a Department of Psychology , University of California , Davis.
b Department of Psychology , Michigan State University.
J Pers Assess. 2018 Nov-Dec;100(6):650-659. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1420660. Epub 2018 Feb 9.
In this study we examined the structure, reliability, and validity of the Levels of Personality Functioning Scale-Self Report (LPFS-SR) in 3 large community samples. The LPFS-SR is a questionnaire with content that corresponds directly to the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders, Criterion A. We found that the LPFS-SR was highly reliable across a brief retest interval. LPFS-SR scores correlated substantially with a wide range of maladaptive personality traits, personality disorder constructs, and interpersonal problems. The LPFS-SR did not correlate as strongly with aspects of personality with less clear relations to distress and dysfunction. Data further support that identity, self-direction, intimacy, and empathy components of the LPFS-SR can be characterized by a single factor and have similar correlations with criterion variables, consistent with the hypothesis that DSM-5 Criterion A is a relatively homogeneous construct. Overall, these results support the validity of the LPFS-SR, highlight important issues in assessing personality pathology, and point toward novel avenues for research on personality disorder classification.
在这项研究中,我们在 3 个大型社区样本中考察了人格功能水平量表-自我报告(LPFS-SR)的结构、信度和效度。LPFS-SR 是一份与 DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型(A 标准)直接对应的问卷。我们发现,LPFS-SR 在短暂的重测间隔内具有很高的信度。LPFS-SR 得分与广泛的适应不良人格特质、人格障碍结构和人际关系问题密切相关。LPFS-SR 与那些与痛苦和功能障碍关系不太明确的人格方面的相关性不强。数据进一步支持 LPFS-SR 的身份、自我导向、亲密关系和同理心成分可以用一个单一的因素来描述,并且与标准变量具有相似的相关性,这与 DSM-5 A 标准是一个相对同质的结构的假设一致。总体而言,这些结果支持 LPFS-SR 的有效性,突出了评估人格病理学的重要问题,并为人格障碍分类的研究开辟了新的途径。