Suppr超能文献

检验人格障碍替代模型 A 标准的自陈量表的结构和有效性。

Examining the Structure and Validity of Self-Report Measures of Alternative Model for Personality Disorders Criterion A.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania.

Department of Psychology, West Chester University, West Chester, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Pers Disord. 2022 Apr;36(2):157-182. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2021_35_531. Epub 2021 Jul 21.

Abstract

The Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS) operationalizes Criterion A of the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders. Despite progress in LPFS measurement development and validation, there is a lack of research, and some disagreement, concerning structural, convergent, and incremental validity of LPFS self-report measures. The present study aimed to compare the LPFS Self-Report, LPFS Self-Report of Criterion A, and LPFS Brief Form. Internal structure was assessed through principal component analyses, factor analyses, and bifactor analyses of unidimensionality. Associations with both pathological and basic personality characteristics among the LPFS measures were explored. Incremental validity of LPFS severity in predicting pathological personality outcomes controlling for basic personality traits, and the reverse, were examined. Results suggest a unidimensional structure robustly associated with other pathological personality assessments. LPFS severity and basic personality traits mutually offered unique explanatory power. We discuss the implications of assessing personality pathology using LPFS self-report measures.

摘要

人格功能量表 (LPFS) 将人格障碍替代模型的标准 A 操作化。尽管在 LPFS 测量开发和验证方面取得了进展,但关于 LPFS 自评量表的结构、收敛和增量效度的研究和一些分歧仍然存在。本研究旨在比较 LPFS 自评量表、LPFS 自评量表的标准 A 和 LPFS 简明量表。通过主成分分析、因子分析和单维性的双因素分析来评估内部结构。探讨了 LPFS 测量与病理性和基本人格特征之间的关联。检验了在控制基本人格特质的情况下,LPFS 严重程度对病理性人格结果的预测的增量效度,以及相反的情况。结果表明,一种与其他病理性人格评估高度相关的单一结构。LPFS 严重程度和基本人格特质相互提供了独特的解释力。我们讨论了使用 LPFS 自评量表评估人格病理学的意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验