• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Supporting the vital role of boundary-spanning physician researchers in the advancement of medical innovation.支持跨领域医生研究人员在医学创新进步中发挥至关重要的作用。
Future Healthc J. 2021 Jul;8(2):e210-e217. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0091.
2
Physician leaders' cross-boundary use of social media: what are the implications in the current COVID-19 environment?医生领导者对社交媒体的跨界使用:在当前新冠疫情环境下有哪些影响?
Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2021 Jul 28;ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print). doi: 10.1108/LHS-06-2020-0040.
3
A rapid realist review of patient engagement in patient-oriented research and health care system impacts: part one.以患者为导向的研究中患者参与及医疗保健系统影响的快速实证综述:第一部分。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Oct 10;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00299-6.
4
"Still learning and evolving in our approaches": patient and stakeholder engagement among Canadian community-based primary health care researchers.“仍在学习并不断改进我们的方法”:加拿大社区基层医疗保健研究人员中的患者及利益相关者参与情况
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 3;4:47. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0132-0. eCollection 2018.
5
American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.美国临床肿瘤学会政策声明:临床研究监督
J Clin Oncol. 2003 Jun 15;21(12):2377-86. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2003.04.026. Epub 2003 Apr 29.
6
How to engage stakeholders in research: design principles to support improvement.如何让利益相关者参与研究:支持改进的设计原则。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2018 Jul 11;16(1):60. doi: 10.1186/s12961-018-0337-6.
7
Initiating a network to support engagement between health researchers and schools: recommendations from an international meeting of schools engagement practitioners held in Kilifi, Kenya.发起一个支持健康研究人员与学校互动的网络:来自于在肯尼亚基利菲举行的学校互动从业者国际会议的建议。
Wellcome Open Res. 2020 Jul 7;4:180. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15556.2. eCollection 2019.
8
The emotional labour of boundary spanning.跨越边界的情感劳动。
J Integr Care (Brighton). 2017;25(4):288-300. doi: 10.1108/JICA-04-2017-0008.
9
Building a sustainable rural physician workforce.建设可持续的农村医师队伍。
Med J Aust. 2021 Jul;215 Suppl 1:S5-S33. doi: 10.5694/mja2.51122.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Empowering biomedical learners to navigate FDA regulatory processes and entrepreneurship with a novel interdisciplinary training approach.通过一种新颖的跨学科培训方法,使生物医学学习者能够应对美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的监管流程并开展创业活动。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Feb 6;12:1522572. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1522572. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Key opinion leaders - a critical perspective.关键意见领袖——批判性视角。
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2021 Feb;17(2):119-124. doi: 10.1038/s41584-020-00539-1. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
2
Therapeutic blockade of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor in COVID-19-associated hyperinflammation: challenges and opportunities.治疗性阻断 COVID-19 相关过度炎症反应中的粒细胞巨噬细胞集落刺激因子:挑战与机遇。
Lancet Respir Med. 2020 Aug;8(8):822-830. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30267-8. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Citizens of somewhere: Examining the geography of foreign and native-born academics' engagement with external actors.某地的公民:审视外国出生和本地出生学者与外部行为者互动的地域情况。
Res Policy. 2019 Apr;48(3):759-774. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2018.11.008.
4
Compliance with requirement to report results on the EU Clinical Trials Register: cohort study and web resource.遵守在欧盟临床试验注册库中报告结果的要求:队列研究与网络资源
BMJ. 2018 Sep 12;362:k3218. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k3218.
5
Conflict of interest disclosure in biomedical research: A review of current practices, biases, and the role of public registries in improving transparency.生物医学研究中的利益冲突披露:当前实践、偏见以及公共注册机构在提高透明度方面的作用综述
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2016;1. doi: 10.1186/s41073-016-0006-7. Epub 2016 May 3.
6
Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: a three-stage review.临床医生和组织参与研究是否能提高医疗保健绩效:三阶段综述
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 9;5(12):e009415. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009415.
7
New physician-investigators receiving National Institutes of Health research project grants: a historical perspective on the "endangered species".获得美国国立卫生研究院研究项目资助的新医生-研究人员:对“濒危物种”的历史视角
JAMA. 2007 Jun 13;297(22):2496-501. doi: 10.1001/jama.297.22.2496.
8
Conflicts of interest in biomedical research.生物医学研究中的利益冲突。
JAMA. 2000 Nov 1;284(17):2234-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.17.2234.
9
The clinical investigator: bewitched, bothered, and bewildered--but still beloved.临床研究者:被蛊惑、被困扰、被迷惑——但依然受人爱戴。
J Clin Invest. 1997 Jun 15;99(12):2803-12. doi: 10.1172/JCI119470.

支持跨领域医生研究人员在医学创新进步中发挥至关重要的作用。

Supporting the vital role of boundary-spanning physician researchers in the advancement of medical innovation.

作者信息

Hopkins Michael M, Ibanez Fabien, Skingle Malcolm

机构信息

University of Sussex Business School, Brighton, UK.

GlaxoSmithKline, institution city, institution country.

出版信息

Future Healthc J. 2021 Jul;8(2):e210-e217. doi: 10.7861/fhj.2021-0091.

DOI:10.7861/fhj.2021-0091
PMID:34286187
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8285151/
Abstract

A wide range of stakeholders recognise that physicians play a vital role in medical innovation and, in particular, the importance of boundary-spanning engagement between physicians and industry in clinical research. While UK physicians are keen to take part in research, this article draws on a range of literature to identify apparent and anticipated challenges that discourage or prevent cross-sector engagement by physician researchers. To encourage greater interaction and exploration of associated support mechanisms, we present a full spectrum of engagement modes, funding opportunities and illustrative initiatives, showing how different stakeholders (from government institutions, charities, professional bodies and industry) can contribute to improving the engagement of physicians in boundary spanning research. We emphasise the importance of mutual understanding, trust and commonly shared practices, as well as adequate resources, to encourage these vital interactions.

摘要

众多利益相关者认识到医生在医学创新中发挥着至关重要的作用,尤其是医生与行业在临床研究中的跨界合作的重要性。虽然英国医生热衷于参与研究,但本文借鉴了一系列文献,以识别阻碍或阻止医生研究人员进行跨部门合作的明显和预期挑战。为了鼓励更多的互动和探索相关支持机制,我们展示了全方位的合作模式、资金机会和示例举措,展示了不同利益相关者(来自政府机构、慈善机构、专业团体和行业)如何为提高医生参与跨界研究做出贡献。我们强调相互理解、信任和共同的实践以及充足资源对于鼓励这些重要互动的重要性。