Meershoek Philippa, van den Berg Nynke S, Lutjeboer Jacob, Burgmans Mark C, van der Meer Rutger W, van Rijswijk Catharina S P, van Oosterom Matthias N, van Erkel Arian R, van Leeuwen Fijs W B
Interventional Radiology Section, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Interventional Molecular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2300 RC, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Eur J Radiol Open. 2021 Jul 8;8:100367. doi: 10.1016/j.ejro.2021.100367. eCollection 2021.
The goal of our study was to determine the influence of ultrasound (US)-coupled volume navigation on the use of computed tomography (CT) during minimally-invasive radiofrequency and microwave ablation procedures of liver lesions.
Twenty-five patients with 40 liver lesions of different histological origin were retrospectively analysed. Lesions were ablated following standard protocol, using 1) conventional US-guidance, 2) manual registered volume navigation (VNav), 3) automatic registered (VNav) or 4) CT-guidance. In case of ultrasonographically inconspicuous lesions, conventional US-guidance was abandoned and VNav was used. If VNav was also unsuccessful, the procedure was either continued with VNav or CT-guidance. The number, size and location of the lesions targeted using the different approaches were documented.
Of the 40 lesions, sixteen (40.0 %) could be targeted with conventional US-guidance only, sixteen (40.0 %) with VNav, three (7.5 %) with VNav and five (12.5 %) only through the use of CT-guidance. Of the three alternatives (VNav, VNav and CT only) the mean size of the lesions targeted using VNav (9.1 ± 4.6 mm) was significantly smaller from those targeted using US-guidance only (20.4 ± 9.4 mm; p < 0.001). The location of the lesions did not influence the selection of the modality used to guide the ablation.
In our cohort, VNav allowed the ablation procedure to become less dependent on the use of CT. VNav supported the ablation of lesions smaller than those that could be ablated with US only and doubled the application of minimally-invasive US-guided ablations.
本研究的目的是确定在肝脏病变的微创射频和微波消融手术中,超声(US)耦合容积导航对计算机断层扫描(CT)使用的影响。
回顾性分析了25例患有40个不同组织学来源肝脏病变的患者。按照标准方案对病变进行消融,使用1)传统超声引导,2)手动注册容积导航(VNav),3)自动注册(VNav)或4)CT引导。对于超声检查不明显的病变,放弃传统超声引导并使用VNav。如果VNav也不成功,则继续使用VNav或CT引导进行手术。记录使用不同方法靶向的病变的数量、大小和位置。
在40个病变中,16个(40.0%)仅可通过传统超声引导靶向,16个(40.0%)通过VNav靶向,3个(7.5%)通过VNav靶向,5个(12.5%)仅通过使用CT引导靶向。在三种替代方法(仅VNav、VNav和仅CT)中,使用VNav靶向的病变的平均大小(9.1±4.6mm)明显小于仅使用超声引导靶向的病变(20.4±9.4mm;p<0.001)。病变的位置不影响用于引导消融的方式的选择。
在我们的队列中,VNav使消融手术对CT的使用依赖性降低。VNav支持对小于仅用超声可消融的病变进行消融,并使微创超声引导消融的应用增加了一倍。