患者和医护人员常规使用静脉血栓栓塞症患者报告结局测量的首次体验

First Experiences of Patients and Healthcare Professionals with Routine Use of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Venous Thromboembolism.

作者信息

de Jong Cindy M M, Ter Haar Sophie N M, Bos Willem Jan W, den Exter Paul L, Huisman Menno V, Kosterink Marlon H C, van Mens Thijs E, Klok Frederikus A

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Thrombosis and Hemostasis, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

Department of Medicine, Nephrology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

TH Open. 2025 May 23;9:a26007707. doi: 10.1055/a-2600-7707. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) can considerably limit patients' functioning and quality of life. Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), the full impact of VTE on individual patients can be captured.

METHODS

To evaluate the experiences of patients and healthcare professionals with the routine use of PROMs for VTE patients visiting the outpatient clinic, a mixed-methods study was performed at Leiden University Medical Center, the Netherlands. VTE PROMs were incorporated into routine care since March 2023, through a digital application sending patients invitations to complete PROMs. Quantitative and qualitative data were obtained from semi-structured interviews with patients and involved healthcare professionals. The NoMAD (normalization measure development) questionnaire was used to assess the implementation process from the professionals' perspective. Patients aged ≥18 years who experienced VTE and completed PROMs at two follow-up time points during ≥3 months follow-up and VTE patients who did not complete PROMs at both time points were asked to participate.

RESULTS

Eight patients (five completed PROMs; three did not) and four professionals were interviewed. Both patients and professionals experienced the use of PROMs as neutral to predominantly positive (lower limit 3 on a scale of 1-5). All professionals valued the effects of PROMs on their work. Most patients felt the questionnaires contained too many questions. Suggestions to improve the completion rate, accessibility, PROMs content, and the digital tool were shared.

CONCLUSION

PROMs were believed to provide additional value during preparation for the appointment and during the consultation. The first experiences of patients and professionals, tending toward positive, can be used to improve PROMs application and support implementation in routine thrombosis care.

摘要

背景

静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)会严重限制患者的身体机能和生活质量。通过患者报告结局指标(PROMs),可以全面了解VTE对个体患者的影响。

方法

为了评估患者和医护人员在门诊就诊的VTE患者常规使用PROMs的体验,在荷兰莱顿大学医学中心进行了一项混合方法研究。自2023年3月起,VTE PROMs通过数字应用程序纳入常规护理,该程序向患者发送完成PROMs的邀请。通过对患者和相关医护人员的半结构化访谈获得定量和定性数据。使用NoMAD(规范化测量开发)问卷从专业人员的角度评估实施过程。邀请年龄≥18岁、经历过VTE且在≥3个月的随访期间在两个随访时间点完成PROMs的患者,以及在两个时间点均未完成PROMs的VTE患者参与。

结果

采访了8名患者(5名完成了PROMs;3名未完成)和4名专业人员。患者和专业人员都认为使用PROMs的体验从中性到主要为积极(在1-5分的量表上下限为3分)。所有专业人员都重视PROMs对他们工作的影响。大多数患者觉得问卷中的问题太多。分享了提高完成率、可及性、PROMs内容和数字工具的建议。

结论

PROMs被认为在预约准备和咨询期间提供了额外价值。患者和专业人员的初步体验趋于积极,可用于改进PROMs的应用并支持其在常规血栓护理中的实施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0fb7/12132087/b5e8ddd6e5bc/10-1055-a-2600-7707-i24110030-1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索