Centre for Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Faculty of Medicine and Health, Westmead Clinical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;88(2):669-679. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14995. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
The purpose of the study was to assess the status of emerging therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of anti-infective agents in Australian hospitals.
A nationwide cross-sectional survey of all Australian hospitals operating in the public and private health sector was conducted between August and September 2019. The survey consisted of questions regarding institutional TDM practice for anti-infective agents and clinical vignettes specific to β-lactam antibiotics.
Responses were received from 82 unique institutions, representing all Australian states and territories. All 29 (100%) of principal referral (major) hospitals in Australia participated. Five surveys were partially complete. Only 25% (20/80) of hospitals had TDM testing available on-site for any of the eight emerging TDM candidates considered: β-lactam antibiotics, anti-tuberculous agents, flucytosine, fluoroquinolones, ganciclovir, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) drugs, linezolid and teicoplanin. A considerable time lag was noted between TDM sampling and reporting of results. With respect to β-lactam antibiotic TDM, variable indications, pharmacodynamic targets and sampling times were identified. The three greatest barriers to local TDM performance were found to be (1) lack of timely assays/results, (2) lack of institutional-wide expertise and/or training and (3) lack of guidelines to inform ordering of TDM and interpretation of results. The majority of respondents favoured establishing national TDM guidelines and increasing access to dose prediction software, at rates of 89% and 96%, respectively.
Translating emerging TDM evidence into daily clinical practice is slow. Concerted efforts are required to address the barriers identified and facilitate the implementation of standardised practice.
本研究旨在评估澳大利亚医院中新兴治疗药物监测(TDM)在抗感染药物中的应用现状。
2019 年 8 月至 9 月期间,对澳大利亚公立和私立医疗系统中的所有医院进行了一项全国性的横断面调查。该调查包括有关机构对抗感染药物的 TDM 实践和β-内酰胺类抗生素具体临床病例的问题。
收到了来自 82 个独特机构的回复,代表了澳大利亚所有的州和地区。澳大利亚所有 29 家(100%)主要转诊(大型)医院都参与了调查。有 5 份调查部分完成。仅有 25%(20/80)的医院可在现场进行 8 种新兴 TDM 候选药物(β-内酰胺类抗生素、抗结核药物、氟胞嘧啶、氟喹诺酮类药物、更昔洛韦、人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)药物、利奈唑胺和替考拉宁)的 TDM 检测。从 TDM 采样到报告结果之间存在相当长的时间延迟。在β-内酰胺类抗生素 TDM 方面,确定了不同的适应症、药效学目标和采样时间。阻碍当地 TDM 实施的三大障碍分别是:(1)缺乏及时的检测/结果,(2)缺乏全机构范围内的专业知识和/或培训,以及(3)缺乏指导以确定 TDM 的订购和解释结果。大多数受访者赞成制定国家 TDM 指南和增加获取剂量预测软件的机会,支持率分别为 89%和 96%。
将新兴 TDM 证据转化为日常临床实践的速度较慢。需要共同努力解决所确定的障碍,促进标准化实践的实施。