Suppr超能文献

免疫斑点印迹技术诊断沙眼衣原体感染

Immune dot blot technique for diagnosing infection with Chlamydia trachomatis.

作者信息

Storey C C, Mearns G, Richmond S J

机构信息

North Manchester Regional Virus Laboratory, Booth Hall Children's Hospital.

出版信息

Genitourin Med. 1987 Dec;63(6):375-9. doi: 10.1136/sti.63.6.375.

Abstract

An immune dot blot test (IDBT) to detect the genus specific lipopolysaccharide chlamydial antigen is described, in which the antigen is trapped on nitrocellulose membrane and then detected with a monoclonal antibody labelled with 125iodine. A preliminary comparison of 270 specimens obtained from the endocervix or male urethra showed that the IDBT was more sensitive (sensitivity 90%) than a commercial amplified enzyme immunoassay named IDEIA (sensitivity (60%) for detecting specimens that yielded Chlamydia trachomatis on culture. Subsequent assessment of 950 urogenital tract specimens in the IDBT and by culture confirmed the sensitivity (92%) and specificity (95%) of the IDBT. At least one of 56 specimens obtained from the eye, however, gave a false positive result, which was probably due to staphylococcal protein A in the specimen. The IDBT provides the basis for a novel simple test for detecting the genus Chlamydia.

摘要

本文描述了一种用于检测衣原体属特异性脂多糖抗原的免疫斑点印迹试验(IDBT),该试验中抗原被捕获在硝酸纤维素膜上,然后用标记有125碘的单克隆抗体进行检测。对从子宫颈或男性尿道获取的270份标本进行的初步比较显示,在检测培养中产生沙眼衣原体的标本时,IDBT比一种名为IDEIA的商业扩增酶免疫测定法更敏感(敏感性为90%),后者的敏感性为60%。随后对950份泌尿生殖道标本进行IDBT检测并与培养结果对比,证实了IDBT的敏感性(92%)和特异性(95%)。然而,从眼睛获取的56份标本中至少有一份出现假阳性结果,这可能是由于标本中存在葡萄球菌蛋白A。IDBT为检测衣原体属提供了一种新型简单检测方法的基础。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0f4e/1194119/edb00de01af3/genitmed00066-0023-a.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验