a Department of Psychology , Penn State Altoona.
b Department of Psychology , The Pennsylvania State University.
J Pers Assess. 2018 Nov-Dec;100(6):571-580. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2018.1475394. Epub 2018 Jun 13.
The Level of Personality Functioning Scale (LPFS) operationalizes Criterion A of the DSM-5 alternative model for personality disorders. Yet, research on this measure has been slow to accumulate and questions remain regarding its reliability and validity. This study examined the LPFS observer-rated (OR) and self-report (SRA) versions of Criterion A in a sample of 240 students who provided psychological life history data and a variety of self-report measures. The results suggested the LPFS OR could be reliably coded, and the LPFS OR and LPFS SRA were significantly associated with outcome variables across psychodynamic and interpersonal paradigms. We discuss the implications of assessing personality dysfunction using the LPFS and the importance of expanding the research base for the AMPD model.
人格功能水平量表(LPFS)将 DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型的标准 A 操作化。然而,针对该测量工具的研究进展缓慢,其可靠性和有效性仍存在疑问。本研究在 240 名学生样本中检验了人格障碍诊断与统计手册第五版替代模型人格障碍标准 A 的 LPFS 观察评定(OR)和自我报告(SRA)版本,这些学生提供了心理生活史数据和各种自我报告的测量工具。结果表明,LPFS OR 可以进行可靠编码,LPFS OR 和 LPFS SRA 与心理动力学和人际范式的结果变量显著相关。我们讨论了使用 LPFS 评估人格功能障碍的意义,以及扩展 AMPD 模型研究基础的重要性。