Suppr超能文献

射频消融治疗腮腺浅叶多形性腺瘤的安全性和有效性

Safety and Efficacy of Radiofrequency Ablation for Superficial Parotid Pleomorphic Adenoma.

作者信息

Lee Chih-Ying, Lin Wei-Che, Luo Sheng-Dean, Chiang Pi-Ling, Lin An-Ni, Wang Cheng-Kang, Chao Chun-Yuan

机构信息

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Kaohsiung Municipal Feng Shan Shen Hospital-Under the Management of Chang Gung Medical Foundation, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Korean J Radiol. 2025 May;26(5):460-470. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0909.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To retrospectively compare the safety and efficacy of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with parotidectomy for superficial pleomorphic adenoma (PA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2022 to October 2023, 88 patients diagnosed with superficial parotid PA underwent either RFA (n = 12; mean age, 47.1 years) or parotidectomy (n = 76; mean age, 47.8 years). Patients in the RFA group were matched to those in the surgery group in a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores based on age, sex, tumor volume, diameter, location, and comorbidities. Ultrasound characteristics, cosmetic scores (0-4), numerical rating scale scores (0-10), and complications were assessed before the procedures and at 1-, 3-, and 6-month follow-ups. Outcomes were compared between baseline and follow-up in the RFA group and between the RFA and surgery groups.

RESULTS

In the RFA group, significant reductions in tumor volume were observed between baseline (median, 2.02 cm³) and the 1-month follow-up (median, 1.21 cm³; = 0.015), between the 1-month and 3-month follow-ups (median, 0.53 cm³; = 0.002), and between the 3- and 6-month follow-ups (median, 0.23 cm³; = 0.003). The volume reduction ratios at 1, 3, and 6 months were 39.7%, 79.9%, and 88.0%, respectively. The cosmetic score was significantly lower at 3- and 6-month follow-up compared to baseline (median 1 and 1 vs. 4, = 0.04). The numerical rating scale scores did not differ significantly from baseline throughout follow-up. In the propensity score-matched analysis (12 patients per group), RFA was associated with a shorter median procedure time (61.5 vs. 253.3 minutes; < 0.001), shorter hospital stay (0 vs. 4 days; < 0.001), and lower cost (1859.9 vs. 3512.4 USD; < 0.001) than parotidectomy, with no significant difference in overall complication rates (33.3% [4/12] vs. 41.7% [5/12]; = 1.000).

CONCLUSION

RFA may be a safe and effective alternative to surgery for superficial parotid PA, offering a shorter median procedure time, shorter hospital stay, and lower costs.

摘要

目的

回顾性比较超声引导下射频消融术(RFA)与腮腺切除术治疗浅表多形性腺瘤(PA)的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

2022年3月至2023年10月,88例被诊断为腮腺浅表PA的患者接受了RFA(n = 12;平均年龄47.1岁)或腮腺切除术(n = 76;平均年龄47.8岁)。根据年龄、性别、肿瘤体积、直径、位置和合并症,使用倾向得分将RFA组患者与手术组患者按1:1的比例进行匹配。在手术前以及术后1、3和6个月的随访中评估超声特征、美容评分(0 - 4分)、数字评分量表评分(0 - 10分)和并发症。比较RFA组基线与随访情况以及RFA组与手术组之间的结果。

结果

在RFA组中,观察到肿瘤体积在基线(中位数,2.02 cm³)与1个月随访之间(中位数,1.21 cm³;P = 0.015)、1个月与3个月随访之间(中位数,0.53 cm³;P = 0.002)以及3个月与6个月随访之间(中位数,0.23 cm³;P = 0.003)均有显著减小。1、3和6个月时的体积缩小率分别为39.7%、79.9%和88.0%。与基线相比,3个月和6个月随访时的美容评分显著更低(中位数分别为1和1,而基线时为4;P = 0.04)。在整个随访过程中,数字评分量表评分与基线相比无显著差异。在倾向得分匹配分析中(每组12例患者),与腮腺切除术相比,RFA的中位手术时间更短(61.5对253.3分钟;P < 0.001),住院时间更短(0对4天;P < 0.001),成本更低(1859.9对3512.4美元;P < 0.001),总体并发症发生率无显著差异(33.3% [4/12]对41.7% [5/12];P = 1.000)。

结论

对于腮腺浅表PA,RFA可能是一种安全有效的手术替代方法,具有更短的中位手术时间、更短的住院时间和更低的成本。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1485/12055268/32d520493cd2/kjr-26-460-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验