Key Laboratory of Oral Medicine, Guangzhou Institute of Oral Disease, Stomatology Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Motherhood and Childhood Hospital, Ministry of Health, Ibb, Yemen.
Head Neck. 2021 Nov;43(11):3631-3645. doi: 10.1002/hed.26813. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
The impact of the extent of parotid surgery on postoperative complications has long been considered a topic of controversy. The aim of the current network meta-analysis (NMA) is to answer the following questions: (1) Does the extent of surgical resection of benign parotid tumors increase the risk of postoperative complications? (2) What is the best surgical intervention for treatment of benign parotid tumors that can provide an acceptable balance between tumor recurrence rate and other postoperative complications? A comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane library was conducted to identify the eligible studies. The outcome was the incidence of tumor recurrence, facial nerve weakness (temporary [TFW] or permanent [PFP]), Frey's syndrome (FS), sialocele, and salivary fistula. The Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) accompanied by a random effect model and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were calculated using the GeMTC R package. Forty-four studies with a total of 7841 participants were included in the current NMA comparing five surgical interventions, namely enucleation, extracapsular dissection (ECD), partial superficial parotidectomy (PSP), superficial parotidectomy (SP), and total parotidectomy (TP). Enucleation showed the highest recurrence rate compared to ECD, SPS, SP, and TP. No statistical differences were observed concerning the recurrence rate when ECD, PSP, SP, and TP were compared together. There was an increased incidence of TFW and FS with the increase in the extent of parotid resection, while no significant difference was found when comparing enucleation with ECD and PSP. SP showed the highest incidence of PFP, and salivary fistula compared to ECD, PSP, and TP. The tumor recurrence rates in enucleation, ECD, PSP, SP, and TP were 14.3%, 3.6%, 3.7%, 2.8%, and 1.4%, respectively. The current NMA demonstrated that the risk of TFW and FS increases with the increase in the extent of parotid resection and that ECD and PSP can be considered the treatment of choice for benign parotid tumors, as both provide an acceptable balance between the incidence of tumor recurrence and facial nerve dysfunction.
腮腺手术范围对术后并发症的影响一直是一个有争议的话题。本网络荟萃分析(NMA)旨在回答以下问题:(1)腮腺良性肿瘤的手术切除范围是否会增加术后并发症的风险?(2)对于治疗腮腺良性肿瘤,哪种手术干预方法最好,可以在肿瘤复发率和其他术后并发症之间取得可接受的平衡?我们对 PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane 图书馆进行了全面检索,以确定符合条件的研究。结果为肿瘤复发、面神经无力(暂时性[TFW]或永久性[PFP])、弗雷综合征(FS)、涎瘘和涎肿的发生率。使用 GeMTC R 包进行贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA),并伴有随机效应模型和 95%可信区间(CrI)。目前的 NMA 纳入了 44 项研究,共 7841 名参与者,比较了五种手术干预措施,即剜除术、囊外解剖术(ECD)、部分腮腺浅叶切除术(PSP)、腮腺浅叶切除术(SP)和腮腺全切除术(TP)。与 ECD、PSP、SP 和 TP 相比,剜除术显示出最高的复发率。ECD、PSP、SP 和 TP 之间比较时,复发率无统计学差异。随着腮腺切除范围的增加,TFW 和 FS 的发生率增加,而 ECD 和 PSP 之间比较时无显著差异。SP 与 ECD、PSP 和 TP 相比,PFP 和涎瘘的发生率最高。剜除术、ECD、PSP、SP 和 TP 的肿瘤复发率分别为 14.3%、3.6%、3.7%、2.8%和 1.4%。目前的 NMA 表明,TFW 和 FS 的风险随着腮腺切除范围的增加而增加,ECD 和 PSP 可作为腮腺良性肿瘤的治疗选择,因为两者在肿瘤复发率和面神经功能障碍发生率之间取得了可接受的平衡。