Boaz Annette, Hanney Stephen, Jones Teresa, Soper Bryony
Faculty of Health, Social Care and Education, St George's, University of London and Kingston University, Grosvenor Wing, Cranmer Terrace, London, UK.
Health Economics Research Group, Brunel University London, London, UK.
BMJ Open. 2015 Dec 9;5(12):e009415. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009415.
There is a widely held assumption that engagement by clinicians and healthcare organisations in research improves healthcare performance at various levels, but little direct empirical evidence has previously been collated. The objective of this study was to address the question: Does research engagement (by clinicians and organisations) improve healthcare performance?
An hourglass-shaped review was developed, consisting of three stages: (1) a planning and mapping stage; (2) a focused review concentrating on the core question of whether or not research engagement improves healthcare performance; and (3) a wider (but less systematic) review of papers identified during the two earlier stages, focusing on mechanisms.
Of the 33 papers included in the focused review, 28 identified improvements in health services performance. Seven out of these papers reported some improvement in health outcomes, with others reporting improved processes of care. The wider review demonstrated that mechanisms such as collaborative and action research can encourage some progress along the pathway from research engagement towards improved healthcare performance. Organisations that have deliberately integrated the research function into organisational structures demonstrate how research engagement can, among other factors, contribute to improved healthcare performance.
Current evidence suggests that there is an association between the engagement of individuals and healthcare organisations in research and improvements in healthcare performance. The mechanisms through which research engagement might improve healthcare performance overlap and rarely act in isolation, and their effectiveness often depends on the context in which they operate.
人们普遍认为临床医生和医疗机构参与研究能在不同层面提高医疗保健绩效,但此前几乎没有整理过直接的实证证据。本研究的目的是解决以下问题:(临床医生和医疗机构的)研究参与是否能提高医疗保健绩效?
开展了一项沙漏形综述,包括三个阶段:(1)规划与映射阶段;(2)聚焦综述,重点关注研究参与是否能提高医疗保健绩效这一核心问题;(3)对在前两个阶段确定的论文进行更广泛(但系统性稍弱)的综述,重点关注作用机制。
在聚焦综述纳入的33篇论文中,28篇指出卫生服务绩效有所改善。其中7篇论文报告健康结局有一定改善,其他论文报告护理流程有所改善。更广泛的综述表明,协作研究和行动研究等机制可推动从研究参与到提高医疗保健绩效的过程取得一些进展。有意将研究职能融入组织结构的机构展示了研究参与如何在其他因素的共同作用下有助于提高医疗保健绩效。
现有证据表明,个人和医疗机构参与研究与医疗保健绩效的改善之间存在关联。研究参与可能提高医疗保健绩效的机制相互重叠,很少单独发挥作用,其有效性往往取决于其运作的背景。