 35.6 [standard deviation (SD) 10.2] and 47.7 (SD 10.6), respectively. Patients experienced on average 10.8 (SD 6.1) symptoms with a symptom burden score of 30.7 (SD 22.0). Only 1-3% of the variation in PROM scores can be explained by differences between centres. Patients perceived discussing their HRQoL and symptom scores as insightful and valuable. Individual feedback on results was considered crucial.
The first results show low average response rates with high variability among centres. Dialysis patients experienced a high symptom burden and poor HRQoL. Using PROMs at the individual patient level is suitable and may improve patient-professional communication and shared decision making. Further research is needed to investigate how the collection and the use of PROMs can be successfully integrated into routine care to improve healthcare quality and outcomes.
患者报告结局测量指标(PROMs)在医疗保健中的应用日益重要。然而,将PROMs纳入常规肾脏护理具有挑战性。本研究描述了荷兰常规透析护理中使用PROMs的首次经验。
在16个中心对透析患者进行了一项试点研究。邀请患者在基线、3个月和6个月时完成PROMs。PROMs包括12项简表和透析症状指数,以评估健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)和症状负担。分析了应答率、HRQoL和症状负担得分。采用定性研究方法,以深入了解患者对在临床实践中使用PROMs的看法。
共有512名患者(36%)在三个时间点完成了908份PROMs(24%)。各中心的应答率从6%到70%不等。身体和心理HRQoL的平均得分分别为35.6[标准差(SD)10.2]和47.7(SD 10.6)。患者平均经历10.8(SD 6.1)种症状,症状负担得分为30.7(SD 22.0)。PROM得分的差异中只有1%-3%可由中心间差异解释。患者认为讨论他们的HRQoL和症状得分具有启发性和价值。对结果的个人反馈被认为至关重要。
初步结果显示,平均应答率较低,各中心之间差异较大。透析患者症状负担高,HRQoL差。在个体患者层面使用PROMs是合适的,可能会改善医患沟通和共同决策。需要进一步研究,以探讨如何将PROMs的收集和使用成功整合到常规护理中,以提高医疗质量和结局。